Economic Growth, Social Policy, and Poverty

L. Kenworthy
{"title":"Economic Growth, Social Policy, and Poverty","authors":"L. Kenworthy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1666931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether economic growth or social policy does more to benefit the poor is the subject of longstanding interest and debate. I examine the experiences of the world's affluent countries during a period of two and a half decades for which reliable comparative data are available. Over this period, from 1980 to 2005, improvements in low-end (tenth-percentile) absolute incomes were driven chiefly by increases in GDP per capita rather than by increases in the share of GDP going to government social expenditures. Economic growth did not, however, always and everywhere translate into income growth for the poor. Some rich nations — Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, the United Kingdom (1980-95), and the United States (1980-95 and 2000-05) — experienced lengthy periods of economic growth with little or no rise in the incomes of low-end households. When growth has trickled down to the poor, government transfers have been the principal conduit. It is in countries that have increased transfers in concert with per capita GDP that the incomes of the poor have been most likely to rise.","PeriodicalId":350026,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Human Development in Developing Economies (Topic)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Human Development in Developing Economies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1666931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Whether economic growth or social policy does more to benefit the poor is the subject of longstanding interest and debate. I examine the experiences of the world's affluent countries during a period of two and a half decades for which reliable comparative data are available. Over this period, from 1980 to 2005, improvements in low-end (tenth-percentile) absolute incomes were driven chiefly by increases in GDP per capita rather than by increases in the share of GDP going to government social expenditures. Economic growth did not, however, always and everywhere translate into income growth for the poor. Some rich nations — Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, the United Kingdom (1980-95), and the United States (1980-95 and 2000-05) — experienced lengthy periods of economic growth with little or no rise in the incomes of low-end households. When growth has trickled down to the poor, government transfers have been the principal conduit. It is in countries that have increased transfers in concert with per capita GDP that the incomes of the poor have been most likely to rise.
经济增长、社会政策和贫困
究竟是经济增长还是社会政策更有利于穷人,这是人们长期关注和争论的主题。我研究了世界上富裕国家在25年期间的经验,这些经验可以获得可靠的比较数据。在此期间,从1980年到2005年,低端(10%)绝对收入的提高主要是由人均GDP的增长推动的,而不是由GDP中用于政府社会支出的份额的增加推动的。然而,经济增长并不总是在任何地方转化为穷人的收入增长。一些富裕国家——澳大利亚、加拿大、德国、意大利、瑞士、英国(1980- 1995年)和美国(1980- 1995年和2000- 2005年)——经历了长时间的经济增长,但低端家庭的收入几乎没有增长。当经济增长惠及穷人时,政府转移支付一直是主要渠道。在那些与人均国内生产总值同步增加转移支付的国家,穷人的收入最有可能增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信