{"title":"Comparative Study of Regular and Irregular RC Structure in Different Seismic Zones and Soil Types","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/eesrr.05.04.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The resistivity of lateral forces (Wind and Seismic loading) by any structure is very much challenging. It is also one of the reasons for the failure of the reinforced concrete (RC) structure due to its asymmetric distribution of mass, strength, stiffness, and non-uniform geometrical configurations. Knowing the effect of various soils in the construction of RC structures is essential to determine the structural performance in the presence of seismic load ahead of construction. This research aims to compare regular and irregular RC structures in different seismic zones, and soil types with the provisions suggested in IS code 1893(part1):2016 and IS 875(part3):2015 using STAAD Pro V8i. Research work calculated the critical design loading for multi-story buildings put through basic wind speeds of 50 m/s and seismic zones (II, III, IV, V). The response of a G+20 storeyed RC framed building to seismic loads is examined using Indian Standard code IS 1893(part1):2016 and wind loads using Indian Standard code IS 875(part3):2015.","PeriodicalId":298809,"journal":{"name":"Earth & Environmental Science Research & Reviews","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth & Environmental Science Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/eesrr.05.04.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The resistivity of lateral forces (Wind and Seismic loading) by any structure is very much challenging. It is also one of the reasons for the failure of the reinforced concrete (RC) structure due to its asymmetric distribution of mass, strength, stiffness, and non-uniform geometrical configurations. Knowing the effect of various soils in the construction of RC structures is essential to determine the structural performance in the presence of seismic load ahead of construction. This research aims to compare regular and irregular RC structures in different seismic zones, and soil types with the provisions suggested in IS code 1893(part1):2016 and IS 875(part3):2015 using STAAD Pro V8i. Research work calculated the critical design loading for multi-story buildings put through basic wind speeds of 50 m/s and seismic zones (II, III, IV, V). The response of a G+20 storeyed RC framed building to seismic loads is examined using Indian Standard code IS 1893(part1):2016 and wind loads using Indian Standard code IS 875(part3):2015.
任何结构的侧向力(风和地震载荷)的电阻率都是非常具有挑战性的。这也是钢筋混凝土(RC)结构由于其质量、强度、刚度分布不对称和几何构型不均匀而破坏的原因之一。了解各种土壤对钢筋混凝土结构施工的影响,对于在施工前确定地震荷载作用下的结构性能至关重要。本研究旨在利用STAAD Pro V8i软件对不同地震带和土壤类型下的规则和不规则RC结构进行比较,并与IS规范1893(part1):2016和IS 875(part3):2015的规定进行比较。研究工作计算了经过50米/秒基本风速和地震带(II, III, IV, V)的多层建筑的临界设计荷载。使用印度标准规范is 1893(第1部分):2016和印度标准规范is 875(第3部分):2015检查了G+20层RC框架建筑对地震荷载的响应。