Bright on the right feels right: SQUARC compatibility is hedonically marked

Charlotte S Löffler, Judith Gerten, Mariam Mamporia, J.J.A. Müller, Theresa Neu, Julia Rumpf, Miriam Schiller, Yannik Schneider, Mirella Wozniak, Sascha Topolinski
{"title":"Bright on the right feels right: SQUARC compatibility is hedonically marked","authors":"Charlotte S Löffler, Judith Gerten, Mariam Mamporia, J.J.A. Müller, Theresa Neu, Julia Rumpf, Miriam Schiller, Yannik Schneider, Mirella Wozniak, Sascha Topolinski","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2022.2053660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT According to the Spatial Quantity Association of Response Codes (SQUARC), people hold a mental association between horizontal position and quantity (lower quantities left, higher quantities right). While a large body of research has explored this effect for response speed and judgment accuracy, the affective downstream consequences of the SQUARC remain unexplored. Aiming to address this gap, the present two experiments (pre-registered, total N = 521) investigated whether stimulus arrangements that are compatible with the SQUARC for luminance are affectively preferred to stimulus arrangements that are incompatible. SQUARC-compatible square arrangements (dark-left, bright-right) were preferred over SQUARC-incompatible square arrangements (dark-right, bright-left). The preference for SQUARC compatibility was not moderated by the horizontal orientation of the response scale. Our results confirm the direction of the spatial-luminance association and provide initial support that the cognitive processing of SQUARC compatibility is hedonically marked and appears sufficient to impact affective evaluations.","PeriodicalId":128345,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Emotion","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2053660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT According to the Spatial Quantity Association of Response Codes (SQUARC), people hold a mental association between horizontal position and quantity (lower quantities left, higher quantities right). While a large body of research has explored this effect for response speed and judgment accuracy, the affective downstream consequences of the SQUARC remain unexplored. Aiming to address this gap, the present two experiments (pre-registered, total N = 521) investigated whether stimulus arrangements that are compatible with the SQUARC for luminance are affectively preferred to stimulus arrangements that are incompatible. SQUARC-compatible square arrangements (dark-left, bright-right) were preferred over SQUARC-incompatible square arrangements (dark-right, bright-left). The preference for SQUARC compatibility was not moderated by the horizontal orientation of the response scale. Our results confirm the direction of the spatial-luminance association and provide initial support that the cognitive processing of SQUARC compatibility is hedonically marked and appears sufficient to impact affective evaluations.
右边亮的感觉不错:SQUARC的兼容性是快乐的标志
根据反应码的空间数量关联(SQUARC),人们在水平位置和数量之间存在一种心理关联(左边的数量较少,右边的数量较多)。虽然大量的研究已经探索了这种对反应速度和判断准确性的影响,但SQUARC的影响下游后果仍未被探索。为了解决这一差距,本实验(预注册,总N = 521)研究了与SQUARC亮度相容的刺激安排是否比不相容的刺激安排更有效。与方形不相容的方形排列(黑暗-左,明亮-右)相比,方形相容的方形排列(黑暗-右,明亮-左)更受欢迎。对SQUARC相容性的偏好不受反应量表水平方向的影响。我们的研究结果证实了空间-亮度关联的方向,并提供了SQUARC兼容性的认知加工具有享乐标记,足以影响情感评价的初步支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信