Adenoprosin in the complex treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in combination with prostatitis of category III

A. Polishchuk, S. Shkodkin, K. S. Shkodkin
{"title":"Adenoprosin in the complex treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in combination with prostatitis of category III","authors":"A. Polishchuk, S. Shkodkin, K. S. Shkodkin","doi":"10.17650/1726-9784-2022-23-1-76-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The problem of effective and safe therapy of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis of category III remains relevant, despite the numerosity of the drugs used in different groups. Under these conditions, the search for new pharmacological agents continues.The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy of Adenoprosin in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction in patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome and prostate hyperplasia.Materials and methods. The 90-day study included 60 patients aged 40 to 60 years with chronic pelvic pain syndrome and erectile dysfunction on the background of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients of the main group received alfa-1-adrenoreceptor blocker tamsulosin for 30 days in combination with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug nimesulide for 5 days and Adenoprosin suppositories. The men of the control group took tamsulosin for 30 days and nimesulide for 5 days. Over the next 60 days, the dynamics was evaluated based on the data from the NIH-CPSI (National Institutes Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index), IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score), QoL (Quality of Life Scale), AMS (Aging Male Symptoms), IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function); urination diary analysis; general urine analysis; blood test for the level of prostate specific antigen, glucose; prostate secretion analysis; transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate gland with measurement of residual urine; uroflowmetry.Results. Urinary frequency decreased at day 30 in the treatment group from 12.7 ± 1.4 to 7.3 ± 1.8 micturitions per day, in the control group from 13.1 ± 1.8 to 9.6 ± 1.1; subsequently (on days 60 and 90) positive effect persisted in the treatment group, while in the control group urinary frequency increased. Per the NIH-CPSI questionnaire, symptoms decreased at day 30: in the treatment group from 25.4 ± 2.1 to 12.3 ± 1.9 points, in the control group from 24.3 ± 1.7 to 17.6 ± 0.4 points; in the treatment group the trend towards symptom decrease remained, while in the control group symptoms increased at day 90. IPSS score at day 30 decreased in the treatment group from 12.9 ± 0.5 to 5.2 ± 1.4, in the control group from 14.1 ± 0.7 to 8.2 ± 0.9; further decrease was observed in both groups at day 60, but at day 90 the score increased (higher in the control group). Quality of life (QoL) improved in both groups at day 30 (in the treatment group 1.4 ± 0.6 points, in the control group 3.1 ± 0.8). Erectile function improved per the IIEF-5 questionnaire: in the treatment group from 11.5 ± 1.1 to 18.9 ± 1.4 points at day 30 with further positive tendency, in the control group from 10.7 ± 1.4 to 15.3 ± 1.1 points with subsequent negative dynamics. Uroflowmetry showed positive dynamics of Q max at the end of treatment in the treatment (from 8.3 ± 1.5 to 14.7 ± 1.1 mL/s) and control (from 8.8 ± 1.3 to 13.1 ± 1.6 mL/s) groups, with its further decrease. Prostate volume in the treatment group was about 33.5 ± 3.1 cm3 at day 90 (with baseline volume 42.6 ± 2.5 cm3), in the control group it was 41.6 ± 1.9 cm3 (with baseline volume of 43.1±1.4 cm3). No significant changes in urine tests, prostatic fluid, prostate-specific antigen level, and blood glucose were observed during the treatment.Conclusions. The study shows that administration of tamsulosin with Adenoprosin in patients with BPH and category III prostatitis is advantageous compared to administration of only alfa-1-adrenoreceptor blockers.","PeriodicalId":368206,"journal":{"name":"Andrology and Genital Surgery","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andrology and Genital Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9784-2022-23-1-76-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. The problem of effective and safe therapy of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis of category III remains relevant, despite the numerosity of the drugs used in different groups. Under these conditions, the search for new pharmacological