Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)–Bahasa Indonesia

L. Natalya, Cynthia Vivian Purwanto
{"title":"Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)–Bahasa Indonesia","authors":"L. Natalya, Cynthia Vivian Purwanto","doi":"10.7454/HUBS.ASIA.2130118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Validity evidence based on internal structure is important for psychological measurements and this internal structure can be evaluated by factor analysis. Two types of factor analysis are often conducted on psychometric tests: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). This study compared the groupings of the 30-item Indonesian version of the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS–Bahasa Indonesia), using both CFA and EFA. The CFA of the data sample from 1,168 undergraduates indicated that all dimensions and sub dimensions of the AMS–Bahasa Indonesia had good internal structural validity. Each subdimension, dimension, and variable of the AMS–Bahasa Indonesia fulfilled the goodness of fit criteria (RMSEA ≤ 0.08; GFI ≥ 0.9; CR ≥ 0.7). The EFA showed that all items of the three dimensions grouped perfectly as designed by Vallerand et al. (1992), and the factor loading values of all items are greater than or equal to 0.4. Although there are cross loadings of items, it can be explained as why it occurs. The results of the internal consistency analysis showed that the AMS–Bahasa Indonesia is a reliable measurement (α ≥ 0.7). In conclusion the AMS–Bahasa Indonesia is a valid instrument for measuring academic motivation accurately and reliably. Analisis Faktor Eksploratori dan Konfirmatori pada Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)–Bahasa Indonesia","PeriodicalId":165722,"journal":{"name":"Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia","volume":"250 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/HUBS.ASIA.2130118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Validity evidence based on internal structure is important for psychological measurements and this internal structure can be evaluated by factor analysis. Two types of factor analysis are often conducted on psychometric tests: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). This study compared the groupings of the 30-item Indonesian version of the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS–Bahasa Indonesia), using both CFA and EFA. The CFA of the data sample from 1,168 undergraduates indicated that all dimensions and sub dimensions of the AMS–Bahasa Indonesia had good internal structural validity. Each subdimension, dimension, and variable of the AMS–Bahasa Indonesia fulfilled the goodness of fit criteria (RMSEA ≤ 0.08; GFI ≥ 0.9; CR ≥ 0.7). The EFA showed that all items of the three dimensions grouped perfectly as designed by Vallerand et al. (1992), and the factor loading values of all items are greater than or equal to 0.4. Although there are cross loadings of items, it can be explained as why it occurs. The results of the internal consistency analysis showed that the AMS–Bahasa Indonesia is a reliable measurement (α ≥ 0.7). In conclusion the AMS–Bahasa Indonesia is a valid instrument for measuring academic motivation accurately and reliably. Analisis Faktor Eksploratori dan Konfirmatori pada Academic Motivation Scale (AMS)–Bahasa Indonesia
学业动机量表(AMS) -印尼语之探索性与验证性因子分析
基于内部结构的效度证据对心理测量很重要,这种内部结构可以通过因子分析来评估。在心理测试中,常进行两种类型的因素分析:验证性因素分析(confirmatory factor analysis, CFA)和探索性因素分析(exploratory factor analysis, EFA)。本研究采用CFA和EFA两种方法,比较了30项印尼版学业动机量表(AMS-Bahasa Indonesia)的分组。对1168名大学生数据样本的CFA检验表明,ams -印尼语量表各维度和子维度均具有良好的内部结构效度。ams -印尼语各子维度、维度、变量均满足拟合优度标准(RMSEA≤0.08;Gfi≥0.9;Cr≥0.7)。EFA显示,三个维度的所有项目都按照Vallerand et al.(1992)的设计完美分组,所有项目的因子加载值都大于等于0.4。虽然存在项目的交叉加载,但它可以解释为什么会发生。内部一致性分析结果表明,ams -印尼语是一个可靠的测量方法(α≥0.7)。综上所述,ams -印尼语是一种准确、可靠地测量学习动机的有效工具。学习动机量表(AMS) -印尼语
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信