Eliciting Veracity Differences Through a General Memory Recall Test

{"title":"Eliciting Veracity Differences Through a General Memory Recall Test","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/ijfr.04.01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A preferred strategy amongst lie tellers is to keep their stories simple. In the present experiment we examined a possible way lie tellers could use to achieve this: Pretending to have a general poor memory. We gave participants the opportunity to reveal this poor memory in a general memory recall test. Participants first saw a video-recorded secret meeting and were led to believe that they would be interviewed about this video. Participants were instructed to recall it either truthfully [truth tellers] or deliberately distort some facts [lie tellers] and were given time to prepare themselves for the forthcoming interview. In the interview we showed participants a video [labelled tricks video] to test their general memory. We asked them to report this tricks video in as much detail and as accurately as possible. We finished the interview after this recall and never asked them to recall the secret meeting video. Half of the participants were asked to sketch while recalling the tricks video. Sketching is known to facilitate recall. As predicted, those who thought they had to lie about the secret meeting video performed worse in recalling the tricks video than those who thought they had to tell the truth about the secret meeting video, particularly in the sketching condition.","PeriodicalId":309861,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forensic Research","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forensic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/ijfr.04.01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A preferred strategy amongst lie tellers is to keep their stories simple. In the present experiment we examined a possible way lie tellers could use to achieve this: Pretending to have a general poor memory. We gave participants the opportunity to reveal this poor memory in a general memory recall test. Participants first saw a video-recorded secret meeting and were led to believe that they would be interviewed about this video. Participants were instructed to recall it either truthfully [truth tellers] or deliberately distort some facts [lie tellers] and were given time to prepare themselves for the forthcoming interview. In the interview we showed participants a video [labelled tricks video] to test their general memory. We asked them to report this tricks video in as much detail and as accurately as possible. We finished the interview after this recall and never asked them to recall the secret meeting video. Half of the participants were asked to sketch while recalling the tricks video. Sketching is known to facilitate recall. As predicted, those who thought they had to lie about the secret meeting video performed worse in recalling the tricks video than those who thought they had to tell the truth about the secret meeting video, particularly in the sketching condition.
通过一般记忆回忆测试得出准确性差异
说谎者的首选策略是让他们的故事简单。在目前的实验中,我们研究了说谎者可能使用的一种方法:假装记忆力一般较差。我们让参与者有机会在一般记忆回忆测试中揭示这种糟糕的记忆。参与者首先观看了一段秘密会议的视频,并被引导相信他们会就这段视频接受采访。参与者被要求如实回忆(说真话的人)或故意歪曲一些事实(说假话的人),并有时间为即将到来的面试做准备。在采访中,我们给参与者看了一段视频(标记为把戏视频)来测试他们的一般记忆力。我们要求他们尽可能详细和准确地报告这个技巧视频。我们在这次回忆之后完成了采访,并没有要求他们回忆秘密会议的视频。一半的参与者被要求在回忆魔术视频时画草图。众所周知,画草图有助于记忆。正如预测的那样,那些认为自己必须在秘密会议视频上撒谎的人在回忆技巧视频时的表现比那些认为自己必须在秘密会议视频上说实话的人要差,尤其是在画草图的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书