Employee Relations in Context: Globalization, Uncertainties, and Dynamics of Change

Aurora Trif, V. Paolucci
{"title":"Employee Relations in Context: Globalization, Uncertainties, and Dynamics of Change","authors":"Aurora Trif, V. Paolucci","doi":"10.4337/9781788973229.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globalization, which refers to the process of increased integration between countries, has had \nsignificant effects on employee relations (Lansbury, 2018). Economic liberalism, a key feature of \nglobalization, has fostered individualism and competition since the 1980s, hindering collective \nmechanisms aimed at limiting ‘a race to the bottom’ in labour standards in many countries \n(Doellgast et al., 2018). Despite being one of the causes of the 2008 financial crisis, the neo-liberal \npolitical discourse has become, over the past decade, a one-size fits-all recipe for structural reforms \nwith the blessing of international bodies, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the \nWorld Bank and the European Union (EU). In the EU, most governments have sought to reduce \nunemployment and/or contain labour costs primarily by weakening the role of statutory and/or \ncollective bargaining regulations in setting labour standards (Koukiadaki et al., 2016; Marginson, \n2015). Thus, economic liberalism during the crisis has reduced the role of institutional mechanisms \n(e.g. collective bargaining and labour laws) and increased the role of market forces in the \nregulation of employee relations.","PeriodicalId":174528,"journal":{"name":"International Comparative Employee Relations","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Comparative Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973229.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Globalization, which refers to the process of increased integration between countries, has had significant effects on employee relations (Lansbury, 2018). Economic liberalism, a key feature of globalization, has fostered individualism and competition since the 1980s, hindering collective mechanisms aimed at limiting ‘a race to the bottom’ in labour standards in many countries (Doellgast et al., 2018). Despite being one of the causes of the 2008 financial crisis, the neo-liberal political discourse has become, over the past decade, a one-size fits-all recipe for structural reforms with the blessing of international bodies, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and the European Union (EU). In the EU, most governments have sought to reduce unemployment and/or contain labour costs primarily by weakening the role of statutory and/or collective bargaining regulations in setting labour standards (Koukiadaki et al., 2016; Marginson, 2015). Thus, economic liberalism during the crisis has reduced the role of institutional mechanisms (e.g. collective bargaining and labour laws) and increased the role of market forces in the regulation of employee relations.
背景下的员工关系:全球化、不确定性和动态变化
全球化是指国家之间日益一体化的过程,对员工关系产生了重大影响(Lansbury, 2018)。经济自由主义是全球化的一个关键特征,自20世纪80年代以来,它促进了个人主义和竞争,阻碍了旨在限制许多国家劳动标准“竞相降低”的集体机制(Doellgast等人,2018)。尽管新自由主义政治话语是2008年金融危机的原因之一,但在过去十年中,在国际货币基金组织(IMF)、世界银行(World Bank)和欧盟(EU)等国际机构的支持下,新自由主义政治话语已成为一种一刀切的结构改革配方。在欧盟,大多数政府试图减少失业和/或控制劳动力成本,主要是通过削弱法定和/或集体谈判规定在制定劳工标准方面的作用(Koukiadaki等人,2016;Marginson, 2015)。因此,危机期间的经济自由主义减少了体制机制(例如集体谈判和劳工法)的作用,增加了市场力量在调节雇员关系方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信