TOWARDS THE ISSUE OF EVOLUTION OF ART IN THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES: CULTUROLOGICAL ANALYSIS

S. Simonova, G. B. Atalyan
{"title":"TOWARDS THE ISSUE OF EVOLUTION OF ART IN THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES: CULTUROLOGICAL ANALYSIS","authors":"S. Simonova, G. B. Atalyan","doi":"10.37313/2413-9645-2022-24-84-84-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Art, its role, ways of creation, translation and perception have undergone significant changes in the course of the last century. In general, one can talk of aestheticisation of culture, which could not but have a certain impact on art. The departure from “classical art” began already in the epoch of modernism. The “digital turn” has contributed to new hypostasis of art in culture. The virtual medium has introduced new, unprecedented opportunities both in technical and spiritual aspects. Artworks have become more accessible to the general public, with a possibility of user intervention in creative process and the use of artificial intelligence therein. The phenomenon of cyber art has emerged, requiring profound culturological analysis. The use of digital technologies in creation of artworks actualises the issue of constraints of artificial intelligence potential in creative process as well as the problem of ethical and aesthetic content of works created by neural network with the use of algorithms and other digital technologies. In this regard, the notion of mosaic culture is important – as consisting of disparate elements, lacking consistency and integrity of perception and cognition. The mosaic culture refers one to the concept of “rhizome,” reflecting as well the consumer-oriented aspect of the mass culture. Therefore, this entails a danger of replacing the unique nature by mainstream values, and, moreover, of transformation or even loss of the original ontological and axiological sense of the artwork.","PeriodicalId":284515,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya of the Samara Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, Humanitarian, Medicobiological Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya of the Samara Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social, Humanitarian, Medicobiological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37313/2413-9645-2022-24-84-84-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Art, its role, ways of creation, translation and perception have undergone significant changes in the course of the last century. In general, one can talk of aestheticisation of culture, which could not but have a certain impact on art. The departure from “classical art” began already in the epoch of modernism. The “digital turn” has contributed to new hypostasis of art in culture. The virtual medium has introduced new, unprecedented opportunities both in technical and spiritual aspects. Artworks have become more accessible to the general public, with a possibility of user intervention in creative process and the use of artificial intelligence therein. The phenomenon of cyber art has emerged, requiring profound culturological analysis. The use of digital technologies in creation of artworks actualises the issue of constraints of artificial intelligence potential in creative process as well as the problem of ethical and aesthetic content of works created by neural network with the use of algorithms and other digital technologies. In this regard, the notion of mosaic culture is important – as consisting of disparate elements, lacking consistency and integrity of perception and cognition. The mosaic culture refers one to the concept of “rhizome,” reflecting as well the consumer-oriented aspect of the mass culture. Therefore, this entails a danger of replacing the unique nature by mainstream values, and, moreover, of transformation or even loss of the original ontological and axiological sense of the artwork.
20世纪和21世纪艺术演变的问题:文化分析
艺术,它的角色,创作方式,翻译和感知在上个世纪的过程中发生了重大变化。总的来说,可以说文化的审美化,这不能不对艺术产生一定的影响。对“古典艺术”的背离早在现代主义时代就开始了。“数字化转向”促成了艺术在文化中的新本质。虚拟媒介在技术和精神方面都带来了前所未有的新机会。艺术作品变得更容易为大众所接受,用户有可能介入创作过程,并在其中使用人工智能。网络艺术现象已经出现,需要深入的文化分析。数字技术在艺术品创作中的应用,体现了人工智能潜力在创作过程中的约束问题,以及神经网络利用算法和其他数字技术创作作品的伦理和美学内容问题。在这方面,马赛克文化的概念很重要,因为它由不同的元素组成,缺乏感知和认知的一致性和完整性。马赛克文化指的是“根茎”的概念,也反映了大众文化以消费为导向的一面。因此,这就有被主流价值取代独特性的危险,更有可能导致艺术作品原有的本体论和价值论意义的转变甚至丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信