The Efficacy of Video Cameras to Account for Northern Bobwhites Flushed, but Undetected During Aerial Surveys

Andrea Montalvo, L. Brennan, Michael L. Morrison, Eric D. Grahmann, Andrew N. Tri
{"title":"The Efficacy of Video Cameras to Account for Northern Bobwhites Flushed, but Undetected During Aerial Surveys","authors":"Andrea Montalvo, L. Brennan, Michael L. Morrison, Eric D. Grahmann, Andrew N. Tri","doi":"10.7290/nqsp09ylse","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past 20 years, conventional distance sampling from a helicopter platform has been used to estimate northern bobwhite ( Colinus virginianus ; hereafter, bobwhite) density over large areas of rangeland vegetation. However, it has been speculated that aerial surveys can complicate the ability to meet the distance sampling assumption of detecting 100% of the target objects on the transect line due to the restricted observer view from the helicopter. We attempted to use video cameras to determine whether missed detections occurred and whether digital methods could improve the precision of bobwhite density estimates. Our objectives were to 1) determine whether video cameras are a viable option to detect if coveys are flushing behind the helicopter and missed by observers, 2) determine whether coveys are flushing underneath the helicopter and missed by observers, and 3) explore the use of video cameras in a mark-recapture distance sampling (MRDS) framework. We recorded video while traversing line-transects with a helicopter during 4 distance-sampling surveys across 2 ranches in South Texas, USA. For objective 1, we reviewed footage from cameras with a backward-facing view and detected only 1 pair of bobwhites (0.001% of 889 coveys detected) that flushed on video footage recorded during the surveys but were unnoticed by observers. These results indicated that when coveys flushed, they rarely flushed behind the helicopter, and the helicopter flew at what seemed to be the proper speed and altitude to detect late flushes. For objective 2, we reviewed footage from a helicopter-mounted camera that was recorded within a swath underneath the helicopter’s center. We recorded 22 flushes within the swath, none of which was missed by the observers in the helicopter; as a result, we could not complete an MRDS analysis in Program Distance. This study improved confidence in fulfilling the assumptions of distance sampling and resulting density estimates but was limited to flushing birds only.","PeriodicalId":205881,"journal":{"name":"National Quail Symposium Proceedings","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Quail Symposium Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7290/nqsp09ylse","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, conventional distance sampling from a helicopter platform has been used to estimate northern bobwhite ( Colinus virginianus ; hereafter, bobwhite) density over large areas of rangeland vegetation. However, it has been speculated that aerial surveys can complicate the ability to meet the distance sampling assumption of detecting 100% of the target objects on the transect line due to the restricted observer view from the helicopter. We attempted to use video cameras to determine whether missed detections occurred and whether digital methods could improve the precision of bobwhite density estimates. Our objectives were to 1) determine whether video cameras are a viable option to detect if coveys are flushing behind the helicopter and missed by observers, 2) determine whether coveys are flushing underneath the helicopter and missed by observers, and 3) explore the use of video cameras in a mark-recapture distance sampling (MRDS) framework. We recorded video while traversing line-transects with a helicopter during 4 distance-sampling surveys across 2 ranches in South Texas, USA. For objective 1, we reviewed footage from cameras with a backward-facing view and detected only 1 pair of bobwhites (0.001% of 889 coveys detected) that flushed on video footage recorded during the surveys but were unnoticed by observers. These results indicated that when coveys flushed, they rarely flushed behind the helicopter, and the helicopter flew at what seemed to be the proper speed and altitude to detect late flushes. For objective 2, we reviewed footage from a helicopter-mounted camera that was recorded within a swath underneath the helicopter’s center. We recorded 22 flushes within the swath, none of which was missed by the observers in the helicopter; as a result, we could not complete an MRDS analysis in Program Distance. This study improved confidence in fulfilling the assumptions of distance sampling and resulting density estimates but was limited to flushing birds only.
在空中调查中,摄像机对北方山齿鹑被冲红但未被发现的影响
在过去的20年里,直升机平台上的常规距离采样被用来估计北山齿鹑(Colinus virginianus;(以下简称山齿鹑)在大面积牧场植被上的密度。然而,据推测,由于直升机上的观察者视野受限,航空测量可以使满足在横断面上检测100%目标物体的距离采样假设的能力复杂化。我们尝试使用摄像机来确定是否发生漏检,以及数字方法是否可以提高山齿鹑密度估计的精度。我们的目标是:1)确定摄像机是否是一种可行的选择,以检测在直升机后面冲刷的鸟是否被观察者遗漏;2)确定在直升机下面冲刷的鸟是否被观察者遗漏;3)探索摄像机在标记-重新捕获距离采样(MRDS)框架中的使用。在美国德克萨斯州南部的2个牧场进行的4次距离采样调查中,我们在用直升机穿越线样线时记录了视频。对于目标1,我们回顾了从背向视角的摄像机拍摄的镜头,并在调查期间记录的视频片段中仅检测到一对山齿鹑(检测到的889只山齿鹑中的0.001%),但未被观察者注意到。这些结果表明,当渡鸦脸红时,它们很少在直升机后面脸红,而直升机的飞行速度和高度似乎是检测晚脸红的适当速度和高度。对于目标2,我们回顾了从直升机上安装的摄像机拍摄的镜头,该摄像机记录在直升机中心下方的一条带状区域内。我们在这条带状区域内记录了22次冲水,直升机上的观察员没有错过一次;因此,我们无法在Program Distance中完成MRDS分析。这项研究提高了对实现距离采样假设和由此产生的密度估计的信心,但仅限于冲洗鸟类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信