Effect of Drip Irrigation and Fertilization Timing and Rate on Yield of Onion

J. Rumpel, S. Kaniszewski, J. Dyśko
{"title":"Effect of Drip Irrigation and Fertilization Timing and Rate on Yield of Onion","authors":"J. Rumpel, S. Kaniszewski, J. Dyśko","doi":"10.1300/J068v09n02_08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is insufficient information on the effects of drip irrigation and drip fertigation with nitrogen on growth and development of onions. The aim of the present work was to investigate the possibility of using these techniques in connection with fertilization, where nitrogen is split into preplant and side-dress application, that is used in onion (Allium cepa L.) production. Yield of spring sown onion (cvs. Riviera F1 and Utopia F1 in 1999 and cv. Riviera F1 only in 2000), were investigated in field experiments on a sandy-loam soil. Nitrogen fertilization consisted of a preplant application of 50 kg·ha−1 N incorporated in all treatments, and a side-dress application of: (1) 50 kg·ha−1 N in dry form without irrigation, (2) 50 kg·ha−1 N in dry form plus drip irrigation, or (3) 50, or (4) 150, or (5) 250 kg·ha−1 N in surface fertigation, applied through drip lines, and (6) 150 kg·ha−1 N in subsurface fertigation, applied through buried drip lines. In comparison with the not irrigated or fertigated control, addition of 50 kg·ha−1 N in dry form to the drip irrigated treatment 2 resulted in a significant marketable yield increase of both onion cultivars (cv. Riviera F1–18% and cv. Utopia F1–28%). Marketable yield increased as a result of application of 50 kg·ha−1 N, with fertigation (treatment 3, i.e., cv. Riviera F1–27% and cv. Utopia F1–55%). Fertigation N rates higher than 50 kg·ha−1 (treatments 4 to 6) did not increase onion yields. In 2000, the yield increase due to application of N in dry form and irrigation (treatment 2) was not significant. Higher marketable yields were produced when the 50 kg·ha−1 N rate was applied through drip fertigation (41% increase, treatment 3) and highest after applying 150 kg·ha−1 N (treatment 4) through fertigation (79% increase as compared to the control). Subsurface fertigation (treatment 6) had similar effects on yield as did surface fertigation. Irrigation and fertilization had little affect on total N concentration in onion plants.","PeriodicalId":169819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetable Crop Production","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J068v09n02_08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is insufficient information on the effects of drip irrigation and drip fertigation with nitrogen on growth and development of onions. The aim of the present work was to investigate the possibility of using these techniques in connection with fertilization, where nitrogen is split into preplant and side-dress application, that is used in onion (Allium cepa L.) production. Yield of spring sown onion (cvs. Riviera F1 and Utopia F1 in 1999 and cv. Riviera F1 only in 2000), were investigated in field experiments on a sandy-loam soil. Nitrogen fertilization consisted of a preplant application of 50 kg·ha−1 N incorporated in all treatments, and a side-dress application of: (1) 50 kg·ha−1 N in dry form without irrigation, (2) 50 kg·ha−1 N in dry form plus drip irrigation, or (3) 50, or (4) 150, or (5) 250 kg·ha−1 N in surface fertigation, applied through drip lines, and (6) 150 kg·ha−1 N in subsurface fertigation, applied through buried drip lines. In comparison with the not irrigated or fertigated control, addition of 50 kg·ha−1 N in dry form to the drip irrigated treatment 2 resulted in a significant marketable yield increase of both onion cultivars (cv. Riviera F1–18% and cv. Utopia F1–28%). Marketable yield increased as a result of application of 50 kg·ha−1 N, with fertigation (treatment 3, i.e., cv. Riviera F1–27% and cv. Utopia F1–55%). Fertigation N rates higher than 50 kg·ha−1 (treatments 4 to 6) did not increase onion yields. In 2000, the yield increase due to application of N in dry form and irrigation (treatment 2) was not significant. Higher marketable yields were produced when the 50 kg·ha−1 N rate was applied through drip fertigation (41% increase, treatment 3) and highest after applying 150 kg·ha−1 N (treatment 4) through fertigation (79% increase as compared to the control). Subsurface fertigation (treatment 6) had similar effects on yield as did surface fertigation. Irrigation and fertilization had little affect on total N concentration in onion plants.
滴灌施肥时机和用量对洋葱产量的影响
关于滴灌和氮滴施肥对洋葱生长发育的影响,目前的研究还不充分。本研究的目的是探讨将这些技术与施肥相结合的可能性,其中氮被分为种植前和侧面施用,用于洋葱(Allium cepa L.)生产。春播洋葱产量(cvs.)里维埃拉F1和乌托邦F1在1999年和cv。里维埃拉F1仅在2000年),在沙质壤土上进行了实地试验。氮肥包括在所有处理中同时施用50 kg·ha−1 N,以及侧施:(1)50 kg·ha−1 N的干态不灌溉,(2)50 kg·ha−1 N的干态加滴灌,或(3)50、(4)150或(5)250 kg·ha−1 N的地表施肥,通过滴灌管道施用,以及(6)150 kg·ha−1 N的地下施肥,通过埋地滴灌管道施用。与不灌溉或不施肥的对照相比,滴灌处理2中添加50 kg·ha−1干态氮显著提高了两个洋葱品种的市场产量(cv。里维埃拉F1-18%和cv。乌托邦f1 - 28%)。施用50 kg·ha - 1 N,施肥(处理3,即cv。里维埃拉F1-27%和cv。乌托邦f1 - 55%)。施氮量高于50 kg·ha - 1(处理4 ~ 6)不能提高洋葱产量。2000年旱作和灌溉(处理2)施氮增产不显著。施用50 kg·ha - 1氮肥(处理3,增产41%)时,可售产量较高;施用150 kg·ha - 1氮肥(处理4,增产79%)时,可售产量最高。地下施肥(处理6)对产量的影响与地表施肥相似。灌溉和施肥对洋葱植株全氮含量影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信