CLASSROOM COMMUNICATIVE STRUCTURE: EXCHANGE STRUCTURE IN EFL CLASS IN PUBLIC SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3 MOJOKERTO

Reza Fitri Rafsanjani, N. K. Mirahayuni
{"title":"CLASSROOM COMMUNICATIVE STRUCTURE: EXCHANGE STRUCTURE IN EFL CLASS IN PUBLIC SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3 MOJOKERTO","authors":"Reza Fitri Rafsanjani, N. K. Mirahayuni","doi":"10.30996/anaphora.v1i1.2085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reported the study about classroom communicative structure between teacher and students in English class in Public School High School 3 Mojokerto. This study aims to identify the elements of minimal exchange structure and general exchange structure in communication in classroom. This study uses minimal exchange structure theory of Strenstrom (1994) by qualitative descriptive method. Data in this study are obtained from the recording of conversation among teacher and students of XI grade in Speaking class. The result shows that there are three (3) types  of act as the element of exchange structure:  Initiating, Responding, dan Following-Up (I-R-F). Minimal exchange structure  consists of: Initiating-Responding (I-R) or Initiating-Responding-Following Up (I-R-F). General structure of exchange in classroom situation consists of: greeting, followed by any kinds of functions such as giving information, giving order, and asking question. In conversation, teacher tends to has initiative to start it, meanwhile, the students tend to give respond by doing activity (evade) which are instructed by the teacher. The students sometimes did not answer the question, therefore teacher keeps the conversation going by undergone initiative actions such as giving information, asking question or giving instruction. This study shows that teacher has power to supervise and keep going the class activity.  It is needed to do further study  on power aspect in classroom communication.","PeriodicalId":269505,"journal":{"name":"ANAPHORA: Journal of Language, Literary and Cultural Studies","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANAPHORA: Journal of Language, Literary and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30996/anaphora.v1i1.2085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reported the study about classroom communicative structure between teacher and students in English class in Public School High School 3 Mojokerto. This study aims to identify the elements of minimal exchange structure and general exchange structure in communication in classroom. This study uses minimal exchange structure theory of Strenstrom (1994) by qualitative descriptive method. Data in this study are obtained from the recording of conversation among teacher and students of XI grade in Speaking class. The result shows that there are three (3) types  of act as the element of exchange structure:  Initiating, Responding, dan Following-Up (I-R-F). Minimal exchange structure  consists of: Initiating-Responding (I-R) or Initiating-Responding-Following Up (I-R-F). General structure of exchange in classroom situation consists of: greeting, followed by any kinds of functions such as giving information, giving order, and asking question. In conversation, teacher tends to has initiative to start it, meanwhile, the students tend to give respond by doing activity (evade) which are instructed by the teacher. The students sometimes did not answer the question, therefore teacher keeps the conversation going by undergone initiative actions such as giving information, asking question or giving instruction. This study shows that teacher has power to supervise and keep going the class activity.  It is needed to do further study  on power aspect in classroom communication.
课堂交际结构:公立高中英语课堂的交际结构
本文对Mojokerto公立高中英语课堂的师生交际结构进行了研究。本研究旨在找出课堂交际中最小交换结构和一般交换结构的要素。本研究采用strstrom(1994)的最小交换结构理论,采用定性描述的方法。本研究的数据来源于11年级口语课的师生对话录音。结果表明,有三(3)个typesÂ构成交换结构的要素:Â发起、响应和跟进(I-R-F)。最小交换structureÂ包括:发起-响应(I-R)或发起-响应-跟进(I-R- f)。课堂交际的一般结构包括:问候,然后是提供信息、下达命令、提出问题等各种功能。在对话中,教师往往主动发起对话,而学生则在教师的指导下通过做一些活动(逃避)来做出回应。学生有时没有回答问题,因此教师通过主动提供信息,提问或指导等行动使对话继续进行。本研究表明,教师在课堂活动中具有监督和持续进行的能力。Â在课堂交际的权力方面需要进一步做studyÂ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信