Comparison of top- and bottom-contact pentacene field-effect transistors using photocurrent microscopy

A. Masurkar, I. Kymissis
{"title":"Comparison of top- and bottom-contact pentacene field-effect transistors using photocurrent microscopy","authors":"A. Masurkar, I. Kymissis","doi":"10.1109/DRC.2016.7548429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Overview Bottom-contact (BC) organic field-effect transistors (OFETs), though more industry-relevant than top-contact (TC) OFETs, are prone to low source-drain currents. The underlying mechanisms behind this remain debated. Thus, our work uses photocurrent microscopy (PCM) to examine charge injection in BC and TC geometries. PCM maps were generated first for OFETs with no electrode or gate dielectric treatments. Potential plots were quantitatively derived from the results using a method from previous work. [1] PCM maps were then collected for devices treated with 1. pentafluorobenzenethiol (PFBT), known to improve semiconductor morphology [2], and 2. UV-ozone, which is thought to enhance trap-assisted carrier transport. [3] These treatments were chosen, because they significantly increase source-drain current in BC devices, but in vastly different ways. In addition, unlike other photocurrent studies, we used a range of illumination wavelengths so as to probe various exciton states.","PeriodicalId":310524,"journal":{"name":"2016 74th Annual Device Research Conference (DRC)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 74th Annual Device Research Conference (DRC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRC.2016.7548429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Overview Bottom-contact (BC) organic field-effect transistors (OFETs), though more industry-relevant than top-contact (TC) OFETs, are prone to low source-drain currents. The underlying mechanisms behind this remain debated. Thus, our work uses photocurrent microscopy (PCM) to examine charge injection in BC and TC geometries. PCM maps were generated first for OFETs with no electrode or gate dielectric treatments. Potential plots were quantitatively derived from the results using a method from previous work. [1] PCM maps were then collected for devices treated with 1. pentafluorobenzenethiol (PFBT), known to improve semiconductor morphology [2], and 2. UV-ozone, which is thought to enhance trap-assisted carrier transport. [3] These treatments were chosen, because they significantly increase source-drain current in BC devices, but in vastly different ways. In addition, unlike other photocurrent studies, we used a range of illumination wavelengths so as to probe various exciton states.
用光电流显微镜比较顶触和底触并五苯场效应晶体管
底触点(BC)有机场效应晶体管(ofet)虽然比顶触点(TC) ofet更具有工业相关性,但容易产生低源极漏极电流。这背后的潜在机制仍存在争议。因此,我们的工作使用光电流显微镜(PCM)来检查BC和TC几何形状中的电荷注入。首先对没有电极或栅极介质处理的ofet生成PCM图。利用以前工作的方法从结果中定量导出势图。[1]然后收集1处理设备的PCM图。五氟苯硫醇(PFBT),已知可改善半导体形态[2];紫外线臭氧,它被认为可以增强捕集器辅助的载流子运输。[3]之所以选择这些处理方法,是因为它们显著增加了BC器件的源极漏极电流,但方式却大不相同。此外,与其他光电流研究不同的是,我们使用了一定范围的照明波长来探测各种激子状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信