Correlation Analysis and Residual Error between Re-Analysis Data of the CFSR Model and Meteorological Stations

F. Barrera, W. Rojas
{"title":"Correlation Analysis and Residual Error between Re-Analysis Data of the CFSR Model and Meteorological Stations","authors":"F. Barrera, W. Rojas","doi":"10.1109/CIMPS.2018.8626060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes a work of analysis of correlations between Re-Analysis Data (RAD) of the climate-forecasting model known worldwide as CFSR (Climate Forecast System Reanalysis), and those provided by local Meteorological Stations (MS), installed in the geographical area study. We also seek to quantify and characterize the residual error in order to validate the RAD as a source of alternative information to the data of the MS (DMS). The study area that encompasses the work corresponds to the northern region of Chile Tarapacá region, adjacent to border areas with Peru, Bolivia and Argentina. There is evidence that MS Data in the Tarapacá region present quality problems to calculate the Climatic Extremes Indices (CEI). For this reason, this work performs the indicated analysis, through the use of Data Mining (DM) techniques, which include the correlation coefficients of Pearson, Spearman and Kendall. In addition, descriptive statistics are used, considering temperature and precipitation data, provided by 82 MS for the period 1983–2012. The study concludes that there are severe residual errors, and it is not recommended to use the RAD as an alternative information source to calculate the CEI, since these can be affected. However, the RAD manage to reproduce the behavior of the meteorological variables, which is why they can be used for qualitative studies of these).","PeriodicalId":159915,"journal":{"name":"2018 7th International Conference On Software Process Improvement (CIMPS)","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 7th International Conference On Software Process Improvement (CIMPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMPS.2018.8626060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article describes a work of analysis of correlations between Re-Analysis Data (RAD) of the climate-forecasting model known worldwide as CFSR (Climate Forecast System Reanalysis), and those provided by local Meteorological Stations (MS), installed in the geographical area study. We also seek to quantify and characterize the residual error in order to validate the RAD as a source of alternative information to the data of the MS (DMS). The study area that encompasses the work corresponds to the northern region of Chile Tarapacá region, adjacent to border areas with Peru, Bolivia and Argentina. There is evidence that MS Data in the Tarapacá region present quality problems to calculate the Climatic Extremes Indices (CEI). For this reason, this work performs the indicated analysis, through the use of Data Mining (DM) techniques, which include the correlation coefficients of Pearson, Spearman and Kendall. In addition, descriptive statistics are used, considering temperature and precipitation data, provided by 82 MS for the period 1983–2012. The study concludes that there are severe residual errors, and it is not recommended to use the RAD as an alternative information source to calculate the CEI, since these can be affected. However, the RAD manage to reproduce the behavior of the meteorological variables, which is why they can be used for qualitative studies of these).
CFSR模式再分析资料与气象站的相关分析及残差
本文介绍了在地理区域研究中使用的气候预报模型CFSR(气候预报系统再分析)的再分析数据(RAD)与地方气象站(MS)提供的数据之间的相关性分析工作。我们还试图量化和表征残余误差,以验证RAD作为MS (DMS)数据的替代信息来源。这项工作的研究区域对应于智利塔拉帕ac地区的北部地区,毗邻秘鲁、玻利维亚和阿根廷的边境地区。有证据表明,tarapac地区的MS数据在计算极端气候指数(CEI)时存在质量问题。出于这个原因,本工作通过使用数据挖掘(DM)技术,其中包括Pearson, Spearman和Kendall的相关系数,执行指定的分析。此外,考虑到1982 MS提供的1983-2012年期间的温度和降水数据,使用了描述性统计。研究的结论是存在严重的残余误差,不建议使用RAD作为计算CEI的替代信息源,因为这些可能会受到影响。然而,RAD设法再现气象变量的行为,这就是为什么它们可以用于这些变量的定性研究)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信