LOGICAL FALLACIES ON STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING

Leli Lismay
{"title":"LOGICAL FALLACIES ON STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING","authors":"Leli Lismay","doi":"10.36665/elp.v5i2.321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In writing an argumentative paragraph, there will be some fallacies that can be explained as students’ misunderstanding in interpreting source language to target language, in this context English is as a target language. This misunderstanding called logical fallacies where it can broke the meaning in TL. Therefore, the aim of this research was to identify and analyze types of logical fallacies done by the fourth semester students in argumentative writing at English department of IAIN Bukittinggi. The design of this research was descriptive quantitative. The population was the fourth semester students who take writing for professional context subject. The sample was 28 students. The instrument used was documentation of student’s argumentative writing tasks. The result showed that, some informal logical fallacies found in students’ writing. 76%  students wrote inductive fallacy on their writing which means that students drew a conclusion without providing enough evidence on their writing. \n ","PeriodicalId":334664,"journal":{"name":"ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36665/elp.v5i2.321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In writing an argumentative paragraph, there will be some fallacies that can be explained as students’ misunderstanding in interpreting source language to target language, in this context English is as a target language. This misunderstanding called logical fallacies where it can broke the meaning in TL. Therefore, the aim of this research was to identify and analyze types of logical fallacies done by the fourth semester students in argumentative writing at English department of IAIN Bukittinggi. The design of this research was descriptive quantitative. The population was the fourth semester students who take writing for professional context subject. The sample was 28 students. The instrument used was documentation of student’s argumentative writing tasks. The result showed that, some informal logical fallacies found in students’ writing. 76%  students wrote inductive fallacy on their writing which means that students drew a conclusion without providing enough evidence on their writing.  
学生议论文写作中的逻辑谬误
在议论文段的写作中,会出现一些谬误,这些谬误可以解释为学生在将源语解释为目的语时的误解,在这种情况下,英语是作为目的语的。这种误解被称为逻辑谬误,它可以破坏TL的意义。因此,本研究的目的是识别和分析IAIN Bukittinggi英语系第四学期学生在议论文写作中所做的逻辑谬误类型。本研究采用描述性定量设计。研究对象是参加专业语境写作课程的第四学期学生。样本是28名学生。使用的工具是记录学生的议论文写作任务。结果表明,学生在写作中存在一些非正式逻辑谬误。76%的学生在他们的写作中写归纳谬误,这意味着学生在没有提供足够的证据的情况下得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信