A CONTEXTUAL ASSESSMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION’S ENERGY SUPPLIES IN MID 2022

Ecaterina-Elena C. Matoi
{"title":"A CONTEXTUAL ASSESSMENT OF EUROPEAN UNION’S ENERGY SUPPLIES IN MID 2022","authors":"Ecaterina-Elena C. Matoi","doi":"10.53477/1842-9904-22-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the pandemic, European Union’s decisions that backfire on its economy appear to be controversial. Bruxelles politicians oscillate between renewable energies and possible new hydrocarbon sources in a bid to eliminate Russian supplies. The study reveals that the EU has actually had problems with energy independence ever since the oil age began. The historical superpower approach on oil and gas adopted by USA and Russian Federation, a still relevant UK, combined with the rise of China as economic leader, leave little room for the EU to gain control over its energy supplies. The study identifies a sinuous relation between USA and the former USSR in terms of energy trade, but not only: while the two countries collaborated on different issues in recent history, their interests were both convergent and divergent and their approaches to international relations as well. Among others, the study identifies France as the single country with a company in top 10 world oil and gas companies by revenue, and the only EU country with a company in top 4 manufacturers of nuclear fuel at global level. The study concludes that unless the energy paradigm will shift significantly, EU’s chances to become energy independent are minimal.","PeriodicalId":251956,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Impact","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Impact","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53477/1842-9904-22-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the pandemic, European Union’s decisions that backfire on its economy appear to be controversial. Bruxelles politicians oscillate between renewable energies and possible new hydrocarbon sources in a bid to eliminate Russian supplies. The study reveals that the EU has actually had problems with energy independence ever since the oil age began. The historical superpower approach on oil and gas adopted by USA and Russian Federation, a still relevant UK, combined with the rise of China as economic leader, leave little room for the EU to gain control over its energy supplies. The study identifies a sinuous relation between USA and the former USSR in terms of energy trade, but not only: while the two countries collaborated on different issues in recent history, their interests were both convergent and divergent and their approaches to international relations as well. Among others, the study identifies France as the single country with a company in top 10 world oil and gas companies by revenue, and the only EU country with a company in top 4 manufacturers of nuclear fuel at global level. The study concludes that unless the energy paradigm will shift significantly, EU’s chances to become energy independent are minimal.
2022年中期欧盟能源供应的背景评估
大流行之后,欧盟的决定对其经济产生了适得其反的影响,这似乎引起了争议。布鲁塞尔的政客们在可再生能源和可能的新碳氢化合物资源之间摇摆不定,试图消除俄罗斯的供应。该研究表明,自石油时代开始以来,欧盟在能源独立方面实际上一直存在问题。美国和俄罗斯在石油和天然气方面的历史超级大国路线,以及仍然重要的英国,再加上中国作为经济领袖的崛起,让欧盟几乎没有空间控制其能源供应。该研究确定了美国和前苏联在能源贸易方面的曲折关系,但不仅如此:虽然两国在最近的历史上在不同的问题上合作,但他们的利益既有趋同又有分歧,他们对国际关系的态度也是如此。其中,法国是唯一一个在全球石油和天然气公司收入排名前十的国家,也是唯一一个在全球核燃料制造商排名前四的欧盟国家。该研究的结论是,除非能源模式发生重大转变,否则欧盟实现能源独立的机会微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信