Invasion

J. Capinera
{"title":"Invasion","authors":"J. Capinera","doi":"10.1515/9783110480986-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis To determine the origin and biological characteristics of vegetable pests, I reviewed the original scientific literature of over 330 pests known to feed on vegetable crops (Capinera 2001 and references therein), and compiled data on pest origin, period of introduction, host range, portion of plant damaged, and damage frequency. In most cases the literature contains reference to the likely source of these pests (126 of 135 invaders). However, for some cosmopolitan pests or poorly studied organisms the source is unknown or uncertain. Similarly, the period of detection in the United States and Canada varies from precise to unknown, with knowledge of the period of establishment (detection) limited to 87 of the 135 invading pests. Lack of data stems mostly from the early period of settlement, but invasions since 1900 are fairly well documented. The host range of the vegetable pests is quite well documented in the literature, although there is a tendency for species that are better studied to have longer lists of hosts. Also, during periods of great abundance (outbreak), pests often use hosts that they will not normally accept. Thus, outbreak species probably have inflated host ranges. For the purposes of this analysis, I have defined a narrow host range to consist of consumption of vegetable plants from a single botanical family. A moderate host range consists of consumption of vegetable plants from two to five families, and a wide host range is defined as consumption of greater than five families of vegetable crops. Damage frequency is based on the literature for each pest, as described elsewhere (Capinera 2001), and considers damage to both home gardens and commercial vegetable production. Damage frequency is designated as rare when there are few reports of serious injury in the literature. Damage frequency is considered periodic when there is general recognition that the organism is capable of The successful e s t a b l i s h m e n t in North America of invading pests is not a new phenomenon. Since the earliest arrival of European explorers and colonists, pests of plants have accompanied movement of people, food, and plant materials to the “ N e w World.” The long sea voyage during the initial stages of colonization likely inhibited extensive transport of many short-lived pests. Up until 1800, only about 36 species of insects invaded the United States (Simberloff 1986). However, by the late 1800s not only was the speed of transport greatly increased, but transport of living plant material (and associated pests) was commonplace. Sailer (1978, 1983) analyzed the invasion of the United States by arthropods. He reported that initially the invaders (immigrants) consisted mostly of Coleoptera, which arrived principally in ship ballast. The dominance by beetles decreased as more Lepidoptera and then Homoptera invaded, often in association with living plant material. The rate of invasion increased greatly after the 1860s as international commerce expanded. Sailer also noted that there was a slight reduction in the rate of invasion commencing in the 1920s as the Plant Quarantine Act of 1912 was implemented. Invasion by high-profile and damaging species in recent years has increased the awareness and concern by the scientific community, government, and the general public over invading species (U.S. Congress 1993, Simberloff et al. 1997, Sakai et al. 2001). The pattern of invasion is poorly documented, despite heightened concern, and many questions remain. Has the increase in international commerce and tourism in recent years resulted in higher rates of invasion and establishment of pests? Are we at greater risk from certain types of pests, or from certain sources? Are certain taxa of pests more likely to invade and establish successfully, and are all crops equally at risk? Here I address these questions and present a comparative analysis of indigenous (naIncreased concern over invasion by high-profile and damaging insects requires the answers to questions about the origin of pests, period of invasion, taxa, feeding behavior, damage frequency, and the influence of crop characteristics on pest species richness.","PeriodicalId":333486,"journal":{"name":"The Accidental History of the U.S. Immigration Courts","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Accidental History of the U.S. Immigration Courts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110480986-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analysis To determine the origin and biological characteristics of vegetable pests, I reviewed the original scientific literature of over 330 pests known to feed on vegetable crops (Capinera 2001 and references therein), and compiled data on pest origin, period of introduction, host range, portion of plant damaged, and damage frequency. In most cases the literature contains reference to the likely source of these