Is Aberrometric Analysis Based on Zernike Modes That May Not be Correct?

Mehrdad Sadeghi, J. Omidian
{"title":"Is Aberrometric Analysis Based on Zernike Modes That May Not be Correct?","authors":"Mehrdad Sadeghi, J. Omidian","doi":"10.5812/jcrps.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Aberrometric analysis of the wavefront in patients with refractive disorders is performed using the Zernike pyramid mode and based on that, a treatment plan is determined however, it is not clear what Zernike modes are derived from mathematical analysis, exactly how much they correspond to the clinical facts this article discusses ways to study this issue. Evidence Acquisition: One of the methods for studying optical systems is the aberrometry of wavefront. the wavefront is a two-dimensional surface perpendicular to a bunch of parallel light rays, that all these rays have the same phase on this surface (because light emits sinusoidally and therefore has multiple identical phases) whenever these rays pass through a refractive surface, it is also called the reference level this refractive index will be ideal if the homogeneity of these rays is maintained and the rays of this bunch of light will be able to focus at one point, but if the by passing light through the refractive surface the wavefront will be disturbed and the lights on this surface have different phases than the reference surface then it is said there is a discrepancy or deviation between the reference surface and the wavefront. Therefore, aberration is the creation of the distance of the wavefront in a certain phase from the refractive surface or reference surface. When we say refractive surface, we do not mean a specific place like the cornea because other than the cornea other factors such as crystalline lens, vitreous, retin even tear layer they are involved in creating aberrations, but usually the pupil range is considered as the reference surface. Results: Modes z-13 and z13 of the fourth order and modes z04 and z-24, z24 from the fifth order and modes z-15, z15 of six order and modes z06, z-26, z26 of seventh order they are not pure and mathematically they have some lower order which may cause in analysis aberrometry disruption as a result, the relevant orders have a little more or less value. Conclusions: There are no strong clinical reasons for Zernike modes to be a fully accurate description of aberromerty, so clinicians should consider other clinical data and findings in their interpretation. Some modes of high-order Zernike have sentences of low-order This can cause abnormal analysis.","PeriodicalId":254271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jcrps.100112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Aberrometric analysis of the wavefront in patients with refractive disorders is performed using the Zernike pyramid mode and based on that, a treatment plan is determined however, it is not clear what Zernike modes are derived from mathematical analysis, exactly how much they correspond to the clinical facts this article discusses ways to study this issue. Evidence Acquisition: One of the methods for studying optical systems is the aberrometry of wavefront. the wavefront is a two-dimensional surface perpendicular to a bunch of parallel light rays, that all these rays have the same phase on this surface (because light emits sinusoidally and therefore has multiple identical phases) whenever these rays pass through a refractive surface, it is also called the reference level this refractive index will be ideal if the homogeneity of these rays is maintained and the rays of this bunch of light will be able to focus at one point, but if the by passing light through the refractive surface the wavefront will be disturbed and the lights on this surface have different phases than the reference surface then it is said there is a discrepancy or deviation between the reference surface and the wavefront. Therefore, aberration is the creation of the distance of the wavefront in a certain phase from the refractive surface or reference surface. When we say refractive surface, we do not mean a specific place like the cornea because other than the cornea other factors such as crystalline lens, vitreous, retin even tear layer they are involved in creating aberrations, but usually the pupil range is considered as the reference surface. Results: Modes z-13 and z13 of the fourth order and modes z04 and z-24, z24 from the fifth order and modes z-15, z15 of six order and modes z06, z-26, z26 of seventh order they are not pure and mathematically they have some lower order which may cause in analysis aberrometry disruption as a result, the relevant orders have a little more or less value. Conclusions: There are no strong clinical reasons for Zernike modes to be a fully accurate description of aberromerty, so clinicians should consider other clinical data and findings in their interpretation. Some modes of high-order Zernike have sentences of low-order This can cause abnormal analysis.
基于泽尼克模式的像差分析可能不正确吗?
背景:使用Zernike金字塔模型对屈光性疾病患者的波前进行像差分析,并在此基础上确定治疗方案。然而,目前尚不清楚从数学分析中得出的Zernike模式,以及它们与临床事实的对应程度。本文讨论了研究该问题的方法。证据获取:波前像差法是研究光学系统的方法之一。波前是一个二维表面垂直于一束平行光线,这些光线具有相同的阶段在这个表面(因为光发出,因此呈现正弦有多个相同的阶段)每当这些射线通过折射表面,这也被称为参考电平折射率将理想如果这些射线的同质性维护和这群光的射线能够集中在一个点,但是,如果光通过折射率表面,波前将受到干扰,并且该表面上的光与参考表面具有不同的相位,那么就说参考表面和波前之间存在差异或偏差。因此,像差是某一相位的波前与折光面或参考面之间距离的产生。当我们说屈光面时,我们并不是指像角膜这样的一个特定的地方,因为除了角膜之外,还有其他因素,如晶状体、玻璃体、视网膜甚至泪液层,它们都涉及到产生像差,但通常瞳孔范围被认为是参考面。结果:四阶的z-13、z13模态和五阶的z04、z-24、z24模态以及六阶的z-15、z15模态和七阶的z06、z-26、z26模态都不是纯的,在数学上它们有一定的低阶,在分析像差测量时可能会造成干扰,因此相关的阶数或多或少具有一定的价值。结论:没有强有力的临床理由证明泽尼克模式是对像差的完全准确描述,因此临床医生在解释时应考虑其他临床数据和发现。一些高阶Zernike模式有低阶句子,这可能导致分析异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信