Caminhos, encruzilhadas, porteiras e feitiços para uma filosofia popular brasileira

Rafael Haddock-Lobo
{"title":"Caminhos, encruzilhadas, porteiras e feitiços para uma filosofia popular brasileira","authors":"Rafael Haddock-Lobo","doi":"10.36253/ccselap-13462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to present some reflections on certain aspects presents in the relationship between Brazilian popular philosophy and the macumbas (a set of religious activities that arise from the cross between the cultures of the African diaspora, the knowledge of the original peoples, and the popular Portuguese Catholicism). In this sense, at first, we will start from the notion of experience, which needs to be revisited in the light of popular knowledges in order to rethink the very notion of method. Method, then, no longer thought only as the opening of the path (as Descartes), in which the philosopher shows that there is only one to be followed, but thought from the wisdom of the forests, where the footsteps of the caboclos show us that every path is made for walking. Thus, more than a method, it seems that the question makes us rethink whether it is not “style” that we are dealing with or what we should need to deal with: the way we enchant and chant our spells so that philosophy no longer arrives loaded with the weight of a coloniality that only seems to paralyze us, like prey in front of the predator’s seductive gaze.","PeriodicalId":273297,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Cultural Studies - European and Latin American Perspectives","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Cultural Studies - European and Latin American Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/ccselap-13462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to present some reflections on certain aspects presents in the relationship between Brazilian popular philosophy and the macumbas (a set of religious activities that arise from the cross between the cultures of the African diaspora, the knowledge of the original peoples, and the popular Portuguese Catholicism). In this sense, at first, we will start from the notion of experience, which needs to be revisited in the light of popular knowledges in order to rethink the very notion of method. Method, then, no longer thought only as the opening of the path (as Descartes), in which the philosopher shows that there is only one to be followed, but thought from the wisdom of the forests, where the footsteps of the caboclos show us that every path is made for walking. Thus, more than a method, it seems that the question makes us rethink whether it is not “style” that we are dealing with or what we should need to deal with: the way we enchant and chant our spells so that philosophy no longer arrives loaded with the weight of a coloniality that only seems to paralyze us, like prey in front of the predator’s seductive gaze.
巴西流行哲学的路径、十字路口、门卫和咒语
本文旨在对巴西大众哲学与macumbas(一套宗教活动,源于非洲侨民的文化、原始民族的知识和流行的葡萄牙天主教)之间关系的某些方面提出一些反思。在这个意义上,首先,我们将从经验的概念开始,为了重新思考方法的概念,需要根据大众知识重新审视经验的概念。因此,方法不再仅仅被认为是道路的开口(像笛卡尔那样),哲学家在其中指出只有一条路可走,而是从森林的智慧中思考,在那里,卡波克洛的脚步声告诉我们,每条路都是用来行走的。因此,不仅仅是一种方法,这个问题似乎让我们重新思考,我们正在处理的不是“风格”,还是我们应该处理的:我们着迷和吟唱咒语的方式,以便哲学不再背负着殖民主义的重量,这种殖民主义似乎只会麻痹我们,就像在捕食者诱惑的目光面前的猎物一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信