G. K. Cnesterton as the representative of English Catholic Revival and his attitude to lying

A. Polshchak
{"title":"G. K. Cnesterton as the representative of English Catholic Revival and his attitude to lying","authors":"A. Polshchak","doi":"10.17721/2520-6397.2021.3.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to the issue of lying revealed in works of G. K. Chesterton, first of all in his “Orthodoxy”. This thinker reveals the most serious mistakes in the manner of thinking of his contemporaries, because he sees the danger of deadlock in such scenario of scientific development as well as the threat to ruin the foundation of common sense, reason and mind. Chesterton is one of the most prominent writers of English Catholic Revival style of the first part of the XX century. The activity of representatives of this style is connected with the attempt to answer to the challenges of their time, which have the attitude to appearance and development of new tendencies in philosophy and culture. The representatives of these tendencies rejected Christian manner of viewing a person and the world, the result of which was the anxiety and confusion. These tendencies also implicated the disguised lack of congruence as well as substantial errancy; – the consequence was the ruin of inner world of a person. Chesterton’s “Orthodoxy” is closely connected with his wish to unmask the vices of his time and to communicate his own understanding of the Truth. The writer tells about his own way to find the truth in Christianity and in the same time he reveals the disguised lying. One of his approaches to prove his point of view is to analyze the facts and to do it fairly and in integral way. With this aim he uses the logic, which operates the facts and does it in proper way, considering the true and real facts. This logic has the intention to move ahead and avoid the tendencies to be reframed into the vicious circle. The other important and interesting approach of Chesterton in the course of facts interpretation is rather “illogical” and includes the faith as the ground for the very possibility of thinking, and therefore for the very existence of logic. He states that there is no sense to set a question of choice between the faith and logic, because the very logic is the question of faith – our thoughts have to be admitted as the ones which have the attitude to reality, and this is the matter of faith.","PeriodicalId":443655,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic and Conceptual Views of the World","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic and Conceptual Views of the World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6397.2021.3.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the issue of lying revealed in works of G. K. Chesterton, first of all in his “Orthodoxy”. This thinker reveals the most serious mistakes in the manner of thinking of his contemporaries, because he sees the danger of deadlock in such scenario of scientific development as well as the threat to ruin the foundation of common sense, reason and mind. Chesterton is one of the most prominent writers of English Catholic Revival style of the first part of the XX century. The activity of representatives of this style is connected with the attempt to answer to the challenges of their time, which have the attitude to appearance and development of new tendencies in philosophy and culture. The representatives of these tendencies rejected Christian manner of viewing a person and the world, the result of which was the anxiety and confusion. These tendencies also implicated the disguised lack of congruence as well as substantial errancy; – the consequence was the ruin of inner world of a person. Chesterton’s “Orthodoxy” is closely connected with his wish to unmask the vices of his time and to communicate his own understanding of the Truth. The writer tells about his own way to find the truth in Christianity and in the same time he reveals the disguised lying. One of his approaches to prove his point of view is to analyze the facts and to do it fairly and in integral way. With this aim he uses the logic, which operates the facts and does it in proper way, considering the true and real facts. This logic has the intention to move ahead and avoid the tendencies to be reframed into the vicious circle. The other important and interesting approach of Chesterton in the course of facts interpretation is rather “illogical” and includes the faith as the ground for the very possibility of thinking, and therefore for the very existence of logic. He states that there is no sense to set a question of choice between the faith and logic, because the very logic is the question of faith – our thoughts have to be admitted as the ones which have the attitude to reality, and this is the matter of faith.
英国天主教复兴的代表人物克尼斯特顿及其对谎言的态度
本文旨在探讨切斯特顿作品中所揭示的谎言问题,首先是切斯特顿的《正教》。这位思想家揭示了他同时代人的思维方式中最严重的错误,因为他看到了在科学发展的这种情况下陷入僵局的危险,以及破坏常识、理性和思想基础的威胁。切斯特顿是二十世纪上半叶英国天主教复兴风格最杰出的作家之一。这种风格的代表的活动与试图回答他们时代的挑战有关,这些挑战对哲学和文化的新趋势的出现和发展持态度。这些倾向的代表拒绝基督教看待人和世界的方式,其结果是焦虑和混乱。这些倾向也暗示了伪装的缺乏一致性以及实质性的错误;——结果是一个人内心世界的毁灭。切斯特顿的“正统”与他希望揭露他那个时代的罪恶并传达他自己对真理的理解密切相关。作者讲述了自己在基督教中寻找真理的方式,同时也揭露了伪装的谎言。他证明自己观点的方法之一是对事实进行分析,并公正、完整地进行分析。为了达到这个目的,他使用逻辑,逻辑以正确的方式操作事实,考虑到真实和真实的事实。这种逻辑的意图是向前推进,避免被重新塑造成恶性循环的趋势。切斯特顿在事实解释过程中的另一个重要而有趣的方法是相当“不合逻辑的”,他把信仰作为思考可能性的基础,因此也就是逻辑存在的基础。他说,在信仰和逻辑之间设置一个选择的问题是没有意义的,因为逻辑本身就是信仰的问题——我们的思想必须被承认为对现实有态度的思想,这就是信仰的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信