AN ANALYSIS OF BALANCED SCORECARD AS TOOL OF MEASUREMENT PERFORMANCE AT THE BANK OF BENGKULU

Nadia Sigiro
{"title":"AN ANALYSIS OF BALANCED SCORECARD AS TOOL OF MEASUREMENT PERFORMANCE AT THE BANK OF BENGKULU","authors":"Nadia Sigiro","doi":"10.33369/INSIGHT.13.1.15-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose in this research was one effort to help the perpetratorts business in asses the performance of the company (banking). Which is to know how the performance of PT.Bank of Bengkulu in the period 2013-2015 years, if viewd with the Balanced Scorecard approach. Based on the result measured performance used Balanced Scorecard method in Pt.Bank of Bengkulu viewed from the fourth perspective there were : 1. Perspective finance result of ratio ROA 2013 year amount 4,51%, 2014 year amount 3,69% and 2015 year amount 3,29% this can be said healthy. The result ratio BOPO 2013 year amount 526,35%, 2014 year amount 571,62% and 2015 year amount 593,99% this can be said unhealthy. The result ratio LDR 2013 year amount 104,05%, 2014 year amount 85,79% and 2015 year amount 91,05% this can be said healthy. 2. Customer perspective, the result from satisfaction of customer can be categorized satisfied at frequent 3,41-4,20 intervals. 3. Business perspective interval, the result from ratio AETR 2013 year amount 0,06% this can be said not good. 4. Perspective learning and growth, the result from productifitas employee 2013 year amount 19,81%, 2014 year amount 20,73% this can be said good. 2015 year amount 16,09% this can be said not good. Employee coaching 2013 year amount 0% this can be said not good, 2014 year amount 6,44% and 2015 year amount 16,09% this said good.Keyword: Performance, Balanced Scorecard, Bengkulu Banking","PeriodicalId":308880,"journal":{"name":"Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managament Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33369/INSIGHT.13.1.15-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose in this research was one effort to help the perpetratorts business in asses the performance of the company (banking). Which is to know how the performance of PT.Bank of Bengkulu in the period 2013-2015 years, if viewd with the Balanced Scorecard approach. Based on the result measured performance used Balanced Scorecard method in Pt.Bank of Bengkulu viewed from the fourth perspective there were : 1. Perspective finance result of ratio ROA 2013 year amount 4,51%, 2014 year amount 3,69% and 2015 year amount 3,29% this can be said healthy. The result ratio BOPO 2013 year amount 526,35%, 2014 year amount 571,62% and 2015 year amount 593,99% this can be said unhealthy. The result ratio LDR 2013 year amount 104,05%, 2014 year amount 85,79% and 2015 year amount 91,05% this can be said healthy. 2. Customer perspective, the result from satisfaction of customer can be categorized satisfied at frequent 3,41-4,20 intervals. 3. Business perspective interval, the result from ratio AETR 2013 year amount 0,06% this can be said not good. 4. Perspective learning and growth, the result from productifitas employee 2013 year amount 19,81%, 2014 year amount 20,73% this can be said good. 2015 year amount 16,09% this can be said not good. Employee coaching 2013 year amount 0% this can be said not good, 2014 year amount 6,44% and 2015 year amount 16,09% this said good.Keyword: Performance, Balanced Scorecard, Bengkulu Banking
平衡计分卡作为明库鲁银行绩效衡量工具的分析
本研究的目的是为了帮助犯罪者的业务评估公司(银行)的绩效。也就是用平衡计分卡的方法来了解PT.Bank of Bengkulu在2013-2015年期间的表现。根据平衡计分卡法在Pt.Bank of Bengkulu的绩效测量结果,从第四个角度来看:1。从比率ROA来看,2013年金额4.51%、2014年金额3.69%和2015年金额3.29%的财务业绩可以说是健康的。结果比BOPO 2013年为526,35%,2014年为571,62%,2015年为593,99%,这可以说是不健康的。结果比LDR 2013年为104.05%,2014年为85.79%,2015年为91.05%,可以说是健康的。2. 从顾客的角度来看,顾客满意度的结果可以分为满意频次3,41-4,20个区间。3.从业务区间来看,结果从AETR 2013年的比率为0.06%这可以说不太好。4. 从学习和成长的角度来看,productifitas员工2013年的成绩为19.81%,2014年的成绩为20.73%,这可以说是不错的。2015年全年的金额为16,09%,这可以说不太好。员工培训2013年的数量为0%,这可以说是不好的,2014年的数量为6.44%,2015年的数量为16.09%,这可以说是好的。关键词:绩效,平衡计分卡,明库鲁银行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书