Public's Perspective on Civil Drones: Reasons to support and oppose

Vaishnavi Upadrasta, Rodney Leitner
{"title":"Public's Perspective on Civil Drones: Reasons to support and oppose","authors":"Vaishnavi Upadrasta, Rodney Leitner","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drone technology is prevailing in the mainstream market with its promising\n innovative potential across different application scenarios. While the technological\n capacity of drones is explored and developed, many have addressed the societal\n perceptions and reactions towards its use. Recent literature inclines towards more\n neutral if not positive perception by the general public. This paper, performed within a\n European Union project ADACORSA, explores the most relevant concepts for drone\n technology acceptance and presents a detailed overview of the survey-based research\n conducted in 2022. Data was collected from a total of 601 participants across Europe and\n ADACORSA partner countries largely from Germany, Austria, France, Greece and Turkey. To\n make the survey as accessible as possible, participants could take the survey in 16\n different languages. The performed risk analysis showed highest level of concerns\n related to security/privacy in terms of misuse and invasion of private spaces. Safety\n and privacy concerns are perceived as equally risky. Benefits analysis on the other hand\n revealed general public anticipates greater economic advantages but significantly lesser\n societal and environmental benefits. Apart from emergencies and humanitarian aid, and\n purposes to facilitate services that benefit society, industrial applications curtailed\n most support from the general public. Highest opposition was established for\n hobby/recreation-related drone use, primarily from individuals who have never used a\n drone. The objective of this paper is both to understand general public’s acceptance\n towards the use of drones and to provide a nuanced overview to drone operators of which\n purposes are perceived as reasonable and are accepted by the general public.","PeriodicalId":383834,"journal":{"name":"Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET-AI 2023): Artificial\n Intelligence and Future Applications","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET-AI 2023): Artificial\n Intelligence and Future Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drone technology is prevailing in the mainstream market with its promising innovative potential across different application scenarios. While the technological capacity of drones is explored and developed, many have addressed the societal perceptions and reactions towards its use. Recent literature inclines towards more neutral if not positive perception by the general public. This paper, performed within a European Union project ADACORSA, explores the most relevant concepts for drone technology acceptance and presents a detailed overview of the survey-based research conducted in 2022. Data was collected from a total of 601 participants across Europe and ADACORSA partner countries largely from Germany, Austria, France, Greece and Turkey. To make the survey as accessible as possible, participants could take the survey in 16 different languages. The performed risk analysis showed highest level of concerns related to security/privacy in terms of misuse and invasion of private spaces. Safety and privacy concerns are perceived as equally risky. Benefits analysis on the other hand revealed general public anticipates greater economic advantages but significantly lesser societal and environmental benefits. Apart from emergencies and humanitarian aid, and purposes to facilitate services that benefit society, industrial applications curtailed most support from the general public. Highest opposition was established for hobby/recreation-related drone use, primarily from individuals who have never used a drone. The objective of this paper is both to understand general public’s acceptance towards the use of drones and to provide a nuanced overview to drone operators of which purposes are perceived as reasonable and are accepted by the general public.
公众对民用无人机的看法:支持和反对的理由
无人机技术在主流市场中占据主导地位,在不同的应用场景中具有广阔的创新潜力。在探索和开发无人机技术能力的同时,许多人已经解决了社会对其使用的看法和反应。最近的文献倾向于更中立,如果不是积极的看法,一般公众。本文在欧盟ADACORSA项目中进行,探讨了无人机技术接受的最相关概念,并对2022年进行的基于调查的研究进行了详细概述。数据来自欧洲和ADACORSA合作伙伴国家的601名参与者,主要来自德国、奥地利、法国、希腊和土耳其。为了使调查尽可能方便,参与者可以用16种不同的语言进行调查。所进行的风险分析显示,在滥用和侵犯私人空间方面,与安全/隐私有关的担忧程度最高。安全和隐私问题被认为同样危险。另一方面,效益分析显示,公众期望更大的经济效益,但显著降低社会和环境效益。除了紧急情况和人道主义援助以及促进造福社会的服务的目的外,工业应用减少了来自公众的大部分支持。最反对的是与业余爱好/娱乐相关的无人机使用,主要来自从未使用过无人机的个人。本文的目的是了解公众对使用无人机的接受程度,并为无人机操作员提供细致入微的概述,其中目的被认为是合理的,并被公众接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信