Cross-Polarization Components in Inter-Antenna Coupling Calculations

A. Bhattacharyya, S. Kubina
{"title":"Cross-Polarization Components in Inter-Antenna Coupling Calculations","authors":"A. Bhattacharyya, S. Kubina","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.1986.7568236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the coand cross-polar char­ acteristics of antennas on the surface of a cylinder when the transmitting antenna and the observer are arbitrarily positioned. The theory is based on the analytical approach used by Pathak and Wang for the fields of a source radiating on a convex surface. It takes care of torsion. There is a different cross-polarization effect when both the transmitting and the receiving antennas are in the equatorial planes. The cross-polarized components E and E z f p p f z are not zeros even in the equatorial planes. The cross-polarized ratios have been computed and their variations with different parameters are presented. Introduction In EMC problems of antennas on complex structures, existing inter-antenna coupling programs such as IEMCAP [1] and AAPG [2] do not calculate the cross­ polarized components. In intra-system problems in­ volving high power levels for emitters and highly sensitive receivers, these components become important to consider. It has been found that not only is the actual coupling path of importance, but also its conse­ quence in the generation of cross-polarized field components along its trajectory. A close examination of the analytical approach of Pathak and Wang [3] is made for the case of antennas on cylindrical structures. Although this theory can predict the coand crosspolar components, some inconsistencies in the results are noted which deserve closer examination. Theory The surface electric and magnetic fields dfl̂ and dE due to a magnetic dipole moment dpm on a convex surface whose one radius of curvature is large compared to the other are given by [3], dHm (Q/Q') = ^ d p m (Q'){2Y0 (b'b[(l 4 ) V.CQ +D2 ( i ) 2(As U K ) + Ac V(?) + ^ T 02 (UK) VK))] + t’t[D2 + jL U K ) 2 (i-)2 (ASU K ) + Ac VK))] + (t'b + b't)[^-T0 (UK) VK))]} • D Gg(kt) and (1) dEJQ/Q’) = ^ d p m (Q'){2(b'n[(ljL) V(C) + v & ' ^ c? ))] + [T0 i t \" V (C )D } • D G0 (kt) (2) Similarity, the surface fields dHg and dEe on an arbitrary convex surface are given by dEe (Q/Q!) = ^ d p e (Q,){2Z0n ,n [ V © jL V(?) + 4 ) 2 (As V K ) + AC -UK)) + T02 i (UK) VK)]}D Gg (kt) and (3) dHe (Q/Q’) = tie(.Q'){2(n'b[(l i ) V K ) + Tq2 4 (UK) VK))] + n't [T0 £ (UK) VK))]} • D GQ(kt) (4) where Yg is the intrinsic impedance of the medium in which the structure is immersed; t = /az (cf>2-(l>2.)2+ (z2_zl)2 ’ the torsion factor T„ = Cot 6, where 6 is the angle of entry with the 1/3 cylinder axis; m = (k pg/2) ; £ = mt/pg ; Pg = a/Sin2 5; Ac is a blending function equal to unity for a cylinder. Expression for the Case of a Cylinder For the case of the cylinder with arbitrary posi­ tions of transmitting and receiving antennas, let (a,<f>' ,z') and (a,<f>,z) be the coordinates of transmit­ ting and receiving points. Then t and £ are given by t =v42 (<)>2 \"<l>j ) 2 + Cz 2 \"z l } 2 ? =>/a2 (<J>2 _<f>1 ) 2 + (z 2 \"zl ^ 2 * the angle of entry 6 with cylinder axis is given by tan 6 = a(d>2_<t>1)/(z2_zi^ and the torsion factor Tg = Cot o . With a little algebra, the different coand cross-polarized components as obtained from (1)-(4) are given by Hzi' \" ’ [(1‘ VtE) * * V i m o v ( o ) i s E t i i s i Kt / t V ' < l v® * 2 CH2294-7/86/000-0184 $01.00©1986 IEEE 184 SESSION 3B Si V z dPm * 0 W Ez'p = # dPm w id v® + V k w n exp(-jkt) St and E , . = TOdPm ( U © V K ) j S 2 t M P P 4irt S i Due to Electric Dipole Moment V = # dpe {v® i t ' + 4 ^ 2 u® + T02 i i C U(0 V(?)