Dissociation of Measures of Topographical and Non-topographical Cognitive Ability in Older Adults

F. Previc, R. A. Ross, G. Siegel
{"title":"Dissociation of Measures of Topographical and \nNon-topographical Cognitive Ability in Older Adults","authors":"F. Previc, R. A. Ross, G. Siegel","doi":"10.33805/2641-8991.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between topographical and non-topographical cognitive measures was studied for 25 elderly participants. The topographical measures were the Camden Topographical Recognition Memory Test (CTRMT), a Topographical Mental Rotation Test (TMRT), and a Virtual Pond Maze (VPM). The non-topographical tests were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Trail-Making Test-B (TMT-B), and a matching-to-sample Visual Short-Term Memory Test (VSMT). Only the correlation (0.48) between the TMT-B and the TMRT attained significance; the bivariate correlations among the three topographical measures were modest, ranging from 29 to 33, although they did correlate highly with a topographic composite score (0.69-0.78). A factor analysis yielded a further distinction between the topographical and non-topographical measures. Loadings for the three topographical measures on a presumed “topographical” factor ranged from 0.62 to 0.71 but only from 0.17 to 0.23 for the second factor. The MoCA and TMT-B loaded on both factors, while the VSMT measure loaded poorly (-0.03) on the topographical factor but highly (0.89) on the second factor. The results suggest that standard measures of cognitive function may not be optimal for specific assessment of topographical abilities, the best predictor of impending Alzheimer’s dementia.","PeriodicalId":315780,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiology and Rehabilitation","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiology and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33805/2641-8991.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between topographical and non-topographical cognitive measures was studied for 25 elderly participants. The topographical measures were the Camden Topographical Recognition Memory Test (CTRMT), a Topographical Mental Rotation Test (TMRT), and a Virtual Pond Maze (VPM). The non-topographical tests were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Trail-Making Test-B (TMT-B), and a matching-to-sample Visual Short-Term Memory Test (VSMT). Only the correlation (0.48) between the TMT-B and the TMRT attained significance; the bivariate correlations among the three topographical measures were modest, ranging from 29 to 33, although they did correlate highly with a topographic composite score (0.69-0.78). A factor analysis yielded a further distinction between the topographical and non-topographical measures. Loadings for the three topographical measures on a presumed “topographical” factor ranged from 0.62 to 0.71 but only from 0.17 to 0.23 for the second factor. The MoCA and TMT-B loaded on both factors, while the VSMT measure loaded poorly (-0.03) on the topographical factor but highly (0.89) on the second factor. The results suggest that standard measures of cognitive function may not be optimal for specific assessment of topographical abilities, the best predictor of impending Alzheimer’s dementia.
老年人地形和非地形认知能力测量的分离
对25名老年受试者进行地形与非地形认知测量的关系研究。地形测量包括Camden地形识别记忆测验(CTRMT)、地形心理旋转测验(TMRT)和虚拟池塘迷宫(VPM)。非地形测试是蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、轨迹测试b (TMT-B)和匹配样本视觉短期记忆测试(VSMT)。TMT-B与TMRT之间只有0.48的相关性达到显著性;三种地形测量之间的双变量相关性不大,范围从29到33,尽管它们确实与地形综合得分高度相关(0.69-0.78)。因子分析进一步区分了地形测量和非地形测量。在假定的“地形”因素上,三种地形测量的负荷范围为0.62至0.71,但第二种因素的负荷范围仅为0.17至0.23。MoCA和TMT-B在地形因子上的负荷较低(-0.03),但在地形因子上的负荷较高(0.89)。结果表明,认知功能的标准测量可能不是地形能力的最佳评估,地形能力是即将发生的阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症的最佳预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信