Stock Investment According to Classic and Contemporary Ulama Views: Comparative Law Studies

Gusti Rian Saputra, Chairul Majid Nasution, Irfa Luthfia Rahmani, Agitya Agung Tridiarto
{"title":"Stock Investment According to Classic and Contemporary Ulama Views: Comparative Law Studies","authors":"Gusti Rian Saputra, Chairul Majid Nasution, Irfa Luthfia Rahmani, Agitya Agung Tridiarto","doi":"10.24090/icip.v1i1.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an increase in stock problems in the contemporary era. Various economic issues no longer have conventional nuances but are integrated with the digital world. Numerous applications and website portals have been created that promise attractive profits when investing and selling shares on their forums. Investing in stocks became a lucrative business with little effort put into its application. The highest power is vested in the largest shareholder, not in workers who have direct contact with the business it self. Problems arise when discussing the legal validity of the event. This is due to the presence of trade monopoly indications and capitalist elements. Furthermore, the concrete stock issues never discussed by classical ulemas are likely to differ from those discussed by current ulemas living in modern or postmodern society. Therefore, it is considered far more relevant to view contemporary economic problems such as stocks in light of contemporary ulema's views. This article examines the views of famous classical ulemas of their time, as well as contemporary ulemas, regarding stocks in general. This study uses a comparative analysis with a normative review of Islamic law and positive law in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":123211,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Philantrophy","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Philantrophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/icip.v1i1.309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an increase in stock problems in the contemporary era. Various economic issues no longer have conventional nuances but are integrated with the digital world. Numerous applications and website portals have been created that promise attractive profits when investing and selling shares on their forums. Investing in stocks became a lucrative business with little effort put into its application. The highest power is vested in the largest shareholder, not in workers who have direct contact with the business it self. Problems arise when discussing the legal validity of the event. This is due to the presence of trade monopoly indications and capitalist elements. Furthermore, the concrete stock issues never discussed by classical ulemas are likely to differ from those discussed by current ulemas living in modern or postmodern society. Therefore, it is considered far more relevant to view contemporary economic problems such as stocks in light of contemporary ulema's views. This article examines the views of famous classical ulemas of their time, as well as contemporary ulemas, regarding stocks in general. This study uses a comparative analysis with a normative review of Islamic law and positive law in Indonesia.
古典与当代乌拉玛观点下的股票投资:比较法研究
在当代,库存问题有所增加。各种经济问题不再有传统的细微差别,而是与数字世界融为一体。许多应用程序和门户网站已经创建,承诺在其论坛上投资和出售股票可以获得可观的利润。投资股票变成了一项有利可图的生意,几乎不需要付出什么努力。最高权力属于最大的股东,而不是与企业直接接触的工人。在讨论事件的法律效力时出现了问题。这是由于存在贸易垄断迹象和资本主义因素。此外,古典乌里玛从未讨论过的具体股票问题可能与生活在现代或后现代社会的当前乌里玛所讨论的问题不同。因此,根据当代乌里玛的观点来看待股票等当代经济问题,被认为是更为相关的。本文考察了著名的古典乌里马斯的观点,他们的时间,以及当代乌里马斯,关于股票一般。本研究采用比较分析与印度尼西亚伊斯兰法和成文法的规范性审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信