'Defining What We Do – All Over Again': Occupational Identity, Technological Change, and the Librarian/Internet-Search Relationship

Andrew J. Nelson, J. Irwin
{"title":"'Defining What We Do – All Over Again': Occupational Identity, Technological Change, and the Librarian/Internet-Search Relationship","authors":"Andrew J. Nelson, J. Irwin","doi":"10.5465/AMJ.2012.0201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although a growing literature explores occupational identity, or the overlap between “who we are” and “what we do,” this literature has not fully considered how occupational identity may interact with technological change. In this paper, we explore this interaction, asking how an occupation’s identity shapes and is shaped by its interactions with a new technology. We focus, specifically, on the relationship between librarians and Internet search. Drawing on an analysis of 22 years of articles from library journals, we demonstrate how and why librarians initially discounted Internet search and differentiated themselves from it. We argue that these responses were associated with a “paradox of expertise,” by which librarians failed to innovate with one of the most important information technologies in history, despite their identity as masters of information. Later, however, we demonstrate how librarians engaged with this same technology, drawing upon it to redefine their occupational identity. Our findings demonstrate how occupational identity conditions the interpretation of a technology, while also showing how these interpretations can change with ongoing interactions. We also illustrate how occupational identity itself can change in response to new technology. Finally, we elaborate upon why expert insiders may not actually be best positioned to pursue emerging technologies.","PeriodicalId":301526,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"105","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2012.0201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 105

Abstract

Although a growing literature explores occupational identity, or the overlap between “who we are” and “what we do,” this literature has not fully considered how occupational identity may interact with technological change. In this paper, we explore this interaction, asking how an occupation’s identity shapes and is shaped by its interactions with a new technology. We focus, specifically, on the relationship between librarians and Internet search. Drawing on an analysis of 22 years of articles from library journals, we demonstrate how and why librarians initially discounted Internet search and differentiated themselves from it. We argue that these responses were associated with a “paradox of expertise,” by which librarians failed to innovate with one of the most important information technologies in history, despite their identity as masters of information. Later, however, we demonstrate how librarians engaged with this same technology, drawing upon it to redefine their occupational identity. Our findings demonstrate how occupational identity conditions the interpretation of a technology, while also showing how these interpretations can change with ongoing interactions. We also illustrate how occupational identity itself can change in response to new technology. Finally, we elaborate upon why expert insiders may not actually be best positioned to pursue emerging technologies.
“定义我们所做的一切”:职业身份、技术变革和图书馆员/互联网搜索关系
尽管越来越多的文献探讨了职业认同,或者“我们是谁”和“我们做什么”之间的重叠,但这些文献并没有充分考虑职业认同如何与技术变革相互作用。在本文中,我们探讨了这种相互作用,询问职业的身份如何与新技术的相互作用形成和形成。我们特别关注图书馆员和互联网搜索之间的关系。通过对22年来图书馆期刊文章的分析,我们证明了图书馆员最初是如何以及为什么不重视互联网搜索并将自己与之区分开来的。我们认为,这些反应与“专业知识悖论”有关,即图书馆员未能利用历史上最重要的信息技术之一进行创新,尽管他们是信息大师。然而,稍后,我们将演示图书馆员如何使用相同的技术,并利用它来重新定义他们的职业身份。我们的研究结果展示了职业身份如何影响对技术的解释,同时也展示了这些解释如何随着持续的互动而变化。我们还说明了职业身份本身如何随着新技术的发展而改变。最后,我们详细阐述了为什么专家内部人士实际上可能不是追求新兴技术的最佳人选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信