Caste, inequality, and poverty in India: a re-assessment

V. Borooah, Dilip G. Diwakar, V. Mishra, A. Naik, N. Sabharwal
{"title":"Caste, inequality, and poverty in India: a re-assessment","authors":"V. Borooah, Dilip G. Diwakar, V. Mishra, A. Naik, N. Sabharwal","doi":"10.1080/21665095.2014.967877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to examine the inequality and poverty issues of rural households in India from the perspective of a household’s monthly per capita consumption expenditure using data on nearly 20,000 households. In examining these issues, the paper first sets out a model of a poverty–inequality trade-off whereby governments could choose the poverty–inequality combination they most preferred. Then the paper proceeds to examine whether there is a ‘caste basis’ to inequality and poverty in India or whether distributional and deprivation outcomes are ‘caste blind’ and entirely determined by the attributes of the individual households. Our overarching conclusion is that households’ outcomes with respect to their position on the distributional ladder, or with respect to their chances of being poor, are dependent in large measure on their caste. So households from the Scheduled Castes were more likely to be in the lowest quintile of consumption, and were more likely to be poor, than high-caste Hindu households.","PeriodicalId":273252,"journal":{"name":"Development Studies Research. An Open Access Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Studies Research. An Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2014.967877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the inequality and poverty issues of rural households in India from the perspective of a household’s monthly per capita consumption expenditure using data on nearly 20,000 households. In examining these issues, the paper first sets out a model of a poverty–inequality trade-off whereby governments could choose the poverty–inequality combination they most preferred. Then the paper proceeds to examine whether there is a ‘caste basis’ to inequality and poverty in India or whether distributional and deprivation outcomes are ‘caste blind’ and entirely determined by the attributes of the individual households. Our overarching conclusion is that households’ outcomes with respect to their position on the distributional ladder, or with respect to their chances of being poor, are dependent in large measure on their caste. So households from the Scheduled Castes were more likely to be in the lowest quintile of consumption, and were more likely to be poor, than high-caste Hindu households.
种姓、不平等和印度的贫困:重新评估
本文的目的是利用近2万个家庭的数据,从一个家庭的月人均消费支出的角度来研究印度农村家庭的不平等和贫困问题。在研究这些问题时,本文首先提出了一个贫困-不平等权衡模型,政府可以从中选择他们最喜欢的贫困-不平等组合。然后,本文继续研究印度的不平等和贫困是否存在“种姓基础”,或者分配和剥夺结果是否“种姓盲”,完全由单个家庭的属性决定。我们的总体结论是,家庭的收入与他们在分配阶梯上的地位有关,或者与他们变穷的可能性有关,在很大程度上取决于他们的种姓。因此,与高种姓的印度家庭相比,来自表列种姓的家庭更有可能处于消费水平最低的五分之一,也更有可能贫穷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信