> g g L i M /t Hp'z = # dPe {(1 ♦ T0 4 {U(0 V(C))} exp(-jkt) Si and HP> = T~0 i t dPe {u^ VCC)} ^ 2 ^ 1 By reciprocity, u , = u , , u ., = u , , and so on. ' * ' ’ pp' p’p ’ p<j>' p ’<j> Discussions and Conclusions The coand cross-polar electric and magnetic components have been computed for several cases of transmitting and receiving antennas on a cylindrical structure with different parameters. The computations were repeated for transmitting and receiving positions in different z-constant planes and in the same plane. Some of the results showing the decay of coand crosspolarized components are presented in Figs. 2 and 3. The transmitting dipole moment is equal to unity and the receiving antenna is a point source in the compu­ tations. It is found that the cross-polar components Ep<j>' *■311(1 Ep'<p’ H<f>'z 3̂11(1 V are m°re weak than the co-polar components H . (and H . ) and H. ,, (and Z Z Z ( Dy H^,^) while Hz,p is not. In the equatorial plane case, the cross-polar components H^,z, E^)p and do not get excited but E , and H , are not predicted z'p p z r to assume zero values. This aspect requires further investigations. Tables 1(a) to (c) give the relative values of shading loss of coand cross-polar compon­ ents for the same path length for equatorial and arbitrary positions. It is found that the coand cross-polar components differ in intensity consider­ ably for the same path length in equatorial and non-equatorial cases particularly for smaller radii of curvature of the cylinder. This is because even though the path length is the same for the non-equatorial case the effective radius of curvature depends on the angle of entry. Also, the above analytical model is accurate for large values of radius of curvature of the surface. 1RS References [1] J.L. Bogdanor, R.A. Pearlman, and M.D. Siegel, Intrasystem Electromagnetic Compatibility Analy­ sis Program. Vol. I, User’s Manual, Usage Section, AD A-008-527, December 1974; User's Manual, Engineering Section, AD A009-52b, December 1974, NTIS, U.S. Dept, of Commerce, Springfield, VA. [2] Hans Peter Widmer, A Technical Description of the AAPG Program. Report ECAC-CR-83-048, November [3] P.H. Pathak and Nang Wang, \"Ray Analysis of Mutual Coupling between Antennas on a Convex Surface\", IEEE Trans. Vol. AP-29, No. 6, September 1981, pp. 911-922.","PeriodicalId":244612,"journal":{"name":"1986 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":"31 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1986 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1986.7568236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the coand cross-polar char­ acteristics of antennas on the surface of a cylinder when the transmitting antenna and the observer are arbitrarily positioned. The theory is based on the analytical approach used by Pathak and Wang for the fields of a source radiating on a convex surface. It takes care of torsion. There is a different cross-polarization effect when both the transmitting and the receiving antennas are in the equatorial planes. The cross-polarized components E and E z f p p f z are not zeros even in the equatorial planes. The cross-polarized ratios have been computed and their variations with different parameters are presented. Introduction In EMC problems of antennas on complex structures, existing inter-antenna coupling programs such as IEMCAP [1] and AAPG [2] do not calculate the cross­ polarized components. In intra-system problems in­ volving high power levels for emitters and highly sensitive receivers, these components become important to consider. It has been found that not only is the actual coupling path of importance, but also its conse­ quence in the generation of cross-polarized field components along its trajectory. A close examination of the analytical approach of Pathak and Wang [3] is made for the case of antennas on cylindrical structures. Although this theory can predict the coand crosspolar components, some inconsistencies in the results are noted which deserve closer examination. Theory The surface electric and magnetic fields dfl̂ and dE due to a magnetic dipole moment dpm on a convex surface whose one radius of curvature is large compared to the other are given by [3], dHm (Q/Q') = ^ d p m (Q'){2Y0 (b'b[(l 4 ) V.CQ +D2 ( i ) 2(As U K ) + Ac V(?) + ^ T 02 (UK) VK))] + t’t[D2 + jL U K ) 2 (i-)2 (ASU K ) + Ac VK))] + (t'b + b't)[^-T0 (UK) VK))]} • D Gg(kt) and (1) dEJQ/Q’) = ^ d p m (Q'){2(b'n[(ljL) V(C) + v & ' ^ c? ))] + [T0 i t " V (C )D } • D G0 (kt) (2) Similarity, the surface fields dHg and dEe on an arbitrary convex surface are given by dEe (Q/Q!) = ^ d p e (Q,){2Z0n ,n [ V © jL V(?) + 4 ) 2 (As V K ) + AC -UK)) + T02 i (UK) VK)]}D Gg (kt) and (3) dHe (Q/Q’) = tie(.Q'){2(n'b[(l i ) V K ) + Tq2 4 (UK) VK))] + n't [T0 £ (UK) VK))]} • D GQ(kt) (4) where Yg is the intrinsic impedance of the medium in which the structure is immersed; t = /az (cf>2-(l>2.)2+ (z2_zl)2 ’ the torsion factor T„ = Cot 6, where 6 is the angle of entry with the 1/3 cylinder axis; m = (k pg/2) ; £ = mt/pg ; Pg = a/Sin2 5; Ac is a blending function equal to unity for a cylinder. Expression for the Case of a Cylinder For the case of the cylinder with arbitrary posi­ tions of transmitting and receiving antennas, let (a,' ,z') and (a,,z) be the coordinates of transmit­ ting and receiving points. Then t and £ are given by t =v42 (<)>2 "j ) 2 + Cz 2 "z l } 2 ? =>/a2 (2 _1 ) 2 + (z 2 "zl ^ 2 * the angle of entry 6 with cylinder axis is given by tan 6 = a(d>2_1)/(z2_zi^ and the torsion factor Tg = Cot o . With a little algebra, the different coand cross-polarized components as obtained from (1)-(4) are given by Hzi' " ’ [(1‘ VtE) * * V i m o v ( o ) i s E t i i s i Kt / t V ' < l v® * 2 CH2294-7/86/000-0184 $01.00©1986 IEEE 184 SESSION 3B Si V z dPm * 0 W Ez'p = # dPm w id v® + V k w n exp(-jkt) St and E , . = TOdPm ( U © V K ) j S 2 t M P P 4irt S i Due to Electric Dipole Moment V = # dpe {v® i t ' + 4 ^ 2 u® + T02 i i C U(0 V(?)> g g L i M /t Hp'z = # dPe {(1 ♦ T0 4 {U(0 V(C))} exp(-jkt) Si and HP> = T~0 i t dPe {u^ VCC)} ^ 2 ^ 1 By reciprocity, u , = u , , u ., = u , , and so on. ' * ' ’ pp' p’p ’ p' p ’ Discussions and Conclusions The coand cross-polar electric and magnetic components have been computed for several cases of transmitting and receiving antennas on a cylindrical structure with different parameters. The computations were repeated for transmitting and receiving positions in different z-constant planes and in the same plane. Some of the results showing the decay of coand crosspolarized components are presented in Figs. 2 and 3. The transmitting dipole moment is equal to unity and the receiving antenna is a point source in the compu­ tations. It is found that the cross-polar components Ep' *■311(1 Ep''z 3̂11(1 V are m°re weak than the co-polar components H . (and H . ) and H. ,, (and Z Z Z ( Dy H^,^) while Hz,p is not. In the equatorial plane case, the cross-polar components H^,z, E^)p and do not get excited but E , and H , are not predicted z'p p z r to assume zero values. This aspect requires further investigations. Tables 1(a) to (c) give the relative values of shading loss of coand cross-polar compon­ ents for the same path length for equatorial and arbitrary positions. It is found that the coand cross-polar components differ in intensity consider­ ably for the same path length in equatorial and non-equatorial cases particularly for smaller radii of curvature of the cylinder. This is because even though the path length is the same for the non-equatorial case the effective radius of curvature depends on the angle of entry. Also, the above analytical model is accurate for large values of radius of curvature of the surface. 1RS References [1] J.L. Bogdanor, R.A. Pearlman, and M.D. Siegel, Intrasystem Electromagnetic Compatibility Analy­ sis Program. Vol. I, User’s Manual, Usage Section, AD A-008-527, December 1974; User's Manual, Engineering Section, AD A009-52b, December 1974, NTIS, U.S. Dept, of Commerce, Springfield, VA. [2] Hans Peter Widmer, A Technical Description of the AAPG Program. Report ECAC-CR-83-048, November [3] P.H. Pathak and Nang Wang, "Ray Analysis of Mutual Coupling between Antennas on a Convex Surface", IEEE Trans. Vol. AP-29, No. 6, September 1981, pp. 911-922.
