The equivalent diameter of copper wire and gold wire based on the sweep stiffness evaluation in semiconductor packaging

H. Kung, Hung-Shyong Chen
{"title":"The equivalent diameter of copper wire and gold wire based on the sweep stiffness evaluation in semiconductor packaging","authors":"H. Kung, Hung-Shyong Chen","doi":"10.1109/EPTC.2009.5416578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As gold content accounts for the majority of bonding wire expense, wire diameter reduction is an effective way to reduce cost. However, it had been proved by authors' previous studies that the smaller the wire diameter is used, the smaller the sweep stiffness of wire bond will is. The lower sweep stiffness of the wire bond will always cause higher risk of wire sweep. To reduce cost, copper wire is an alterative way to replace gold wire. The advantages of using Cu instead of Au wire are the lower price, the higher electrical conductivity and the high resistance to wire sweep during plastic encapsulation, although, the oxidation problem of copper wire during bonding process needs to be overcome in the future. From the material property point of view, Cu is harder than Au, which represents the possible smaller diameter of wire can be used. Moreover, the introduction of Cu wire will lead to the further development of smaller pitch devices. In this paper, the corresponding diameters of gold wire and copper wire will be presented by the evaluation of sweep stiffness of wire bonds. Based on the results of sweep stiffness, the listed tables for the appropriate choice of gold wire diameter versus copper wire diameter can be proposed to reduce cost and, furthermore, provide smaller allowance standard of fine pitch in a chip.","PeriodicalId":256843,"journal":{"name":"2009 11th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 11th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2009.5416578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

As gold content accounts for the majority of bonding wire expense, wire diameter reduction is an effective way to reduce cost. However, it had been proved by authors' previous studies that the smaller the wire diameter is used, the smaller the sweep stiffness of wire bond will is. The lower sweep stiffness of the wire bond will always cause higher risk of wire sweep. To reduce cost, copper wire is an alterative way to replace gold wire. The advantages of using Cu instead of Au wire are the lower price, the higher electrical conductivity and the high resistance to wire sweep during plastic encapsulation, although, the oxidation problem of copper wire during bonding process needs to be overcome in the future. From the material property point of view, Cu is harder than Au, which represents the possible smaller diameter of wire can be used. Moreover, the introduction of Cu wire will lead to the further development of smaller pitch devices. In this paper, the corresponding diameters of gold wire and copper wire will be presented by the evaluation of sweep stiffness of wire bonds. Based on the results of sweep stiffness, the listed tables for the appropriate choice of gold wire diameter versus copper wire diameter can be proposed to reduce cost and, furthermore, provide smaller allowance standard of fine pitch in a chip.
基于半导体封装中扫描刚度评价的铜线和金线等效直径
由于含金量占焊线费用的大部分,因此减小焊线直径是降低成本的有效途径。然而,前人的研究已经证明,线材直径越小,线材粘结的扫描刚度越小。钢丝粘结的扫线刚度越低,钢丝扫线的风险越大。为了降低成本,铜线是一种替代金线的方法。使用铜代替金线的优点是价格更低,电导率更高,并且在塑料封装过程中具有较高的抗导线扫线能力,但铜线在键合过程中的氧化问题需要在未来克服。从材料性能的角度来看,Cu比Au更硬,这意味着可以使用更小直径的线材。此外,铜线的引入将导致更小间距器件的进一步发展。本文将通过对导线键的扫描刚度的评估,给出相应的金丝和铜丝的直径。根据扫描刚度的结果,可以提出金线直径与铜线直径的适当选择表,以降低成本,并且提供更小的芯片细间距余量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信