agents continues.The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy of Adenoprosin in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction in patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome and prostate hyperplasia.Materials and methods. The 90-day study included 60 patients aged 40 to 60 years with chronic pelvic pain syndrome and erectile dysfunction on the background of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients of the main group received alfa-1-adrenoreceptor blocker tamsulosin for 30 days in combination with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug nimesulide for 5 days and Adenoprosin suppositories. The men of the control group took tamsulosin for 30 days and nimesulide for 5 days. Over the next 60 days, the dynamics was evaluated based on the data from the NIH-CPSI (National Institutes Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index), IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score), QoL (Quality of Life Scale), AMS (Aging Male Symptoms), IIEF-5 (International Index of Erectile Function); urination diary analysis; general urine analysis; blood test for the level of prostate specific antigen, glucose; prostate secretion analysis; transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate gland with measurement of residual urine; uroflowmetry.Results. Urinary frequency decreased at day 30 in the treatment group from 12.7 ± 1.4 to 7.3 ± 1.8 micturitions per day, in the control group from 13.1 ± 1.8 to 9.6 ± 1.1; subsequently (on days 60 and 90) positive effect persisted in the treatment group, while in the control group urinary frequency increased. Per the NIH-CPSI questionnaire, symptoms decreased at day 30: in the treatment group from 25.4 ± 2.1 to 12.3 ± 1.9 points, in the control group from 24.3 ± 1.7 to 17.6 ± 0.4 points; in the treatment group the trend towards symptom decrease remained, while in the control group symptoms increased at day 90. IPSS score at day 30 decreased in the treatment group from 12.9 ± 0.5 to 5.2 ± 1.4, in the control group from 14.1 ± 0.7 to 8.2 ± 0.9; further decrease was observed in both groups at day 60, but at day 90 the score increased (higher in the control group). Quality of life (QoL) improved in both groups at day 30 (in the treatment group 1.4 ± 0.6 points, in the control group 3.1 ± 0.8). Erectile function improved per the IIEF-5 questionnaire: in the treatment group from 11.5 ± 1.1 to 18.9 ± 1.4 points at day 30 with further positive tendency, in the control group from 10.7 ± 1.4 to 15.3 ± 1.1 points with subsequent negative dynamics. Uroflowmetry showed positive dynamics of Q max at the end of treatment in the treatment (from 8.3 ± 1.5 to 14.7 ± 1.1 mL/s) and control (from 8.8 ± 1.3 to 13.1 ± 1.6 mL/s) groups, with its further decrease. Prostate volume in the treatment group was about 33.5 ± 3.1 cm3 at day 90 (with baseline volume 42.6 ± 2.5 cm3), in the control group it was 41.6 ± 1.9 cm3 (with baseline volume of 43.1±1.4 cm3). No significant changes in urine tests, prostatic fluid, prostate-specific antigen level, and blood glucose were observed during the treatment.Conclusions. The study shows that administration of tamsulosin with Adenoprosin in patients with BPH and category III prostatitis is advantageous compared to administration of only alfa-1-adrenoreceptor blockers.
腺苷蛋白酶在复合治疗下尿路症状合并前列腺炎的第三类
介绍。尽管在不同组中使用的药物数量众多,但对良性前列腺增生和III类前列腺炎患者的有效和安全治疗问题仍然存在。在这种情况下,寻找新的药理学制剂仍在继续。本研究目的是评价腺苷蛋白酶治疗慢性盆腔疼痛综合征伴前列腺增生患者下尿路症状及勃起功能障碍的疗效。材料和方法。这项为期90天的研究纳入了60名年龄在40至60岁之间,以良性前列腺增生为背景的慢性盆腔疼痛综合征和勃起功能障碍患者。主组患者给予α -1-肾上腺素受体阻滞剂坦索罗辛治疗30天,联合非甾体类抗炎药尼美舒利治疗5天,并用腺苷脂栓剂治疗。对照组患者服用坦索罗辛30天,尼美舒利5天。在接下来的60天里,根据NIH-CPSI(美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数)、IPSS(国际前列腺症状评分)、QoL(生活质量量表)、AMS(男性衰老症状)、IIEF-5(国际勃起功能指数)的数据来评估动态;尿日记分析;一般尿液分析;血液检查前列腺特异性抗原、葡萄糖水平;前列腺分泌物分析;经直肠前列腺超声检查伴残余尿量测定uroflowmetry.Results。第30天,治疗组尿频由12.7±1.4次/天降至7.3±1.8次/天,对照组由13.1±1.8次降至9.6±1.1次/天;随后(第60天和第90天),治疗组的积极作用持续存在,而对照组的尿频增加。根据NIH-CPSI问卷,症状在第30天减轻:治疗组从25.4±2.1分降至12.3±1.9分,对照组从24.3±1.7分降至17.6±0.4分;治疗组症状持续减轻,对照组症状在第90天加重。治疗组第30天IPSS评分由12.9±0.5降至5.2±1.4,对照组由14.1±0.7降至8.2±0.9;两组在第60天均进一步下降,但在第90天评分升高(对照组较高)。两组患者在治疗第30天的生活质量(QoL)均有改善(治疗组1.4±0.6分,对照组3.1±0.8分)。根据IIEF-5问卷,勃起功能得到改善:治疗组在第30天从11.5±1.1分提高到18.9±1.4分,并有进一步的积极趋势,对照组从10.7±1.4分提高到15.3±1.1分,随后出现消极趋势。尿流测量显示,治疗组(从8.3±1.5 mL/s到14.7±1.1 mL/s)和对照组(从8.8±1.3 mL/s到13.1±1.6 mL/s)治疗结束时Q max呈阳性动态变化,并进一步降低。治疗组第90天前列腺体积约33.5±3.1 cm3(基线42.6±2.5 cm3),对照组41.6±1.9 cm3(基线43.1±1.4 cm3)。治疗期间尿、前列腺液、前列腺特异性抗原、血糖无明显变化。研究表明,与仅使用α -1-肾上腺素受体阻滞剂相比,在前列腺增生和III类前列腺炎患者中使用坦索罗辛和腺苷蛋白是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信