Rates of return and alternative measures of capital input: 14 countries and 10 branches, 1971-2005

N. Oulton, Ana Rincón-Aznar
{"title":"Rates of return and alternative measures of capital input: 14 countries and 10 branches, 1971-2005","authors":"N. Oulton, Ana Rincón-Aznar","doi":"10.4337/9780857932105.00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We employ the EU KLEMS database to estimate the real rate of return to capital in 14 countries (11 in the EU, three outside the EU) in 10 branches of the market economy plus the market economy as a whole. Our measure of capital is an aggregate over seven types of asset: three ICT assets (computers, communications equipment, and software) and four non-ICT assets (machinery and equipment, nonresidential structures, transport equipment, and other). The real rate of return in the market economy does not vary very much across countries, with the exception of Spain where it is exceptionally high and in Italy where it is exceptionally low. The real rate appears to be trendless in most countries. Within each country however, the rate varies widely across the 10 branches, often being implausibly high or low. We also estimate the growth of capital services by two different methods: ex-post and exante, and the contribution of capital to output growth by three methods: ex-post, ex-ante and hybrid. Our implementation of the ex-ante method uses an estimate of the required rate of return for each country instead of the actual, average rate of return to calculate user costs and also employs the expected growth of asset prices rather than the actual growth. These estimates are derived from exactly the same data as for the ex-post method, ie without any extraneous data being employed. For estimating the contribution of capital to output growth, the ex-ante method uses ex-ante profit as the weight, while both the ex-post and the hybrid method use ex-post profit. We find that the three methods produce very similar results at the market economy level. But differences are much larger at the branch level, particularly between the ex-post and ex-ante methods.","PeriodicalId":359449,"journal":{"name":"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932105.00019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

We employ the EU KLEMS database to estimate the real rate of return to capital in 14 countries (11 in the EU, three outside the EU) in 10 branches of the market economy plus the market economy as a whole. Our measure of capital is an aggregate over seven types of asset: three ICT assets (computers, communications equipment, and software) and four non-ICT assets (machinery and equipment, nonresidential structures, transport equipment, and other). The real rate of return in the market economy does not vary very much across countries, with the exception of Spain where it is exceptionally high and in Italy where it is exceptionally low. The real rate appears to be trendless in most countries. Within each country however, the rate varies widely across the 10 branches, often being implausibly high or low. We also estimate the growth of capital services by two different methods: ex-post and exante, and the contribution of capital to output growth by three methods: ex-post, ex-ante and hybrid. Our implementation of the ex-ante method uses an estimate of the required rate of return for each country instead of the actual, average rate of return to calculate user costs and also employs the expected growth of asset prices rather than the actual growth. These estimates are derived from exactly the same data as for the ex-post method, ie without any extraneous data being employed. For estimating the contribution of capital to output growth, the ex-ante method uses ex-ante profit as the weight, while both the ex-post and the hybrid method use ex-post profit. We find that the three methods produce very similar results at the market economy level. But differences are much larger at the branch level, particularly between the ex-post and ex-ante methods.
资本投入的回报率和替代措施:1971-2005年,14个国家和10个分支机构
我们使用欧盟KLEMS数据库来估计14个国家(11个欧盟国家,3个欧盟以外国家)的10个市场经济部门和整个市场经济的实际资本回报率。我们对资本的衡量是七种资产的总和:三种信息通信技术资产(计算机、通信设备和软件)和四种非信息通信技术资产(机器和设备、非住宅结构、运输设备和其他)。市场经济中的实际回报率在各国之间差别不大,只有西班牙的回报率异常高,而意大利的回报率异常低。在大多数国家,实际汇率似乎是没有趋势的。然而,在每个国家内部,10个分支机构之间的税率差异很大,往往高得令人难以置信,或低得令人难以置信。我们还用事后和事前两种不同的方法来估计资本服务业的增长,用事后、事前和混合三种方法来估计资本对产出增长的贡献。我们对事前法的实施使用了对每个国家所需收益率的估计,而不是实际的平均收益率来计算用户成本,并且还使用了资产价格的预期增长而不是实际增长。这些估计数是根据与事后方法完全相同的数据得出的,即没有使用任何额外的数据。在估算资本对产出增长的贡献时,事前法以事前利润为权重,事后法和混合法均以事后利润为权重。我们发现,在市场经济水平上,这三种方法产生的结果非常相似。但是,在分支机构一级,特别是事后和事前方法之间的差异要大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信