Mode effects on socially desirable responding in web surveys compared to face-to-face and telephone surveys

N. Berzelak, Vasja Vehovar
{"title":"Mode effects on socially desirable responding in web surveys compared to face-to-face and telephone surveys","authors":"N. Berzelak, Vasja Vehovar","doi":"10.51936/lrkv4884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper elaborates upon differences in socially desirable responding as being the result of mode effects between web, telephone, and face-to-face survey modes. Social desirability is one of the main threats to comparability of data between different modes. The paper conceptualises socially desirable responding as a specific type of mode effect, which is not only a result of inherent characteristics of a survey mode, but is also mediated and moderated by complex interdependencies of specific survey implementations, contextual factors, and characteristics and behaviours of respondents. While web surveys are generally less prone to socially desirable responding, it is essential to be wary of circumstances that may reduce the perceived privacy of the survey situation and lead to biased reporting. The presented empirical study analyses the answers to a large number of items used in a pilot implementation of the Generations and Gender Survey across the three modes to gain insights into the incidence of socially desirable responding and its role in the observed differences in estimates. The comparison of means, distributions, and proportions of extreme responses to scale questions is performed across 89 survey items. The results are in line with the previous findings on lower susceptibility of web surveys to social desirability bias. More importantly, the findings suggest that the problem of socially desirable responding is likely to be a major contributor to the differences in mean estimates, response distributions, and the level of extreme responding between the studied modes.","PeriodicalId":242585,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Methodology and Statistics","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Methodology and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/lrkv4884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper elaborates upon differences in socially desirable responding as being the result of mode effects between web, telephone, and face-to-face survey modes. Social desirability is one of the main threats to comparability of data between different modes. The paper conceptualises socially desirable responding as a specific type of mode effect, which is not only a result of inherent characteristics of a survey mode, but is also mediated and moderated by complex interdependencies of specific survey implementations, contextual factors, and characteristics and behaviours of respondents. While web surveys are generally less prone to socially desirable responding, it is essential to be wary of circumstances that may reduce the perceived privacy of the survey situation and lead to biased reporting. The presented empirical study analyses the answers to a large number of items used in a pilot implementation of the Generations and Gender Survey across the three modes to gain insights into the incidence of socially desirable responding and its role in the observed differences in estimates. The comparison of means, distributions, and proportions of extreme responses to scale questions is performed across 89 survey items. The results are in line with the previous findings on lower susceptibility of web surveys to social desirability bias. More importantly, the findings suggest that the problem of socially desirable responding is likely to be a major contributor to the differences in mean estimates, response distributions, and the level of extreme responding between the studied modes.
与面对面调查和电话调查相比,网络调查模式对社会期望反应的影响
本文详细阐述了社会期望反应的差异,作为网络,电话和面对面调查模式之间模式效应的结果。社会期望是不同模式之间数据可比性的主要威胁之一。本文将社会期望反应概念化为一种特定类型的模式效应,它不仅是调查模式固有特征的结果,而且还受到具体调查实施、背景因素、受访者特征和行为之间复杂的相互依赖关系的中介和调节。虽然网络调查通常不太容易得到社会期望的回应,但有必要警惕可能降低调查情况的感知隐私并导致有偏见的报道的情况。本实证研究分析了在三种模式的代际和性别调查试点实施中使用的大量项目的答案,以深入了解社会期望反应的发生率及其在观察到的估计差异中的作用。在89个调查项目中,对尺度问题的均值、分布和极端回答的比例进行了比较。这一结果与之前的研究结果一致,即网络调查对社会期望偏见的敏感性较低。更重要的是,研究结果表明,社会期望反应的问题可能是研究模式之间平均估计、反应分布和极端反应水平差异的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信