Intrinsic Motivation, Discrimination and the Child Labor-Schooling Trade-Off: Some Empirical Findings

Bernhard Ganglmair
{"title":"Intrinsic Motivation, Discrimination and the Child Labor-Schooling Trade-Off: Some Empirical Findings","authors":"Bernhard Ganglmair","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.901052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By explicitly taking the interdependence of the decisions over children’s labor and school attendance into account, we jointly estimate a two-equation system applying a bivariate probit model to data from Uganda. We argue that the correlation coecient of the equations’ error terms can be interpreted as the decision trade-o between child labor and schooling, and through a novel methodological approach we obtain evidence for substantial dierences across a number of comparison groups; in particular, we detect a gender, age and relationship bias. We add proxies to control for parental preferences based on self-reported answers from the survey data and find that intrinsic motivation can neither explain the gender nor the age bias implying that parents do not discriminate against their daughters or older children other than for mere economic reasons. The age bias seems mainly driven by cost-related factors and parents’ cost-sensitivity. We do, however, find conclusive evidence for discrimination against children who are not related to the household head, since the observed relationship bias is to some extent driven by parents’ intrinsic motivation.","PeriodicalId":121308,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Employment (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Employment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.901052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

By explicitly taking the interdependence of the decisions over children’s labor and school attendance into account, we jointly estimate a two-equation system applying a bivariate probit model to data from Uganda. We argue that the correlation coecient of the equations’ error terms can be interpreted as the decision trade-o between child labor and schooling, and through a novel methodological approach we obtain evidence for substantial dierences across a number of comparison groups; in particular, we detect a gender, age and relationship bias. We add proxies to control for parental preferences based on self-reported answers from the survey data and find that intrinsic motivation can neither explain the gender nor the age bias implying that parents do not discriminate against their daughters or older children other than for mere economic reasons. The age bias seems mainly driven by cost-related factors and parents’ cost-sensitivity. We do, however, find conclusive evidence for discrimination against children who are not related to the household head, since the observed relationship bias is to some extent driven by parents’ intrinsic motivation.
内在动机、歧视与儿童劳动-学校教育权衡:一些实证研究结果
通过明确地考虑到儿童劳动和上学决策的相互依赖性,我们对乌干达的数据应用双变量probit模型共同估计了一个双方程系统。我们认为,方程误差项的相关系数可以解释为童工和学校教育之间的决策交易,并通过一种新的方法方法,我们获得了许多比较组之间存在实质性差异的证据;特别是,我们发现了性别,年龄和关系的偏见。我们根据调查数据中自我报告的答案添加代理来控制父母的偏好,发现内在动机既不能解释性别偏见,也不能解释年龄偏见,这意味着除了单纯的经济原因,父母不会歧视他们的女儿或更大的孩子。年龄偏见似乎主要由成本相关因素和父母的成本敏感性驱动。然而,我们确实找到了确凿的证据,证明与户主无关的孩子会受到歧视,因为观察到的关系偏见在某种程度上是由父母的内在动机驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信