Intermediary of Criminal Police Subsidiaries and Advanced Examination Agencies at the Time of Documentation of Criminal Legal Execution

A. Sakovskyi, A. Zhyzhyn
{"title":"Intermediary of Criminal Police Subsidiaries and Advanced Examination Agencies at the Time of Documentation of Criminal Legal Execution","authors":"A. Sakovskyi, A. Zhyzhyn","doi":"10.33270/01191112.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose. Definition of the notion and essence of interaction of criminal police units with pre-trial investigation agencies during documenting criminal offenses, as well as the definition of certain problem issues related to its implementation. Methodology. During writing, scientific methods of analysis, induction and deduction were used. The theoretical basis for the writing of the article was the work of domestic and foreign scholars devoted to problematic issues of the activities of pre-trial investigation agencies and criminal police units, as well as regulatory acts regulating their interaction. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the publication is a systematic analysis of the essence of the interaction of criminal police units with pre-trial investigation agencies during the documenting of criminal offenses. The reasons for the implementation of the interaction, its principles, and the concept of actual data as the main constituent of interaction within the framework of information exchange are presented. It has been established that documenting carries a lot of semantic loads, which are combined in concerted activity aimed at achieving the goal, accomplishing tasks or achieving the result. Conclusions. Documenting as an independent element of evidence is ineffective. In order to bring the perpetrator to criminal responsibility, the results of documentation should be «legalized» in the criminal procedural law by conducting investigative (search) actions. In order to effectively ensure the implementation of justice, it is necessary to apply in the complex the operational-search and criminal-procedural, as well as other branches of law, which is conditioned and realized in the interaction of their subjects. On the basis of the analysis, the actual determination of the interaction of the criminal police units with the pre-trial investigation agencies during the documenting of criminal offenses is proposed.Keywords: interaction; subject; criminal police; secret investigative (search) actions; actual data; documentation.","PeriodicalId":111799,"journal":{"name":"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","volume":"162 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33270/01191112.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose. Definition of the notion and essence of interaction of criminal police units with pre-trial investigation agencies during documenting criminal offenses, as well as the definition of certain problem issues related to its implementation. Methodology. During writing, scientific methods of analysis, induction and deduction were used. The theoretical basis for the writing of the article was the work of domestic and foreign scholars devoted to problematic issues of the activities of pre-trial investigation agencies and criminal police units, as well as regulatory acts regulating their interaction. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the publication is a systematic analysis of the essence of the interaction of criminal police units with pre-trial investigation agencies during the documenting of criminal offenses. The reasons for the implementation of the interaction, its principles, and the concept of actual data as the main constituent of interaction within the framework of information exchange are presented. It has been established that documenting carries a lot of semantic loads, which are combined in concerted activity aimed at achieving the goal, accomplishing tasks or achieving the result. Conclusions. Documenting as an independent element of evidence is ineffective. In order to bring the perpetrator to criminal responsibility, the results of documentation should be «legalized» in the criminal procedural law by conducting investigative (search) actions. In order to effectively ensure the implementation of justice, it is necessary to apply in the complex the operational-search and criminal-procedural, as well as other branches of law, which is conditioned and realized in the interaction of their subjects. On the basis of the analysis, the actual determination of the interaction of the criminal police units with the pre-trial investigation agencies during the documenting of criminal offenses is proposed.Keywords: interaction; subject; criminal police; secret investigative (search) actions; actual data; documentation.
刑事执法文书办理过程中公安机关与高级审查机构的中介作用
的目的。界定了刑事警察单位与审前侦查机关在刑事犯罪著录过程中相互作用的概念和本质,并界定了实施过程中存在的若干问题。方法。在写作过程中,运用了科学的分析、归纳、演绎方法。本文写作的理论基础是国内外学者对审前侦查机关和刑事警察单位的活动问题以及规制二者相互作用的规制行为的研究成果。科学的新奇。出版物的科学新颖性是对刑事犯罪著录过程中公安机关与审前侦查机关互动本质的系统分析。介绍了实现交互的原因、原理以及在信息交换框架内将实际数据作为交互的主要组成部分的概念。已经确定的是,文档承载了大量的语义负载,这些语义负载被组合在一起,以达到目标、完成任务或获得结果。结论。文件作为一个独立的证据要素是无效的。为了使犯罪者承担刑事责任,应当在刑事诉讼法中通过进行调查(搜查)行动使文件的结果“合法化”。为了有效地确保司法的执行,有必要在复杂的情况下适用业务-搜查和刑事-诉讼以及其他法律部门,这是在其主体的相互作用中形成和实现的。在此基础上,提出了刑事犯罪文书工作中刑事警察单位与审前侦查机关互动关系的实际确定。关键词:互动;主题;刑事警察;秘密调查(搜查)行动;实际数据;文档。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信