A comparative analysis of protocols for IoT network management

Levi Costa Mota, E. Moreno, A. Ribeiro
{"title":"A comparative analysis of protocols for IoT network management","authors":"Levi Costa Mota, E. Moreno, A. Ribeiro","doi":"10.1145/3293614.3293646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity and growth of new smart objects networks are generating a new demand for the maintenance of these devices, with the need to remotely monitor and control these devices without consuming significant resources. Analyzing the memory and electric power consumption of the protocols used in the management of these networks is a way to highlight the best protocol alternatives for this type of application. This study develops an experimental study, analyzing the behavior of SNMP, Zabbix, and MQTT protocols, in terms of memory and electric power consumption, when it is used in an Internet of Things application, with a sensor device implemented on the ESP8266. The experiment is performed by monitoring devices in an environment with some Motes and a Zabbix server. The study analyzes the ROM and RAM memories occupied by the firmware code, in addition to the electric power consumption of each protocol. At the end, the study confirms that the three protocols analyzed are supported by the platform used. The research shows that the SNMP is the protocol that consumes the least amount of device memory, that there is no significant difference in the energy consumption between the protocols, and that the MQTT protocol is suitable to be used in this environment and it also enables a significant reduction in energy consumption.","PeriodicalId":359590,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3293614.3293646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The complexity and growth of new smart objects networks are generating a new demand for the maintenance of these devices, with the need to remotely monitor and control these devices without consuming significant resources. Analyzing the memory and electric power consumption of the protocols used in the management of these networks is a way to highlight the best protocol alternatives for this type of application. This study develops an experimental study, analyzing the behavior of SNMP, Zabbix, and MQTT protocols, in terms of memory and electric power consumption, when it is used in an Internet of Things application, with a sensor device implemented on the ESP8266. The experiment is performed by monitoring devices in an environment with some Motes and a Zabbix server. The study analyzes the ROM and RAM memories occupied by the firmware code, in addition to the electric power consumption of each protocol. At the end, the study confirms that the three protocols analyzed are supported by the platform used. The research shows that the SNMP is the protocol that consumes the least amount of device memory, that there is no significant difference in the energy consumption between the protocols, and that the MQTT protocol is suitable to be used in this environment and it also enables a significant reduction in energy consumption.
物联网网络管理协议的比较分析
新型智能对象网络的复杂性和增长对这些设备的维护产生了新的需求,需要在不消耗大量资源的情况下远程监控和控制这些设备。分析这些网络管理中使用的协议的内存和功耗是一种突出这类应用程序的最佳协议替代方案的方法。本研究开展了一项实验研究,分析SNMP、Zabbix和MQTT协议在ESP8266上实现的传感器设备在物联网应用中使用时的内存和功耗行为。实验是在一个有一些Motes和Zabbix服务器的环境中通过监控设备进行的。该研究分析了固件代码所占用的ROM和RAM内存,以及每种协议的功耗。最后,研究证实了所使用的平台支持所分析的三种协议。研究表明,SNMP是消耗设备内存最少的协议,协议之间的能耗没有明显差异,MQTT协议适合在这种环境中使用,并且可以显著降低能耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信