Analysis of Bibliography on Specific Learning Disability in India

S. Venkatesan
{"title":"Analysis of Bibliography on Specific Learning Disability in India","authors":"S. Venkatesan","doi":"10.5463/DCID.V28I2.540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study attempts a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis of un-annotated bibliographic listing of books and citations compiled on specific learning disability published by researchers in India. Method: An online and offline survey covering ISSN journals and ISBN marked books available in print or electronic media was compiled, coded, categorized, and classified by title, theme, year, journals, and names of author/s. Results: The bibliographic search yielded 450 research articles drawn from 196 national and international journals of Indian origin and 29 book titles on the topic of learning disability and/or its equivalents covering themes related to their nature-characteristic (N: 184; 40.89%), therapy-intervention (N: 115; 25.56%), causes-correlates (N: 57; 12.67%), screening-assessment-identification (N: 52; 11.56 %), and epidemiology-prevalence (N: 42; 9.33%).  A decade wise timeline analysis shows an increasing trend in the quantum of publications on learning disability by almost four times from the base years of <=1990s to the contemporary period, along with corresponding shift in the increased use of the term ‘learning disability’ in preference for other older terms (p:<0.05). Conclusion: On the whole, there seems to be much unused information available about learning disabilities in the country, which now lies widely scattered. Limitations & Recommendation: Although no claim is made that the bibliographic listing is all inclusive, it is recommended that the first step is to have an information gathering mechanism, creation of a dynamic repository, or archival system with retrieval systems in place for prospective researchers on a subject matter of great importance  within the country.","PeriodicalId":179630,"journal":{"name":"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5463/DCID.V28I2.540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: This study attempts a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis of un-annotated bibliographic listing of books and citations compiled on specific learning disability published by researchers in India. Method: An online and offline survey covering ISSN journals and ISBN marked books available in print or electronic media was compiled, coded, categorized, and classified by title, theme, year, journals, and names of author/s. Results: The bibliographic search yielded 450 research articles drawn from 196 national and international journals of Indian origin and 29 book titles on the topic of learning disability and/or its equivalents covering themes related to their nature-characteristic (N: 184; 40.89%), therapy-intervention (N: 115; 25.56%), causes-correlates (N: 57; 12.67%), screening-assessment-identification (N: 52; 11.56 %), and epidemiology-prevalence (N: 42; 9.33%).  A decade wise timeline analysis shows an increasing trend in the quantum of publications on learning disability by almost four times from the base years of <=1990s to the contemporary period, along with corresponding shift in the increased use of the term ‘learning disability’ in preference for other older terms (p:<0.05). Conclusion: On the whole, there seems to be much unused information available about learning disabilities in the country, which now lies widely scattered. Limitations & Recommendation: Although no claim is made that the bibliographic listing is all inclusive, it is recommended that the first step is to have an information gathering mechanism, creation of a dynamic repository, or archival system with retrieval systems in place for prospective researchers on a subject matter of great importance  within the country.
印度特殊学习障碍文献分析
目的:本研究试图对印度研究人员出版的关于特殊学习障碍的无注释书目和引文进行全面的定性和定量分析。方法:通过在线和离线调查,对ISSN期刊和印刷或电子媒体上有ISBN标记的书籍进行汇编、编码、分类,并按标题、主题、年份、期刊和作者姓名进行分类。结果:文献检索产生了450篇研究论文,这些论文来自196个印度裔国家和国际期刊,以及29本关于学习障碍和/或其等同主题的书籍,涵盖了与他们的自然特征相关的主题(N: 184;40.89%),治疗干预(N: 115;25.56%),原因相关(N: 57;12.67%),筛选-评估-鉴定(N: 52;11.56%)和流行病学患病率(N: 42;9.33%)。十年时间线分析显示,从<= 90年代的基准年到当代,关于学习障碍的出版物数量呈增长趋势,几乎增长了四倍,同时“学习障碍”一词的使用也相应增加,而不是其他较早的术语(p:<0.05)。结论:总的来说,这个国家似乎有很多关于学习障碍的未使用的信息,这些信息现在分散在各处。限制和建议:虽然没有声明书目列表是包括所有,但建议第一步是有一个信息收集机制,创建一个动态存储库,或档案系统与检索系统到位,为未来的研究人员在国内非常重要的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信