Challenges and Barriers of Blended Learning Among Asian Health Sciences Students: A Pilot Study

Huda Saber, Rosliza Abdul Manaf, Anna Tasnim Basman, S. Sanip, P. Lee, Rosemaliza Kamalludeen, Rosni Ibrahim, Syafinaz Amin-Nordin
{"title":"Challenges and Barriers of Blended Learning Among Asian Health Sciences Students: A Pilot Study","authors":"Huda Saber, Rosliza Abdul Manaf, Anna Tasnim Basman, S. Sanip, P. Lee, Rosemaliza Kamalludeen, Rosni Ibrahim, Syafinaz Amin-Nordin","doi":"10.21315/eimj2022.14.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored the perception, engagement, learning experiences, as well as challenges and barriers in blended learning (BL) or the combination of multiple delivery methods designed to complement educators and learners, of students in the health sciences courses in Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). A qualitative approach was performed using focus group discussions (FGDs). Eight medical, eight nursing and seven biomedical students were selected according to a set of criteria. Three FGDs were conducted using a semi-structured topic guide. Data were collected through audiorecordings and transcriptions. Data coding and analysis were performed using inductive content approach. Three topic highlights were developed from the analysis. Students referred to BL as an online learning platform which does not involve lectures nor lecturers. They agreed that BL allows self-directed and collaborative learning, besides it fits their learning styles. Some of them highlighted some limitations of BL when it comes to slow-learners, student-lecturer engagement and the existing infrastructure. The students also shared their good and bad experiences regarding BL, as well as feedbacks to help improve its implementation. There are a mix of positive and negative perceptions and experiences highlighted in this study. The integration of BL to the existing traditional learning style is challenging. Therefore, by examining the strengths and weaknesses of BL that have been identified in this study, it is hoped that the students’ learning experiences could be made better. Future studies could investigate more on BL implementation in larger student population to ensure its beneficial aspects towards enhancing students’ learning progress.","PeriodicalId":130340,"journal":{"name":"Education in Medicine Journal","volume":"1216 26","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2022.14.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study explored the perception, engagement, learning experiences, as well as challenges and barriers in blended learning (BL) or the combination of multiple delivery methods designed to complement educators and learners, of students in the health sciences courses in Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). A qualitative approach was performed using focus group discussions (FGDs). Eight medical, eight nursing and seven biomedical students were selected according to a set of criteria. Three FGDs were conducted using a semi-structured topic guide. Data were collected through audiorecordings and transcriptions. Data coding and analysis were performed using inductive content approach. Three topic highlights were developed from the analysis. Students referred to BL as an online learning platform which does not involve lectures nor lecturers. They agreed that BL allows self-directed and collaborative learning, besides it fits their learning styles. Some of them highlighted some limitations of BL when it comes to slow-learners, student-lecturer engagement and the existing infrastructure. The students also shared their good and bad experiences regarding BL, as well as feedbacks to help improve its implementation. There are a mix of positive and negative perceptions and experiences highlighted in this study. The integration of BL to the existing traditional learning style is challenging. Therefore, by examining the strengths and weaknesses of BL that have been identified in this study, it is hoped that the students’ learning experiences could be made better. Future studies could investigate more on BL implementation in larger student population to ensure its beneficial aspects towards enhancing students’ learning progress.
亚洲健康科学学生混合式学习的挑战和障碍:一项试点研究
本研究探讨了马来西亚博特拉大学(UPM)健康科学课程的学生在混合学习(BL)或多种教学方法的组合中的感知、参与、学习经验以及挑战和障碍,这些方法旨在补充教育者和学习者。采用焦点小组讨论(fgd)进行定性研究。根据一套标准选出八名医科学生、八名护理学生和七名生物医学学生。使用半结构化主题指南进行了三个fgd。通过录音和转录收集数据。采用归纳内容法对数据进行编码和分析。从分析中得出了三个主题亮点。学生们将BL称为一个不涉及讲座和讲师的在线学习平台。他们一致认为,BL不仅适合他们的学习方式,而且可以实现自主学习和协作学习。他们中的一些人强调了BL在慢学习者、学生与讲师的互动以及现有基础设施方面的一些局限性。同学们也分享了他们的好与坏的经验,以及反馈意见,以帮助更好地实施。这项研究强调了积极和消极的看法和经验。将BL与现有的传统学习方式相结合是具有挑战性的。因此,通过考察本研究中所发现的BL的优势和劣势,希望能够改善学生的学习体验。未来的研究可以在更大的学生群体中进行更多的调查,以确保其对促进学生学习进步的有益方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信