Collaborative Writing Against the Ability to Write Explanatory Texts in Discipline Learning

M. Melisa, Y. Pebriani, R. Tiawati, R. Satini, S. Dwinitia, T. Helda
{"title":"Collaborative Writing Against the Ability to Write Explanatory Texts in Discipline Learning","authors":"M. Melisa, Y. Pebriani, R. Tiawati, R. Satini, S. Dwinitia, T. Helda","doi":"10.4108/EAI.23-3-2019.2284979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability of students to write explanatory texts is still low. First, students tend not to pay attention to the structure and language of the explanatory text in writing. Secondly, students are weak in writing explanatory texts because students have difficulty communicating the material into written form. Third, it is difficult for students to develop ideas in written form. Fourth, students are still not able to make effective sentences and use punctuation that is not right. The results of data processing on the ability to write explanatory texts First, the ability to write explanatory texts before using students' collaborative writing technique is 54.46. Second, the ability to write explanatory texts after using collaborative writing techniques. Third, there is a significant influence on the use of collaborative writing techniques on the ability to write explanatory text of students. This is evidenced by the results of research that show that the value of tcount (5.74)> ttable (1.71), so that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted.","PeriodicalId":222337,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, ICEL 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2019","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, ICEL 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.23-3-2019.2284979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability of students to write explanatory texts is still low. First, students tend not to pay attention to the structure and language of the explanatory text in writing. Secondly, students are weak in writing explanatory texts because students have difficulty communicating the material into written form. Third, it is difficult for students to develop ideas in written form. Fourth, students are still not able to make effective sentences and use punctuation that is not right. The results of data processing on the ability to write explanatory texts First, the ability to write explanatory texts before using students' collaborative writing technique is 54.46. Second, the ability to write explanatory texts after using collaborative writing techniques. Third, there is a significant influence on the use of collaborative writing techniques on the ability to write explanatory text of students. This is evidenced by the results of research that show that the value of tcount (5.74)> ttable (1.71), so that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted.
协作写作与学科学习中解释性文本写作能力的对比
学生写解释性课文的能力仍然很低。首先,学生在写作中往往不注意解释性文本的结构和语言。其次,学生在写解释性文本方面很弱,因为学生很难将材料转化为书面形式。第三,学生很难以书面形式发展思想。第四,学生们仍然不能造出有效的句子,使用错误的标点符号。首先,在使用学生协作写作技巧之前,解释性文本的写作能力是54.46。第二,使用协作写作技巧后撰写解释性文本的能力。第三,使用协作写作技巧对学生的解释性文本写作能力有显著影响。研究结果证明,tcount (5.74)> table(1.71),因此拒绝H0,接受H1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信