The great primaeval contract of eternal society : Edmund Burke’s views on the social contract

P. Lurbe
{"title":"The great primaeval contract of eternal society : Edmund Burke’s views on the social contract","authors":"P. Lurbe","doi":"10.7220/2335-8769.63.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At first glance, the attempt to find common ground between Edmund Burke and Kristijonas Donelaitis is gratuitous and doomed to fail: biographically, nothing connects them, and they cannot even have heard of each other. Yet what they at least have in common is a deep-seated interest in the notions of time and duration: for the Lithuanian poet, the ever-recurring seasons provide human life with substance and pattern; for the Irish philosopher, they are of the essence of what nations are all about. As a critic of contractual theories, Burke argues that society is eternal, and proceeds from a primaval contract that was always there. He is particularly critical of the view that the earth belongs exclusively to the living, a view that has come to be associated with Thomas Jefferson: for Burke, if such were really the case, men would be no better than “the flies of a summer.” This image immediately conjures up a vision of the summer months, and makes us realize that Burke and Donelaitis are in fact kindred spirits: they share a common Protestant faith, a concern for the downtrodden peasantry, a view of the social contract as primaval, and the belief that men belong to deeply rooted, historical communities that make them truly human.","PeriodicalId":184184,"journal":{"name":"Deeds and Days","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deeds and Days","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-8769.63.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At first glance, the attempt to find common ground between Edmund Burke and Kristijonas Donelaitis is gratuitous and doomed to fail: biographically, nothing connects them, and they cannot even have heard of each other. Yet what they at least have in common is a deep-seated interest in the notions of time and duration: for the Lithuanian poet, the ever-recurring seasons provide human life with substance and pattern; for the Irish philosopher, they are of the essence of what nations are all about. As a critic of contractual theories, Burke argues that society is eternal, and proceeds from a primaval contract that was always there. He is particularly critical of the view that the earth belongs exclusively to the living, a view that has come to be associated with Thomas Jefferson: for Burke, if such were really the case, men would be no better than “the flies of a summer.” This image immediately conjures up a vision of the summer months, and makes us realize that Burke and Donelaitis are in fact kindred spirits: they share a common Protestant faith, a concern for the downtrodden peasantry, a view of the social contract as primaval, and the belief that men belong to deeply rooted, historical communities that make them truly human.
永恒社会的伟大原始契约:埃德蒙·伯克的社会契约观
乍一看,在埃德蒙·伯克和克里斯蒂乔纳斯·多内莱蒂斯之间寻找共同点的尝试是徒劳的,而且注定要失败:从传记的角度来看,他们之间没有任何联系,他们甚至不可能听说过对方。然而,他们至少有一个共同点,那就是对时间和持续时间的概念有着根深蒂固的兴趣:对立陶宛诗人来说,不断循环的季节为人类生活提供了物质和模式;对这位爱尔兰哲学家来说,它们是国家的精髓所在。作为契约理论的批判者,伯克认为社会是永恒的,并从一直存在的原始契约中发展而来。他特别批评地球只属于活着的人的观点,这种观点与托马斯·杰斐逊(Thomas Jefferson)联系在一起:对伯克来说,如果真是这样的话,人类就不会比“夏天的苍蝇”好多少了。这个形象立刻让人联想到夏季的景象,并让我们意识到伯克和多内莱蒂实际上是志同道合的:他们有共同的新教信仰,关心被压迫的农民,认为社会契约是原始的,并且相信人属于根深蒂固的历史共同体,这使他们成为真正的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信