Legacy test systems — Replace or maintain

J. Kent, M. Dewey
{"title":"Legacy test systems — Replace or maintain","authors":"J. Kent, M. Dewey","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.2016.7589645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test platforms age, the components within the test systems degrade, become obsolete and wear out over time. Manufacturing companies must continuously evaluate the expected lifespan of their test equipment and determine the risk and tradeoffs associated with replacing the equipment vs. maintaining the equipment. Both industry and government entities continually struggle with how to best evaluate and address the issues of aging test equipment and systems. This paper reviews the various options available to test engineers when faced with replacing or maintaining a test system. Specifically, the manufacturing / test community must evaluate the consequences, risks and costs associated with each choice: 1. Do nothing and continue to maintain equipment until equipment failure. 2. Rejuvenate equipment by replacing components / instruments. 3. Replace existing equipment with modern automated test equipment. 4. Outsource manufacturing and test of product to a supplier. To help quantify the decision making process the use of an evaluation tool can help analyze the factors that influence the “replace or maintain” question. Each of the options listed above carries with it its own list of questions that must be addressed. These questions are encoded into the tool with responses then interpreted and results collated with user historical data, providing the test engineer with quantifiable and meaningful data for evaluating the cost of replacing or maintain factory test equipment. The following sections detail how this tool can be developed and utilized as part of the “replace or maintain” decisional process.","PeriodicalId":314357,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE AUTOTESTCON","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE AUTOTESTCON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.2016.7589645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Test platforms age, the components within the test systems degrade, become obsolete and wear out over time. Manufacturing companies must continuously evaluate the expected lifespan of their test equipment and determine the risk and tradeoffs associated with replacing the equipment vs. maintaining the equipment. Both industry and government entities continually struggle with how to best evaluate and address the issues of aging test equipment and systems. This paper reviews the various options available to test engineers when faced with replacing or maintaining a test system. Specifically, the manufacturing / test community must evaluate the consequences, risks and costs associated with each choice: 1. Do nothing and continue to maintain equipment until equipment failure. 2. Rejuvenate equipment by replacing components / instruments. 3. Replace existing equipment with modern automated test equipment. 4. Outsource manufacturing and test of product to a supplier. To help quantify the decision making process the use of an evaluation tool can help analyze the factors that influence the “replace or maintain” question. Each of the options listed above carries with it its own list of questions that must be addressed. These questions are encoded into the tool with responses then interpreted and results collated with user historical data, providing the test engineer with quantifiable and meaningful data for evaluating the cost of replacing or maintain factory test equipment. The following sections detail how this tool can be developed and utilized as part of the “replace or maintain” decisional process.
遗留测试系统-更换或维护
随着时间的推移,测试平台会老化,测试系统中的组件会退化,变得过时和磨损。制造公司必须持续评估其测试设备的预期寿命,并确定更换设备与维护设备相关的风险和权衡。行业和政府机构一直在为如何最好地评估和解决老化测试设备和系统的问题而斗争。本文回顾了测试工程师在更换或维护测试系统时可用的各种选择。具体地说,制造/测试社区必须评估与每个选择相关的后果、风险和成本:什么都不做,继续维护设备,直到设备出现故障。2. 通过更换部件/仪器来更新设备。3.用现代化的自动化测试设备替换现有设备。4. 将产品的制造和测试外包给供应商。为了帮助量化决策过程,使用评估工具可以帮助分析影响“更换或维护”问题的因素。上面列出的每个选项都有自己必须解决的问题列表。这些问题被编码到工具中,然后进行解释,结果与用户历史数据进行比对,为测试工程师提供可量化和有意义的数据,以评估更换或维护工厂测试设备的成本。以下部分详细介绍了如何开发和利用该工具作为“替换或维护”决策过程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信