Methodological problems of studying the living standard and life quality in international practice

E. Nikitskaya, M. Valishvili, L. Ivanova-Shvets
{"title":"Methodological problems of studying the living standard and life quality in international practice","authors":"E. Nikitskaya, M. Valishvili, L. Ivanova-Shvets","doi":"10.56199/dpcsebm.vihm7625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of living conditions and welfare of the population in modern conditions is associated with the categories of “life quality”, “working life quality”, “living standard”. In the course of the study, it was found that these concepts still do not have a generally accepted interpretation, and their interpretations are subjective-objective. Consequently, there is an inconsistency in experts’ positions on the system of quantitative and qualitative parameters and methods of assessment corresponding to each of the categories. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that the essence of the concept of life quality is much broader than the concept of living standard and goes beyond the minimum essential needs of society. The article summarizes the conceptual and methodological approaches to assessing life quality. The study revealed that the information sources for implementing the objective approach are indicators published by statistical authorities, while the subjective approach is based on expert evaluations, public opinion polls, social ratings. The authors present an analytical review, confirming the need for further scientific research in assessing the level and quality of life, aimed at eliminating the methodological differences in the interpretation of their essence and content.","PeriodicalId":281515,"journal":{"name":"Human resource management within the framework of realisation of national development goals and strategic objectives","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human resource management within the framework of realisation of national development goals and strategic objectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56199/dpcsebm.vihm7625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment of living conditions and welfare of the population in modern conditions is associated with the categories of “life quality”, “working life quality”, “living standard”. In the course of the study, it was found that these concepts still do not have a generally accepted interpretation, and their interpretations are subjective-objective. Consequently, there is an inconsistency in experts’ positions on the system of quantitative and qualitative parameters and methods of assessment corresponding to each of the categories. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that the essence of the concept of life quality is much broader than the concept of living standard and goes beyond the minimum essential needs of society. The article summarizes the conceptual and methodological approaches to assessing life quality. The study revealed that the information sources for implementing the objective approach are indicators published by statistical authorities, while the subjective approach is based on expert evaluations, public opinion polls, social ratings. The authors present an analytical review, confirming the need for further scientific research in assessing the level and quality of life, aimed at eliminating the methodological differences in the interpretation of their essence and content.
生活水平与生活质量研究在国际实践中的方法论问题
对现代条件下人口的生活条件和福利的评估与“生活质量”、“工作生活质量”、“生活水平”等类别有关。在研究过程中发现,这些概念仍然没有一个普遍接受的解释,它们的解释是主观客观的。因此,专家们对每个类别对应的定量和定性参数体系和评估方法的立场不一致。然而,毫无疑问,生活质量概念的本质比生活水平的概念要广泛得多,而且超出了社会的最低基本需要。本文总结了评估生活质量的概念和方法方法。研究表明,实施客观方法的信息来源是统计当局公布的指标,而主观方法是基于专家评价、民意调查、社会评级。作者提出了一项分析性审查,确认在评估生活水平和质量方面需要进一步的科学研究,目的是消除在解释其本质和内容方面的方法差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信