M. Zamburlini, R. de la Fuente-Fernández, A. Stoessl, T. Ruth, V. Sossi
{"title":"Impact of different realignment algorithms on the SPM analysis of [/sup 11/C]raclopride PET studies","authors":"M. Zamburlini, R. de la Fuente-Fernández, A. Stoessl, T. Ruth, V. Sossi","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2002.1239509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we address the issue of how the preprocessing steps of a typical neuroreceptor PET study may influence the outcome of an SPM analysis examining inter-condition differences. Two preprocessing steps and their possible interaction were investigated: 1) the realignment of dynamic images to correct for patient's motion and 2) the effect of the template in the normalization step required by SPM. Methods: The impact of different realignment algorithms was tested by performing the SPM analysis on a six patient - two conditions /sup 11/C-raclopride (RAC) study where the dynamic images of each subject were re-aligned with four algorithms. Once realigned, the images were normalized to the standard cerebral blood flow (CBF) template. available in SPM, and to a RAC template. The SPM pattern showing the inter-condition differences obtained in each case was compared with the expected one. The accuracy of the four alignment algorithms used was further tested using a set of motion-free RAC studies. Results/Conclusion: We found that 1) different realignment algorithms may create different inter-condition difference patterns, 2) such differences in the results may be due to a failure in accuracy of some realignment algorithms, and 3) the use of a template that closely matches the spatial distribution of the tracer under investigation can minimize these problems.","PeriodicalId":385259,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2002.1239509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In this paper we address the issue of how the preprocessing steps of a typical neuroreceptor PET study may influence the outcome of an SPM analysis examining inter-condition differences. Two preprocessing steps and their possible interaction were investigated: 1) the realignment of dynamic images to correct for patient's motion and 2) the effect of the template in the normalization step required by SPM. Methods: The impact of different realignment algorithms was tested by performing the SPM analysis on a six patient - two conditions /sup 11/C-raclopride (RAC) study where the dynamic images of each subject were re-aligned with four algorithms. Once realigned, the images were normalized to the standard cerebral blood flow (CBF) template. available in SPM, and to a RAC template. The SPM pattern showing the inter-condition differences obtained in each case was compared with the expected one. The accuracy of the four alignment algorithms used was further tested using a set of motion-free RAC studies. Results/Conclusion: We found that 1) different realignment algorithms may create different inter-condition difference patterns, 2) such differences in the results may be due to a failure in accuracy of some realignment algorithms, and 3) the use of a template that closely matches the spatial distribution of the tracer under investigation can minimize these problems.