Comparing Holmium (Ho): YAG Laser with Pneumatic Lithoclast for Treatment Efficacy of Ureteric Stones

S. Khalid, W. Memon, A. Haider, Adnan Siddiq Awan, Muhammad Bilal Quddus
{"title":"Comparing Holmium (Ho): YAG Laser with Pneumatic Lithoclast for Treatment Efficacy of Ureteric Stones","authors":"S. Khalid, W. Memon, A. Haider, Adnan Siddiq Awan, Muhammad Bilal Quddus","doi":"10.36283/pjmd11-1/002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\nBackground: Holmium YAG (yttrium-aluminum-garnet) laser, a comparatively new technique, can clear all types and sizes of stones and is only being used in two institutes of Karachi, Pakistan. The study aimed to compare pneumatic lithoclast and holmium YAG laser, to evaluate stone-free rate (SFR), postoperative complications, operative duration, and effectiveness.\n\nMethods: This cross-sectional research included 60 patients with age 16-65 years having ureteric stones, reporting to kidney center, Urology Department, Karachi, Pakistan. CT Scan of Kidneys, Ureter, and Bladder (KUB) were used to record stone size, laterality, and location within the ureter. Patients were divided into two clusters of 30 each, group A (Ho: YAG laser) and group B (pneumatic Lithoclast) having 0.5 to 02 cm of size ureteric stones. An Independent two-sample “t” test was used to assess the difference for the continuous variables. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n\nResults: Stone sizes distribution was 1.3±0.3cms and 1.4±0.3cms for A and B groups respectively (p=0.8). The insignificance of the p-value demonstrated no substantial divergence between both groups and stone sizes. Clearance from the proximal ureter was noted 26(84.6%) in group A and 41.7% in group B with (p<0.05). A reduced lithotripsy activation period of 30.8±3.7mins was associated with stone size (p<0.05).\n\nConclusion: Holmium: YAG Laser had better stone-free rate (SFR), with 84% clearance than pneumatic. Improved and effective clearance reduces the risk of residual stones within a lesser time, required for getting back to normal life routines.\nKeywords: Lasers; Ureteric Stones; Ho: YAG Laser; Pneumatic Lithoclast; Kidney Stones.","PeriodicalId":231166,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36283/pjmd11-1/002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Holmium YAG (yttrium-aluminum-garnet) laser, a comparatively new technique, can clear all types and sizes of stones and is only being used in two institutes of Karachi, Pakistan. The study aimed to compare pneumatic lithoclast and holmium YAG laser, to evaluate stone-free rate (SFR), postoperative complications, operative duration, and effectiveness. Methods: This cross-sectional research included 60 patients with age 16-65 years having ureteric stones, reporting to kidney center, Urology Department, Karachi, Pakistan. CT Scan of Kidneys, Ureter, and Bladder (KUB) were used to record stone size, laterality, and location within the ureter. Patients were divided into two clusters of 30 each, group A (Ho: YAG laser) and group B (pneumatic Lithoclast) having 0.5 to 02 cm of size ureteric stones. An Independent two-sample “t” test was used to assess the difference for the continuous variables. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Stone sizes distribution was 1.3±0.3cms and 1.4±0.3cms for A and B groups respectively (p=0.8). The insignificance of the p-value demonstrated no substantial divergence between both groups and stone sizes. Clearance from the proximal ureter was noted 26(84.6%) in group A and 41.7% in group B with (p<0.05). A reduced lithotripsy activation period of 30.8±3.7mins was associated with stone size (p<0.05). Conclusion: Holmium: YAG Laser had better stone-free rate (SFR), with 84% clearance than pneumatic. Improved and effective clearance reduces the risk of residual stones within a lesser time, required for getting back to normal life routines. Keywords: Lasers; Ureteric Stones; Ho: YAG Laser; Pneumatic Lithoclast; Kidney Stones.
钬激光与气动碎石治疗输尿管结石疗效比较
摘要背景:钇铝石榴石钬激光是一种较新的技术,可以清除各种类型和大小的石头,目前仅在巴基斯坦卡拉奇的两个研究所使用。该研究旨在比较气动碎石和钬激光,评估结石去除率(SFR)、术后并发症、手术时间和疗效。方法:本横断面研究纳入60例16-65岁输尿管结石患者,报告于巴基斯坦卡拉奇泌尿外科肾中心。CT扫描肾脏、输尿管和膀胱(KUB)记录结石的大小、侧边和输尿管内的位置。患者分为两组,每组30例,A组(Ho: YAG激光)和B组(气动碎石)均为0.5 ~ 02 cm输尿管结石。采用独立的两样本“t”检验来评估连续变量的差异。p值≤0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:A、B组结石大小分布分别为1.3±0.3cm、1.4±0.3cm (p=0.8)。p值的不显著性表明两组和结石大小之间没有实质性差异。A组输尿管近端清除率为26(84.6%),B组为41.7% (p<0.05)。碎石激活时间缩短30.8±3.7min与结石大小相关(p<0.05)。结论:钬激光激光除石率(SFR)优于气动,清除率达84%。改善和有效的清除减少了残留结石的风险在较短的时间内,需要恢复正常的生活习惯。关键词:激光;输尿管的结石;Ho: YAG激光器;气动岩屑;肾结石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信