Evaluating the Harvest Rate Recommendation for Northern Bobwhites in South Texas

D. Woodard, L. Brennan, F. Hernández, H. Perotto‐Baldivieso, N. Wilkins, Andrea Montalvo
{"title":"Evaluating the Harvest Rate Recommendation for Northern Bobwhites in South Texas","authors":"D. Woodard, L. Brennan, F. Hernández, H. Perotto‐Baldivieso, N. Wilkins, Andrea Montalvo","doi":"10.7290/nqsp09fgm6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current harvest rate recommendation for northern bobwhites ( Colinus virginianus ; hereafter, bobwhite) in South Texas, USA is 20% of the autumn population, including crippling loss. This recommendation is based on population simulations of empirical data. We completed the first field evaluation of the 20% harvest recommendation by comparing prehunting and posthunting bobwhite density estimates on a hunted and nonhunted site in South Texas during the 2018–2019, 2019–2020, and 2020–2021 statewide bobwhite hunting seasons in Jim Hogg County, Texas. We conducted line-transect distance sampling surveys on 4 occasions per year (early November, mid-December, late January, early March) from a helicopter platform and prescribed the 20% annual bobwhite harvest from the November density estimate. According to our bobwhite density estimates, we found that bobwhite mortality (e.g., population decline) varied seasonally between hunted ( = 54% ± 3%) and nonhunted sites ( = 46% ± 5%). Our spring density estimates on both sites (i.e., hunted vs. nonhunted) were similar through the first 2 years but diverged in 2020–2021, with bobwhite densities that were 129% higher on the nonhunted site. Comparing our annual spring density results to the means reported from population models (i.e., 100-year simulations) used to create the 20% harvest recommendation, we found that the mean spring density of the model simulations was higher than our mean field estimates on both our hunted (+59%) and nonhunted sites (+77%). We recommend a conservative approach to prescribing a bobwhite harvest in South Texas, such as using the lower 95% confidence interval of a bobwhite abundance estimate for calculating harvest prescriptions, due to variability within density estimates and bobwhite survival in semiarid ranges.","PeriodicalId":205881,"journal":{"name":"National Quail Symposium Proceedings","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Quail Symposium Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7290/nqsp09fgm6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The current harvest rate recommendation for northern bobwhites ( Colinus virginianus ; hereafter, bobwhite) in South Texas, USA is 20% of the autumn population, including crippling loss. This recommendation is based on population simulations of empirical data. We completed the first field evaluation of the 20% harvest recommendation by comparing prehunting and posthunting bobwhite density estimates on a hunted and nonhunted site in South Texas during the 2018–2019, 2019–2020, and 2020–2021 statewide bobwhite hunting seasons in Jim Hogg County, Texas. We conducted line-transect distance sampling surveys on 4 occasions per year (early November, mid-December, late January, early March) from a helicopter platform and prescribed the 20% annual bobwhite harvest from the November density estimate. According to our bobwhite density estimates, we found that bobwhite mortality (e.g., population decline) varied seasonally between hunted ( = 54% ± 3%) and nonhunted sites ( = 46% ± 5%). Our spring density estimates on both sites (i.e., hunted vs. nonhunted) were similar through the first 2 years but diverged in 2020–2021, with bobwhite densities that were 129% higher on the nonhunted site. Comparing our annual spring density results to the means reported from population models (i.e., 100-year simulations) used to create the 20% harvest recommendation, we found that the mean spring density of the model simulations was higher than our mean field estimates on both our hunted (+59%) and nonhunted sites (+77%). We recommend a conservative approach to prescribing a bobwhite harvest in South Texas, such as using the lower 95% confidence interval of a bobwhite abundance estimate for calculating harvest prescriptions, due to variability within density estimates and bobwhite survival in semiarid ranges.
评估南德克萨斯州北部山齿鹑的收获率建议
目前北长齿鹑(Colinus virginianus;美国南德克萨斯州的山齿鹑(以下简称山齿鹑)占秋季种群的20%,包括严重的损失。这一建议是基于对经验数据的人口模拟。我们通过比较2018-2019年、2019-2020年和2020-2021年德克萨斯州Jim Hogg县全州山齿鹑狩猎季节在德克萨斯州南部一个狩猎和非狩猎地点的狩猎前和狩猎后的山齿鹑密度估计,完成了对20%收获建议的第一次实地评估。我们在直升机平台上进行了每年4次(11月初、12月中旬、1月下旬、3月初)的样线距离抽样调查,并根据11月份的密度估计确定了每年20%的山齿鹑收获量。根据我们对山齿鹑密度的估计,我们发现山齿鹑的死亡率(例如,数量下降)在狩猎地点(= 54%±3%)和非狩猎地点(= 46%±5%)之间存在季节性差异。我们对两个地点的春季密度估计(即被猎杀与未被猎杀)在前两年相似,但在2020-2021年出现分歧,未被猎杀地点的山齿鹑密度高出129%。将我们的年度春季密度结果与用于创建20%收获建议的种群模型(即100年模拟)报告的平均值进行比较,我们发现,在我们的狩猎地点(+59%)和非狩猎地点(+77%),模型模拟的平均春季密度都高于我们的平均田野估计。我们建议在南德克萨斯州采用保守的方法进行山齿鹑的收获,例如使用山齿鹑丰度估计的较低95%置信区间来计算收获处方,因为密度估计和半干旱地区的山齿鹑存活率存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信