THE UTILITY OF ELASTOSONOGRAPHY FOR ASSESSING SUBURETHRAL TISSUE ELASTICITY IN WOMEN WITH STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE

E. Özkaya, Kamil Turgay, B. Durak, H. Tan, E. Ozalp, G. Bademci, S. Artan
{"title":"THE UTILITY OF ELASTOSONOGRAPHY FOR ASSESSING SUBURETHRAL TISSUE ELASTICITY IN WOMEN WITH STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE","authors":"E. Özkaya, Kamil Turgay, B. Durak, H. Tan, E. Ozalp, G. Bademci, S. Artan","doi":"10.5505/TJOD.2013.60376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Objective: To determine clinical and diagnostic value of elastosonography (ES) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Material and methods: Thirty subjects with SUI and 30 subjects without SUI were compared in terms of elastosonographic suburethral tissue elasticity. SUI and bladder neck hypermobility was determined by pad test, Q-tip and stress tests. Measurements points included under bladder (UB), subcutaneous fatty tissue (SC), and the urethra (U) points. Three indices were calculated using these measurements (UB/SC, U/SC and UB/U). The diagnostic value of ES indices were investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Results: ES UB/SC (AUC=0.962, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.953, P=0.001) were significant predictors for stress test positivity. ES UB/SC (AUC=0.883, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.885, P=0.001) were significant predictors for pad test positivity. ES UB/SC (AUC=0.877, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.857, P=0.001) were significant predictors for Q tip test positivity. In linear regression analysis, stress test positivity was significantly associated with the ES UB/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.369, P=0.026) and ES U/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.496, P=0.003). Conclusion: Elastosonographic tissue elasticity determination is a promising tool in bladder neck hypermobility and SUI diagnosis, and may be used as an adjunctive method in selecting patients appropriate for stress urinary incontinence surgery.","PeriodicalId":174635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/TJOD.2013.60376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARY Objective: To determine clinical and diagnostic value of elastosonography (ES) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Material and methods: Thirty subjects with SUI and 30 subjects without SUI were compared in terms of elastosonographic suburethral tissue elasticity. SUI and bladder neck hypermobility was determined by pad test, Q-tip and stress tests. Measurements points included under bladder (UB), subcutaneous fatty tissue (SC), and the urethra (U) points. Three indices were calculated using these measurements (UB/SC, U/SC and UB/U). The diagnostic value of ES indices were investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Results: ES UB/SC (AUC=0.962, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.953, P=0.001) were significant predictors for stress test positivity. ES UB/SC (AUC=0.883, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.885, P=0.001) were significant predictors for pad test positivity. ES UB/SC (AUC=0.877, P=0.001) and U/SC (AUC=0.857, P=0.001) were significant predictors for Q tip test positivity. In linear regression analysis, stress test positivity was significantly associated with the ES UB/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.369, P=0.026) and ES U/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.496, P=0.003). Conclusion: Elastosonographic tissue elasticity determination is a promising tool in bladder neck hypermobility and SUI diagnosis, and may be used as an adjunctive method in selecting patients appropriate for stress urinary incontinence surgery.
应用弹性超声评估女性压力性尿失禁的尿道下组织弹性
目的:探讨弹性超声(ES)对女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的临床和诊断价值。材料与方法:比较30例SUI患者与30例非SUI患者的静脉下组织弹性。尿垫试验、棉签试验和压力试验确定SUI和膀胱颈活动过度。测量点包括膀胱下(UB)、皮下脂肪组织(SC)和尿道(U)点。利用这些测量值计算了三个指标(UB/SC、U/SC和UB/U)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析ES指标的诊断价值。结果:ES UB/SC (AUC=0.962, P=0.001)和U/SC (AUC=0.953, P=0.001)是压力测试阳性的显著预测因子。ES UB/SC (AUC=0.883, P=0.001)和U/SC (AUC=0.885, P=0.001)是尿垫试验阳性的显著预测因子。ES UB/SC (AUC=0.877, P=0.001)和U/SC (AUC=0.857, P=0.001)是Q尖端检测阳性的显著预测因子。在线性回归分析中,压力测试阳性与ES UB/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.369, P=0.026)和ES U/SC (R2=0.84, beta=0.496, P=0.003)显著相关。结论:弹性超声组织弹性测定是诊断膀胱颈活动过度和SUI的一种有前景的工具,可作为选择适合压力性尿失禁手术患者的辅助方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信