Chapter Ten. Wahhabis, Sufis and Salafis in early twentieth century Damascus

D. Commins
{"title":"Chapter Ten. Wahhabis, Sufis and Salafis in early twentieth century Damascus","authors":"D. Commins","doi":"10.1163/EJ.9789004169531.I-342.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how allegations of Wahhabi influence became a point of controversy between rival camps of religious scholars in early twentieth century Damascus. Thus the focus here is on what \"Wahhabi\" meant in that context and how it was used in the polemics contained in religious treatises published between 1900 and the early 1920s. From these works, it appears that the Wahhabi issue and local religious discourse evolved over time. A model study of Wahhabism's reception in one locality is Bernard Haykel's splendid monograph on the Yemeni scholar Muhammad al-Shawkani. The reappraisal of the Wahhabis was undertaken by ʿulamaʾ in the Salafi movement. As for those defenders, we have a treatise by the Salafi writer Muhammad Bahjat al-Bitar, published under the pseudonym Abu al-Yasar al-Dimashqi al-Maydani. In conclusion, the first set of essays from 1900-1901 conform to a purely traditional mode of anti-Wahhabi discourse. Keywords: Salafi movement; twentieth century Damascus; Wahhabis","PeriodicalId":320543,"journal":{"name":"Guardians of Faith in Modern Times: ʿUlamaʾ in the Middle East","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Guardians of Faith in Modern Times: ʿUlamaʾ in the Middle East","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/EJ.9789004169531.I-342.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This chapter examines how allegations of Wahhabi influence became a point of controversy between rival camps of religious scholars in early twentieth century Damascus. Thus the focus here is on what "Wahhabi" meant in that context and how it was used in the polemics contained in religious treatises published between 1900 and the early 1920s. From these works, it appears that the Wahhabi issue and local religious discourse evolved over time. A model study of Wahhabism's reception in one locality is Bernard Haykel's splendid monograph on the Yemeni scholar Muhammad al-Shawkani. The reappraisal of the Wahhabis was undertaken by ʿulamaʾ in the Salafi movement. As for those defenders, we have a treatise by the Salafi writer Muhammad Bahjat al-Bitar, published under the pseudonym Abu al-Yasar al-Dimashqi al-Maydani. In conclusion, the first set of essays from 1900-1901 conform to a purely traditional mode of anti-Wahhabi discourse. Keywords: Salafi movement; twentieth century Damascus; Wahhabis
第十章。瓦哈比派,苏菲派和萨拉菲派在二十世纪早期的大马士革
本章考察了瓦哈比教派的影响是如何在二十世纪初的大马士革成为宗教学者的对立阵营之间争论的焦点。因此,这里的重点是“瓦哈比”在这种情况下意味着什么,以及它是如何在1900年至20世纪20年代初出版的宗教论文中使用的。从这些作品来看,瓦哈比问题和当地宗教话语似乎随着时间的推移而演变。伯纳德·海克尔(Bernard Haykel)关于也门学者穆罕默德·肖卡尼(Muhammad al-Shawkani)的精彩专著是瓦哈比派在一个地方接受情况的典范研究。对瓦哈比派的重新评价是由萨拉菲派运动中的乌拉玛·尼进行的。至于那些辩护者,我们有萨拉菲派作家Muhammad Bahjat al-Bitar的一篇论文,以笔名Abu al-Yasar al-Dimashqi al-Maydani出版。总之,第一组1900-1901年的文章符合一种纯粹传统的反瓦哈比话语模式。关键词:萨拉菲运动;二十世纪的大马士革;瓦哈比教派
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信