pests (126 of 135 invaders). However, for some cosmopolitan pests or poorly studied organisms the source is unknown or uncertain. Similarly, the period of detection in the United States and Canada varies from precise to unknown, with knowledge of the period of establishment (detection) limited to 87 of the 135 invading pests. Lack of data stems mostly from the early period of settlement, but invasions since 1900 are fairly well documented. The host range of the vegetable pests is quite well documented in the literature, although there is a tendency for species that are better studied to have longer lists of hosts. Also, during periods of great abundance (outbreak), pests often use hosts that they will not normally accept. Thus, outbreak species probably have inflated host ranges. For the purposes of this analysis, I have defined a narrow host range to consist of consumption of vegetable plants from a single botanical family. A moderate host range consists of consumption of vegetable plants from two to five families, and a wide host range is defined as consumption of greater than five families of vegetable crops. Damage frequency is based on the literature for each pest, as described elsewhere (Capinera 2001), and considers damage to both home gardens and commercial vegetable production. Damage frequency is designated as rare when there are few reports of serious injury in the literature. Damage frequency is considered periodic when there is general recognition that the organism is capable of The successful e s t a b l i s h m e n t in North America of invading pests is not a new phenomenon. Since the earliest arrival of European explorers and colonists, pests of plants have accompanied movement of people, food, and plant materials to the “ N e w World.” The long sea voyage during the initial stages of colonization likely inhibited extensive transport of many short-lived pests. Up until 1800, only about 36 species of insects invaded the United States (Simberloff 1986). However, by the late 1800s not only was the speed of transport greatly increased, but transport of living plant material (and associated pests) was commonplace. Sailer (1978, 1983) analyzed the invasion of the United States by arthropods. He reported that initially the invaders (immigrants) consisted mostly of Coleoptera, which arrived principally in ship ballast. The dominance by beetles decreased as more Lepidoptera and then Homoptera invaded, often in association with living plant material. The rate of invasion increased greatly after the 1860s as international commerce expanded. Sailer also noted that there was a slight reduction in the rate of invasion commencing in the 1920s as the Plant Quarantine Act of 1912 was implemented. Invasion by high-profile and damaging species in recent years has increased the awareness and concern by the scientific community, government, and the general public over invading species (U.S. Congress 1993, Simberloff et al. 1997, Sakai et al. 2001). The pattern of invasion is poorly documented, despite heightened concern, and many questions remain. Has the increase in international commerce and tourism in recent years resulted in higher rates of invasion and establishment of pests? Are we at greater risk from certain types of pests, or from certain sources? Are certain taxa of pests more likely to invade and establish successfully, and are all crops equally at risk? Here I address these questions and present a comparative analysis of indigenous (naIncreased concern over invasion by high-profile and damaging insects requires the answers to questions about the origin of pests, period of invasion, taxa, feeding behavior, damage frequency, and the influence of crop characteristics on pest species richness.
入侵
为了确定蔬菜有害生物的来源和生物学特性,我查阅了已知的330多种以蔬菜作物为食的有害生物的原始科学文献(Capinera 2001及其参考文献),整理了有害生物的来源、传入时间、寄主范围、危害植物的比例和危害频率等数据。在大多数情况下,文献包含了这些害虫可能的来源(135个入侵者中的126个)。然而,对于一些世界性的害虫或研究较少的生物体,其来源是未知的或不确定的。同样,在美国和加拿大,发现周期从精确到未知不等,对135种入侵害虫的建立(发现)周期的了解仅限于87种。缺乏数据主要源于早期的定居,但自1900年以来的入侵有相当好的记录。蔬菜害虫的寄主范围在文献中有很好的记载,尽管有一种趋势,即研究得更好的物种有更长的寄主名单。此外,在大量繁殖(爆发)期间,害虫通常会使用它们通常不接受的宿主。因此,爆发的物种可能有膨胀的宿主范围。为了这个分析的目的,我定义了一个狭窄的寄主范围,包括来自单一植物科的蔬菜植物的消费。中等寄主范围包括食用2至5科蔬菜植物,广泛寄主范围定义为食用5科以上蔬菜作物。如其他地方所述(Capinera 2001),危害频率基于每种害虫的文献,并考虑对家庭菜园和商业蔬菜生产的危害。当文献中很少报道严重损伤时,损伤频率被指定为罕见。当人们普遍认识到这种生物有能力时,破坏频率就被认为是周期性的。在北美,成功的害虫入侵并不是一个新现象。自从欧洲探险者和殖民者最早到达新大陆以来,植物害虫就一直伴随着人类、食物和植物材料的迁徙来到新大陆。在殖民的最初阶段,漫长的海上航行可能抑制了许多短命害虫的广泛传播。直到1800年,只有大约36种昆虫入侵美国(Simberloff 1986)。然而,到了19世纪末,不仅运输速度大大提高,而且运输活的植物材料(以及相关的害虫)也变得司空见惯。Sailer(1978, 1983)分析了节肢动物入侵美国的情况。他报告说,最初的入侵者(移民)主要由鞘翅目昆虫组成,它们主要是通过船舶压舱物到达的。随着鳞翅目和同翅目的入侵,甲虫的优势地位逐渐下降,通常与活的植物材料有关。19世纪60年代以后,随着国际贸易的扩大,入侵的速度大大增加。塞勒还指出,随着1912年《植物检疫法》的实施,从20世纪20年代开始,入侵率略有下降。近年来,高知名度和破坏性物种的入侵提高了科学界、政府和公众对入侵物种的认识和关注(U.S. Congress 1993, Simberloff et al. 1997, Sakai et al. 2001)。尽管受到高度关注,但对入侵模式的记录却很少,许多问题仍然存在。近年来国际贸易和旅游业的增长是否导致了害虫入侵和定居的增加?我们是否有更大的风险来自某些类型的害虫,或来自某些来源?是否某些种类的害虫更有可能入侵并成功建立?是否所有作物都面临同样的风险?对高知名度和破坏性昆虫入侵的日益关注需要回答害虫的起源、入侵期、分类群、摄食行为、伤害频率以及作物特征对害虫物种丰富度的影响等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信