IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL PROTECTION ON AGRICULTURAL GROWTH IN NIGERIA: POLITICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE (1980-2016)

Ejiofor Emmanuel Omeje, C. Arene, Chiedozie Benjamin Okpukpara
{"title":"IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL PROTECTION ON AGRICULTURAL GROWTH IN NIGERIA: POLITICAL ECONOMY PERSPECTIVE (1980-2016)","authors":"Ejiofor Emmanuel Omeje, C. Arene, Chiedozie Benjamin Okpukpara","doi":"10.15414/RAAE.2019.22.01.41-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the impact of agricultural protection and other macroeconomic variables on agricultural growth in Nigeria from 1980 to 2016. The specific objectives were to (i) estimate the level of agricultural protection in Nigeria; (ii) determine the effects of agricultural protection on agricultural growth, and (iii) analyse the causal relationship between agricultural protection and agricultural growth in Nigeria. The data were obtained from annual time series dataset from Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), World Bank, and Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and were tested using unit root and cointegration tests. Descriptive statistics, Nominal Protection Coefficient (NPC) model, multiple regression and Granger causality were analytical test used, while the hypotheses were tested with F-test. Results revealed a significant presence of protection in the agricultural sector but not statistically commensurate with the share of agriculture to Nigeria's gross domestic product, (GDP). All hypotheses were tested at 1% probability level, i.e. p < 0.01. There was a negative significant relationship between agricultural growth and protection in agriculture. A significant and positive relationship exists between agricultural growth and budgetary appropriation to the agricultural sector, while foreign direct investment and farmers' economic welfare had a non-significant and negative relationship with protection level. There was significant causality running from budgetary appropriation (agriculture) to agricultural protection and from protection level to GDP (agriculture). One of the major recommendations is that government should review its policy instruments, programmes, and projects to ensure that targeted policy objectives such as increase in agricultural growth is achieved by increasing its budget and liberalizing the sector.","PeriodicalId":320413,"journal":{"name":"Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15414/RAAE.2019.22.01.41-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study examined the impact of agricultural protection and other macroeconomic variables on agricultural growth in Nigeria from 1980 to 2016. The specific objectives were to (i) estimate the level of agricultural protection in Nigeria; (ii) determine the effects of agricultural protection on agricultural growth, and (iii) analyse the causal relationship between agricultural protection and agricultural growth in Nigeria. The data were obtained from annual time series dataset from Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), World Bank, and Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and were tested using unit root and cointegration tests. Descriptive statistics, Nominal Protection Coefficient (NPC) model, multiple regression and Granger causality were analytical test used, while the hypotheses were tested with F-test. Results revealed a significant presence of protection in the agricultural sector but not statistically commensurate with the share of agriculture to Nigeria's gross domestic product, (GDP). All hypotheses were tested at 1% probability level, i.e. p < 0.01. There was a negative significant relationship between agricultural growth and protection in agriculture. A significant and positive relationship exists between agricultural growth and budgetary appropriation to the agricultural sector, while foreign direct investment and farmers' economic welfare had a non-significant and negative relationship with protection level. There was significant causality running from budgetary appropriation (agriculture) to agricultural protection and from protection level to GDP (agriculture). One of the major recommendations is that government should review its policy instruments, programmes, and projects to ensure that targeted policy objectives such as increase in agricultural growth is achieved by increasing its budget and liberalizing the sector.
农业保护对尼日利亚农业增长的影响:政治经济学视角(1980-2016)
本研究考察了1980年至2016年尼日利亚农业保护和其他宏观经济变量对农业增长的影响。具体目标是:(i)估计尼日利亚的农业保护水平;(ii)确定农业保护对农业增长的影响,(iii)分析尼日利亚农业保护与农业增长之间的因果关系。数据来自尼日利亚中央银行(CBN)、世界银行和粮食及农业组织(FAO)的年度时间序列数据集,并使用单位根和协整检验进行了检验。采用描述性统计、名义保护系数(NPC)模型、多元回归和格兰杰因果关系进行分析检验,采用f检验对假设进行检验。结果显示,保护措施在农业部门存在,但在统计上与农业在尼日利亚国内生产总值(GDP)中所占的份额不相称。所有假设均以1%概率水平检验,即p < 0.01。农业增长与农业保护呈显著负相关。农业增长与农业部门预算拨款之间存在显著的正相关关系,而外国直接投资和农民经济福利与保护水平之间存在不显著的负相关关系。从预算拨款(农业)到农业保护,从保护水平到国内生产总值(农业),存在显著的因果关系。其中一项主要建议是,政府应审查其政策工具、方案和项目,以确保通过增加预算和放开该部门来实现增加农业增长等有针对性的政策目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信