{"title":"Group Learning in Optimizing the 5 Part of Collaborative Learning and Learning Performance","authors":"Muhammad Iffat Imtiyaza, Ibrahim Bin Said","doi":"10.30762/ijise.v1i1.281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The method was obtained from the results of research in the form of classroom action research that uses 2 periods in class X-B MAN 3 Kediri and the topic of discussion is plants (plantae). By using a group learning style helps in the improvement process: 1) the teacher provides learning topics in cycle I to cycle II where the teacher finds it difficult to manage the class situation because students are still unfamiliar with the group learning model but in cycle II the teacher is able to manage the class because students already familiar with the group model; 2) the 5 parts of the collaborative learning style obtained results in the second cycle, level K amounted to 1.248%, level C amounted to 11.248%, and level B amounted to 87.5%; and 3) student learning performance which was calculated with an average score collateral average and profit at the end of the study from the beginning of the data, cycle I, and cycle II. The mean values (54.7, 67.5, and 81.4) were the scores obtained and the end of the collateral learning resulted in the percentage (12.9%, 53.12%, and 93.75%). The research conducted at the end of the second cycle there were several students who scored (< 70) so that these students must be guided in understanding the material that has not been understood. The teacher must give thorough attention to all students in order to improve the 5 parts collaborative and student performance.","PeriodicalId":285477,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Journal of Integrated Science Education (IJISE)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Journal of Integrated Science Education (IJISE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30762/ijise.v1i1.281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The method was obtained from the results of research in the form of classroom action research that uses 2 periods in class X-B MAN 3 Kediri and the topic of discussion is plants (plantae). By using a group learning style helps in the improvement process: 1) the teacher provides learning topics in cycle I to cycle II where the teacher finds it difficult to manage the class situation because students are still unfamiliar with the group learning model but in cycle II the teacher is able to manage the class because students already familiar with the group model; 2) the 5 parts of the collaborative learning style obtained results in the second cycle, level K amounted to 1.248%, level C amounted to 11.248%, and level B amounted to 87.5%; and 3) student learning performance which was calculated with an average score collateral average and profit at the end of the study from the beginning of the data, cycle I, and cycle II. The mean values (54.7, 67.5, and 81.4) were the scores obtained and the end of the collateral learning resulted in the percentage (12.9%, 53.12%, and 93.75%). The research conducted at the end of the second cycle there were several students who scored (< 70) so that these students must be guided in understanding the material that has not been understood. The teacher must give thorough attention to all students in order to improve the 5 parts collaborative and student performance.
该方法以课堂行动研究的形式从研究结果中获得,该研究在X-B MAN 3 Kediri班使用了2个课时,讨论的主题是植物(plantae)。通过使用小组学习方式有助于改进过程:1)教师在周期1到周期2中提供学习主题,教师发现很难管理班级情况,因为学生仍然不熟悉小组学习模式,但在周期2中,教师能够管理班级,因为学生已经熟悉了小组学习模式;2)协作学习方式的5个部分在第二周期取得成果,K水平为1.248%,C水平为11.248%,B水平为87.5%;3)学生学习成绩,从数据开始、周期一、周期二开始,以学习结束时的平均分、附带平均分和利润计算。平均值(54.7,67.5,81.4)为获得的分数,附带学习结束的百分比(12.9%,53.12%,93.75%)。在第二个周期结束时进行的研究中,有几个学生得分(< 70),因此必须引导这些学生理解尚未理解的材料。教师必须对所有学生给予充分的关注,以提高5部分的协作和学生的表现。