天线间耦合计算中的交叉极化分量
本文研究了任意定位发射天线和观测器时圆柱体表面天线的正交特性。该理论是基于Pathak和Wang对辐射在凸表面上的源的场所使用的分析方法。它负责扭转。当发射天线和接收天线均位于赤道平面时,交叉极化效应不同。交叉极化分量E和ezf p p f z即使在赤道面上也不为零。计算了交叉极化比,并给出了它们随不同参数的变化规律。在复杂结构上天线的电磁兼容问题中,现有的天线间耦合程序如IEMCAP[1]和AAPG[2]没有计算交叉极化分量。在涉及发射器和高灵敏度接收器的高功率电平的系统内问题中,这些元件变得非常重要。研究发现,不仅实际耦合路径很重要,而且其结果在沿其轨迹产生的交叉极化场分量中也很重要。对于圆柱形结构上的天线,对Pathak和Wang[3]的分析方法进行了仔细的检查。虽然这一理论可以预测共极和交叉极分量,但结果中存在一些不一致之处,值得进一步研究。表面电场和磁场理论阐述̂和德由于磁偶极矩dpm在一个凸表面的曲率半径大而另一个是由[3],dHm (Q / Q ') = ^ d p m (Q) {2 y0 (b ' b [(l 4) V.CQ + D2 (i) 2 (U K) + Ac V (?) + ^ T 02(英国)VK))) + T不[D2 + jL U K) 2(我)2 (ASU K) + Ac VK)) + (T ' b + b) [^ t0(英国)VK)]}•d Gg (kt)和(1)dEJQ / Q ') = ^ d p m (Q) {2 (b’((ljL) V (C) + & ^ C ?))] + [T0我t V (C) D}•D G0 (kt)(2)相似,表面字段dHg和迪任意凸表面上是由迪(Q / Q !) = ^ D p e (Q) {2 z0n n [V©jL V(?) + 4)肥2 V (K) + AC) +我(英国)VK T02)]} D Gg (kt)和(3)她(Q / Q ') =领带(Q) {2 (n ' b [V (l i) K) + 4(英国)Tq2 VK))) + n不(T0£(英国)VK)]}•D GQ (kt) (4) Yg的固有阻抗的介质结构浸;t = /az (cf>2-(l>2)2+ (z2_zl)2 '扭转系数t ' = Cot 6,其中6为进入与1/3圆柱轴的夹角;M = (k pg/2);£= mt/pg;Pg = a/Sin2 5;Ac是一个混合函数,对于圆柱体等于单位。对于发射天线和接收天线位置任意的圆柱体,设(a,',z')和(a,,z)分别为发射点和接收点的坐标。那么t和£由t =v42 (2 ' j) 2 + Cz 2 ' z 1} 2 ?=>/a2 (2_1) 2 + (z2”zl ^ 2 *进入6与圆柱轴的角度由tan 6 = a(d>2_1)/(z2_zi^)和扭转系数Tg = Cot 0给出。小代数,不同coand正交极化组件从(1)——(4)给出Hzi”的[(1的静脉血栓栓塞)* * V i m o (o)我我年代Kt s E t / t V ' < l V®* 2 ch2294 - 7/86/000 - 0184 01.00美元©1986年IEEE 184会话3 b如果V z dPm * 0 W Ez 'p = # dPm W id V®V + k W n exp (-jkt)圣和E。U©V = TOdPm (K) j 2 t M P P 4红外热成像年代我由于电偶极矩V = # dpe{®i t ' + 4 ^ 2 U®+ T02我C U (0 V (?) > g g L i M / t惠普'z = # dpe{(1♦T0 4 U (0 V (C)) {} exp (-jkt) Si和惠普> = t ~ 0我dpe {U ^ VCC)} ^ 2 ^ 1通过互惠,U = U, U, = U,等等。讨论与结论计算了几种不同参数圆柱形结构上发射和接收天线的共极性和交极性的电、磁分量。在不同的z常数平面和同一平面上重复计算发射和接收位置。图2和图3给出了一些显示共极化和交叉极化分量衰减的结果。在计算中,发射偶极矩等于单位,接收天线为点源。发现交叉极性分量Ep′*■311(1 Ep′z 3′11(1 V)比共极性分量H弱。(和H .)H,,(和zzz Z (Dy H^,^)而Hz,p不是。在赤道平面的情况下,交叉极性分量,H^ z, E^)p,不会被激发但是E和H,不会被预测为z'p p z r为零。这方面需要进一步调查。表1(a)至(c)给出了赤道和任意位置相同路径长度下正极分量和交叉极分量遮阳损失的相对值。发现在赤道和非赤道情况下,对于相同的路径长度,特别是在圆柱曲率半径较小的情况下,正极性和交叉极性分量的强度有很大的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信