Border studies in the contemporary world: progress in theory and main directions

{"title":"Border studies in the contemporary world: progress in theory and main directions","authors":"","doi":"10.5922/1994-5280-2022-3-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Тhe objective of the paper is a brief analysis of the reasons for the growing interest in border studies and the progress of their theory. Numerous approaches to border studies can be divided into two large types - pragmatic and critical. The traditional pragmatic approach, based on an analysis of the functions of borders and using mainly historical-cartographic, functional, typological and statistical methods, has been significantly developed thanks to attention to non-state actors – local authorities, business, NGOs, etc., a much more extensive information base, strengthening understanding of the importance of cross- border cooperation and social practices related to the border. The critical approach is aimed at studying the cognitive-symbolic functions of borders associated with their perception, representation as sign systems, the politics of memory, discourses and narratives. Now, pragmatic and critical approaches are integrated, including in the model «practice – policy – perception». Largely influenced by the geopolitical shifts of recent years, seven key themes have emerged in the growing flow of border studies. They include the role of borders as a tool for controlling international migration and regulating other social processes, the widespread activation of the barrier function of borders, the redistribution of functions between them, etc. A possible direction for further development of border studies is the relationship and isomorphism of boundaries at different levels. Isomorphism means the similarity of functions of formal (state, administrative) boundaries at all levels, although manifested in different ways and in different proportions at each of them. The reason for this similarity lies in the fact that borders act as a means of adapting space to the redistribution of political influence between different actors and centers, changes in their geopolitical position, and the territorial distribution of the population and economy.","PeriodicalId":148240,"journal":{"name":"Regional nye issledovaniya","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional nye issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2022-3-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Тhe objective of the paper is a brief analysis of the reasons for the growing interest in border studies and the progress of their theory. Numerous approaches to border studies can be divided into two large types - pragmatic and critical. The traditional pragmatic approach, based on an analysis of the functions of borders and using mainly historical-cartographic, functional, typological and statistical methods, has been significantly developed thanks to attention to non-state actors – local authorities, business, NGOs, etc., a much more extensive information base, strengthening understanding of the importance of cross- border cooperation and social practices related to the border. The critical approach is aimed at studying the cognitive-symbolic functions of borders associated with their perception, representation as sign systems, the politics of memory, discourses and narratives. Now, pragmatic and critical approaches are integrated, including in the model «practice – policy – perception». Largely influenced by the geopolitical shifts of recent years, seven key themes have emerged in the growing flow of border studies. They include the role of borders as a tool for controlling international migration and regulating other social processes, the widespread activation of the barrier function of borders, the redistribution of functions between them, etc. A possible direction for further development of border studies is the relationship and isomorphism of boundaries at different levels. Isomorphism means the similarity of functions of formal (state, administrative) boundaries at all levels, although manifested in different ways and in different proportions at each of them. The reason for this similarity lies in the fact that borders act as a means of adapting space to the redistribution of political influence between different actors and centers, changes in their geopolitical position, and the territorial distribution of the population and economy.
当代世界的边界研究:理论进展与主要方向
Тhe本文的目的是简要分析对边界研究越来越感兴趣的原因及其理论的进展。边界研究的许多方法可以分为两大类——实用主义和批判性。传统的实用主义方法基于对边界功能的分析,主要使用历史-制图,功能,类型和统计方法,由于对非国家行为者-地方当局,企业,非政府组织等的关注,更广泛的信息库,加强了对跨境合作和与边界有关的社会实践重要性的理解,这种方法得到了显著发展。批判性方法旨在研究边界的认知符号功能,这些功能与边界的感知、表征作为符号系统、记忆政治、话语和叙事有关。现在,务实和批判的方法被整合在一起,包括在“实践-政策-感知”模型中。受近年来地缘政治变化的影响,在不断增长的边界研究中出现了七个关键主题。它们包括边界作为控制国际移徙和调节其他社会进程的工具的作用、边界障碍功能的广泛激活、边界之间功能的重新分配等等。边界研究的一个可能的发展方向是不同层次边界的关系和同构性。同构是指各级形式(国家、行政)边界的功能相似,尽管在每个层次上以不同的方式和不同的比例表现出来。这种相似性的原因在于,边界是使空间适应不同行为体和中心之间政治影响力的再分配、地缘政治地位的变化以及人口和经济的领土分布的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信