{"title":"Comparison between 3 and 8 Leg 6-DOF shake table","authors":"N. Gupta, M. Ganesh, A. Dash","doi":"10.1109/RACE.2015.7097233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The earthquakes are a constant risk on human lives and costly structures. To reduce loss, structures are tested for their resistance to earthquake. However, a 6-DOF seismic simulator (UPS-leg) having the existing design of eight actuators (four vertical actuators, two actuators each along X and Y axes) is very costly to afford. In this paper, an alternate design of shake table (3-legged RPRS 6-DOF, by 6 active actuators) is proposed for investigation having better motion capability, higher payload carrying capacity, ease in control, redundant, decoupled motion and at lower cost. To make a meaningful comparison between the two manipulators we choose stiffness parameters.","PeriodicalId":161131,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Robotics, Automation, Control and Embedded Systems (RACE)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Robotics, Automation, Control and Embedded Systems (RACE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RACE.2015.7097233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The earthquakes are a constant risk on human lives and costly structures. To reduce loss, structures are tested for their resistance to earthquake. However, a 6-DOF seismic simulator (UPS-leg) having the existing design of eight actuators (four vertical actuators, two actuators each along X and Y axes) is very costly to afford. In this paper, an alternate design of shake table (3-legged RPRS 6-DOF, by 6 active actuators) is proposed for investigation having better motion capability, higher payload carrying capacity, ease in control, redundant, decoupled motion and at lower cost. To make a meaningful comparison between the two manipulators we choose stiffness parameters.