Urban Sustainability versus Green-Washing — Fallacy and Reality of Urban Regeneration in Downtown Seoul

T. Schuetze, L. Chelleri
{"title":"Urban Sustainability versus Green-Washing — Fallacy and Reality of Urban Regeneration in Downtown Seoul","authors":"T. Schuetze, L. Chelleri","doi":"10.3390/SU8010033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the planning paradigm shift related to the contested “urban renaissance” mega-project in Downtown Seoul (Korea). Similar to other global cities, over the last few decades, different mega-projects have been successfully implemented in Seoul. These projects have been considered engines for urban renewals and transformation. This paper builds on the analysis of the failure and re-framing planning strategy for the Green Corridor (GC) mega-project, part of the “Urban Renaissance Master Plan for Downtown Seoul”. The GC case reveals various critical insights for urban sustainability: (i) the current mega-projects’ sustainability fallacy, related to top-down, technocratic densification, and greening practices; and (ii) the untapped potential of Asian traditional and irregular small scale urban patterns, and their related socio-cultural value in addressing the renaissance of the long term urban sustainability. In particular, the discussed research findings point out that urban renaissance enabling sustainability principles requires integrated, small scale, incremental, and adaptive (stepwise) urban planning and design processes that go well beyond general strategies following the so-called “green growth” paradigm.","PeriodicalId":109568,"journal":{"name":"AARN: East Asia (Topic)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: East Asia (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/SU8010033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

This paper examines the planning paradigm shift related to the contested “urban renaissance” mega-project in Downtown Seoul (Korea). Similar to other global cities, over the last few decades, different mega-projects have been successfully implemented in Seoul. These projects have been considered engines for urban renewals and transformation. This paper builds on the analysis of the failure and re-framing planning strategy for the Green Corridor (GC) mega-project, part of the “Urban Renaissance Master Plan for Downtown Seoul”. The GC case reveals various critical insights for urban sustainability: (i) the current mega-projects’ sustainability fallacy, related to top-down, technocratic densification, and greening practices; and (ii) the untapped potential of Asian traditional and irregular small scale urban patterns, and their related socio-cultural value in addressing the renaissance of the long term urban sustainability. In particular, the discussed research findings point out that urban renaissance enabling sustainability principles requires integrated, small scale, incremental, and adaptive (stepwise) urban planning and design processes that go well beyond general strategies following the so-called “green growth” paradigm.
城市可持续性与洗绿——首尔市中心城市再生的谬误与现实
本文研究了与韩国首尔市中心有争议的“城市复兴”大型项目相关的规划范式转变。与其他全球城市类似,在过去的几十年里,首尔成功地实施了不同的大型项目。这些项目被认为是城市更新和改造的引擎。本文分析了“首尔市中心城市复兴总体规划”中绿色走廊(GC)大型项目的失败和重新制定规划策略。GC案例揭示了城市可持续性的各种关键见解:(i)当前大型项目的可持续性谬误,与自上而下、技术官僚化和绿化实践有关;(ii)亚洲传统和不规则的小规模城市模式尚未开发的潜力,以及它们在解决长期城市可持续性复兴方面的相关社会文化价值。特别是,所讨论的研究结果指出,城市复兴实现可持续性原则需要综合的、小规模的、增量的、适应性的(逐步的)城市规划和设计过程,这些过程远远超出了遵循所谓的“绿色增长”范式的一般战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信