Comparison of wind flow effect for varying cross – sectional height of tall building using ANSYS

Ark Rukhaiyar, Bhagya Jayant, Kunal Dahiya, R. Raj
{"title":"Comparison of wind flow effect for varying cross – sectional height of tall building using ANSYS","authors":"Ark Rukhaiyar, Bhagya Jayant, Kunal Dahiya, R. Raj","doi":"10.55953/jera.2022.1102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study of wind is empirical for the designing of tall structures because it considers the instability due to slender behavior of these structures. In this study, three models namely A, B, and C are analyzed on ANSYS using Computational fluid dynamics approach. These three models have a total height of 192 m built of two types of cross – sections as plus and square (below plus). These models differ by the heights of the cross sections only. Plus and square cross – section heights for Model A are 96 m each, for Model B are 48 m and 144 m respectively and for Model C are 144 m and 48 m respectively. CFD simulations are performed for wind of magnitude 10 m/s when incident on these three modes at wind incidence angle 0° and the results are interpreted in terms of pressure contours and streamlines. It is observed that designing for critical faces is a must. Also from streamlines it may be observed that as the cross – sectional height of irregular shape increase, more stability is noticed. It is also observed that the wind velocity increases at the top most points of the models.","PeriodicalId":345208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research and Application","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research and Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55953/jera.2022.1102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study of wind is empirical for the designing of tall structures because it considers the instability due to slender behavior of these structures. In this study, three models namely A, B, and C are analyzed on ANSYS using Computational fluid dynamics approach. These three models have a total height of 192 m built of two types of cross – sections as plus and square (below plus). These models differ by the heights of the cross sections only. Plus and square cross – section heights for Model A are 96 m each, for Model B are 48 m and 144 m respectively and for Model C are 144 m and 48 m respectively. CFD simulations are performed for wind of magnitude 10 m/s when incident on these three modes at wind incidence angle 0° and the results are interpreted in terms of pressure contours and streamlines. It is observed that designing for critical faces is a must. Also from streamlines it may be observed that as the cross – sectional height of irregular shape increase, more stability is noticed. It is also observed that the wind velocity increases at the top most points of the models.
基于ANSYS的高层建筑不同截面高度的风流效应比较
风的研究对高层结构的设计具有经验意义,因为它考虑了高层结构细长特性所引起的失稳。本研究采用计算流体力学方法在ANSYS上对A、B、C三种模型进行分析。这三个模型的总高度为192米,由两种类型的横截面构成:正方体和方形(正方体下面)。这些模型的不同之处在于横截面的高度。模型A的正截面高度和方截面高度分别为96 m,模型B的正截面高度和方截面高度分别为48 m和144 m,模型C的正截面高度和方截面高度分别为144 m和48 m。计算流体力学(CFD)模拟了10 m/s量级的风在风入射角为0°时对这三种模式的影响,并对结果进行了压力等值线和流线的解释。可以看出,对关键面进行设计是必须的。此外,从流线可以看出,随着不规则形状截面高度的增加,稳定性也会增加。还观察到,风速在模式顶部的大多数点上都有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信