Subaedah, Abdul Wahab, Muh Azhar, Muh Aidil Sudarmono, Abdul Qahar Zainal
{"title":"Constructive Learning Models on Students' Understanding and Application of Learning Concepts","authors":"Subaedah, Abdul Wahab, Muh Azhar, Muh Aidil Sudarmono, Abdul Qahar Zainal","doi":"10.31538/tijie.v4i2.524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the differences between the constructivist learning model and the conventional learning model for 1) the ability to understand and apply science concepts; 2) interest in learning science; and 3) scientific performance in the field of science. Using a quasi-experimental research learning model with independent variables constructivist learning models and conventional learning models, and the dependent variable includes the ability to understand and apply science concepts, interest in learning science, and scientific performance in science. The population in this study were students of SMP Negeri 34 Makassar, as a sample of students in class VII2 and class VII5 who were randomly selected. The results of the descriptive analysis showed that there was a significant difference in scientific performance between the class with the constructivist learning model and the control class with the conventional learning model. The experimental class obtained a mean = 85.94, the control class obtained a mean = 66.09. The results of the data analysis concluded that there were significant differences in the ability to understand and apply science concepts, interest in learning science, and scientific performance in science between students who were given a constructivist learning model and students who were given a conventional learning model.","PeriodicalId":406806,"journal":{"name":"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v4i2.524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to determine the differences between the constructivist learning model and the conventional learning model for 1) the ability to understand and apply science concepts; 2) interest in learning science; and 3) scientific performance in the field of science. Using a quasi-experimental research learning model with independent variables constructivist learning models and conventional learning models, and the dependent variable includes the ability to understand and apply science concepts, interest in learning science, and scientific performance in science. The population in this study were students of SMP Negeri 34 Makassar, as a sample of students in class VII2 and class VII5 who were randomly selected. The results of the descriptive analysis showed that there was a significant difference in scientific performance between the class with the constructivist learning model and the control class with the conventional learning model. The experimental class obtained a mean = 85.94, the control class obtained a mean = 66.09. The results of the data analysis concluded that there were significant differences in the ability to understand and apply science concepts, interest in learning science, and scientific performance in science between students who were given a constructivist learning model and students who were given a conventional learning model.
本研究旨在确定建构主义学习模式与传统学习模式在以下方面的差异:1)理解和应用科学概念的能力;2)学习科学的兴趣;3)科学领域的科学表现。采用具有自变量的准实验研究性学习模型:建构主义学习模型和传统学习模型,因变量包括理解和应用科学概念的能力、学习科学的兴趣和科学表现。本研究的人群为SMP Negeri 34 Makassar的学生,作为随机抽取的VII2和VII5班的学生样本。描述性分析结果显示,采用建构主义学习模式的班级与采用传统学习模式的控制班级在科学成绩上存在显著差异。实验组的平均值为85.94,对照组的平均值为66.09。数据分析的结果表明,建构主义学习模式与传统学习模式的学生在理解和应用科学概念的能力、学习科学的兴趣和科学表现方面存在显著差异。